Indo-Pacific · FJI

Fiji

Baseline index 5.16Rank 115 of 197NascentIndo-PacificAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on vulnerability; the upside mostly passes them by. One of 40 nations with a similar pattern of results.

High stakes over 10 years: higher vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
29.6
rank 74 of 197 · 3 years: 29.3
Worst case
−19.9%
Regional war spillover · tail −17.3%
Opportunity · 10 years
−6.5
rank 99 of 197 · 3 years: −6.0
Best case
+10
Outbreak defence succeeds · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
21%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.30
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
8of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Hybrid coercion. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; adult obesity rate; remittances relative to gdp; internet users as a share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Fiji’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.94−1.03−1.29−0.58▼ 628Strategic Strike & Missile Defence 0 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.76−0.84−1.05−0.48▼ 319Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.72−0.82−1.04−0.47▼ 121Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.82−0.81−0.93−0.43▼ 519Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01High 0.66−0.71−0.89−0.41▼ 317Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.70−0.61−0.74−0.33▼ 518Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05Medium 0.59−0.53−0.74−0.33▼ 112Information Environment & Strategic Communication 3.1 · Nascent
Global funding seizure S02Medium 0.54−0.49−0.65−0.29▲ 211Economic Output & Productivity 2.8 · Inception
Core disaster S07Medium 0.42−0.41−0.58−0.26▲ 110Energy Infrastructure 4 · Nascent
Breadbasket failure S06Low 0.27−0.32−0.42−0.18▲ 59Energy Infrastructure 4.3 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.34−1.45−1.12−0.56−0.56−1.39−1.30−1.11−1.43
AI labour shock−0.46−0.45·−1.21−1.06−1.24−1.06−1.03−1.03
Severe pandemic−0.44−0.46−0.37−1.12−0.98−1.05−0.98−0.96−0.96
Cryptographic trust break−0.50−0.63−1.07·−1.40−1.31−1.22−0.52−0.60
Trade bloc rupture−0.43−0.39−0.35−