Latin America and Caribbean · SLV

El Salvador

Baseline index 5.68Rank 107 of 197NascentLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Stretched developers. Exposed to food and funding shocks; debt relief and better yields are their upside. One of 27 nations with a similar pattern of results.

High stakes over 10 years: higher vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
24.9
rank 87 of 197 · 3 years: 24.7
Worst case
−15.3%
Regional war spillover · tail −14.9%
Opportunity · 10 years
−5.7
rank 95 of 197 · 3 years: −5.4
Best case
+12
Clean power threshold · gainer in 1 of 10
Shock absorbed
24%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.27
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Monetary & Currency Capability
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, Global funding seizure, AI labour shock. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; remittances relative to gdp; public debt relative to gdp; earthquake, storm, flood, drought and volcanic hazards named for the nation; few months of imports covered by reserves; urban share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in El Salvador’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.77−0.87−1.10−0.49▼ 425Strategic Strike & Missile Defence 0 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.74−0.85−1.12−0.50▼ 322Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.3 · Inception
Core disaster S07High 0.85−0.82−1.19−0.52▼ 428Energy Infrastructure 5.1 · Nascent
Global funding seizure S02High 0.83−0.78−1.03−0.45▼ 420Monetary & Currency Capability 3.4 · Nascent
AI labour shock S08High 0.63−0.70−0.92−0.41021Artificial Intelligence 1.2 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.63−0.66−0.78−0.35014Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.55−0.62−0.79−0.35▼ 320Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.63−0.61−0.80−0.35020Information Environment & Strategic Communication 3.2 · Nascent
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.39−0.45−0.61−0.27▲ 217Monetary & Currency Capability 4.5 · Nascent
Hybrid coercion S04Medium 0.38−0.34−0.43−0.19▲ 114Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.5 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.46−1.17−1.07−0.45−0.45−1.12−1.05−0.90−1.16
Severe pandemic−0.79−0.46−0.38−1.11−0.97−1.04−0.97−0.95−0.95
Core disaster−0.04−1.24−0.40−0.98−0.44−1.10−1.18−1.01−1.01
Global funding seizure−0.44−0.52·−0.53−0.47−1.06−1.73−1.22−1.08
AI labour shock−0.70−0.36·−0.95−0.83−0.98−0.83−0.82−0.82
Cryptographic trust break−0.76−0.48−0.87·−1.06−0.99−0.93−0.40−0.45
Trade bloc rupture−0.69−0.32−0.29−0.32−0.74−0.72−0.74−0.73−1.00
Legitimacy rupture−0.34−0.39−0.71−0.36−0.83−1.15−0.95−0.36−0.41
Breadbasket failure−0.24−0.56−0.19−0.53−0.50−0.54−0.58−0.43−0.49
Hybrid coercion−0.25−0.55−0.55·−0.61−0.63·−0.23−0.23
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what El Salvador is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Gainer+11.813.92.11876Energy Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed+9.015.06.02296Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed+8.815.76.93320Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 5.5 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed+1.68.56.930109Intelligence & Assessment 4.8 · Nascent
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed−3.619.523.13284Investment Attraction & Projection 5.7 · Nascent
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed−5.214.219.421101Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Loser−10.28.919.022148Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−10.817.328.123131Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−14.88.022.816130Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.3 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−21.04.625.610101Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.3 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for El Salvador, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Loss of financial stability6.6 Foundational → Nascent4.2% Possible · rank 16Global funding seizure Extreme×1.6Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4
Broad fall in financial strength6.3 Foundational → Nascent3.0% Possible · rank 7Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Majorplans fail×1.7Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4
Breakdown of state function8.6 Foundational → Nascent2.5% Possible · rank 97Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.2Maritime Power 2.8
Rupture in trade and supply7.1 Foundational → Nascent1.7% Possible · rank 29Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×1.9Maritime Power 2.8
Broad fall in governance and integrity7.4 Foundational → Nascent1.7% Possible · rank 74Global funding seizure Severe + Core disaster Severeplans fail×2.6Financial System Depth & Access 7.2
Health system failure8.7 Foundational → Nascent1.0% Possible · rank 39Global funding seizure Major + Severe pandemic Extreme×1.8Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2
Broad fall in trade and investment6.9 Foundational → Nascent1.0% Unlikely · rank 33Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.6Maritime Power 2.8
Loss of industrial capacity6.5 Foundational → Nascent0.7% Unlikely · rank 22Global funding seizure Severe + Core disaster Severeplans fail×2.3Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4
Rule of law failure6.3 Foundational → Nascent0.7% Unlikely · rank 99Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×2.5Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4.7
Broad fall in production and innovation6.2 Foundational → Nascent0.6% Unlikely · rank 20Global funding seizure Severe + Core disaster Severeplans fail×2.5Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4
Food and water failure7.5 Foundational → Nascent0.6% Unlikely · rank 60Breadbasket failure Severe + Core disaster Severeplans fail×2.3Financial System Depth & Access 7.2
Breakdown of information trust5.4 Nascent → Inception0.4% Unlikely · rank 123Legitimacy rupture Extreme + AI labour shock Majorplans fail×2.5Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4.7
Collapse in energy security3.9 Nascent → Inception0.4% Unlikely · rank 75Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail×2.0Maritime Power 2.8
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure6.5 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 69Global funding seizure Major + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.4Financial System Depth & Access 7.2
Diplomatic isolation5.0 Nascent → Inception0.2% Remote · rank 109Trade bloc rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.8Quantum Technologies 0.3
Broad fall in human capital7.6 Foundational → Nascent0.1% Remote · rank 73Global funding seizure Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2
Broad fall in information and influence5.5 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 114Trade bloc rupture Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.8Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2
Defence readiness failure4.6 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 70Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×2.7Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4.7
Education pipeline failure8.4 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 115Regional war spillover Extreme + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.9Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2
Broad fall in critical technology1.3 Inception— No route · rank 108Already at the foot of the scale×3.8—
Broad fall in national security3.3 Nascent— No route · rank 114No route found · closest 2.8 of 3×2.8—
Loss of advanced technology base0.7 Inception— No route · rank 108Already at the foot of the scale×4.8—
Failure of digital lifelines6.1 Foundational → Nascent— Remote · rank 126Core disaster Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.8Quantum Technologies 0.3
Loss of strategic deterrence1.0 Inception— No route · rank 108Already at the foot of the scale×3.5—
Strategic awareness failure2.9 Inception— No route · rank 113Already at the foot of the scale×2.3—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology1.3 Inception— No route · rank 107No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.3—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure6.5 Foundational— No route · rank 107No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.3—
Broad rise in national security3.3 Nascent— No route · rank 107No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Broad rise in human capital7.6 Foundational— No route · rank 107No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.6—
Broad rise in information and influence5.5 Nascent— No route · rank 107No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.7—
Broad rise in governance and integrity7.4 Foundational— No route · rank 107No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.1—
Broad rise in financial strength6.3 Foundational— No route · rank 107No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.8—
Broad rise in production and innovation6.2 Foundational— No route · rank 107No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.1—
Broad rise in trade and investment6.9 Foundational— No route · rank 107No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.3—
Assured space services1.3 Inception— No route · rank 107No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.6—
Frontier AI and compute1.5 Inception— No route · rank 107No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.8—
Higher-value manufacturing4.1 Nascent— No route · rank 107No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.7—
Reliable low-cost energy4.0 Nascent— No route · rank 108No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.6—
Secure food and water supply7.5 Foundational— No route · rank 107No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.1—
More deployable joint force4.3 Nascent— No route · rank 107No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Adaptable skilled workforce6.5 Foundational— No route · rank 107No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.1—
Stronger health and biotechnology6.4 Foundational— No route · rank 107No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.5—
Stronger information environment6.1 Foundational— No route · rank 107No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.0—
Wider international influence5.0 Nascent— No route · rank 107No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.7—
Capable digital government7.9 Foundational— No route · rank 109No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.5—
Trusted public institutions6.2 Foundational— No route · rank 109No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.5—
Deeper long-term finance6.7 Foundational— No route · rank 107No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.1—
Research translated into value5.1 Nascent— No route · rank 107No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.1—
Higher-value international business6.1 Foundational— No route · rank 107No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.1—
Sophisticated export strength7.8 Foundational— No route · rank 107No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×3.9—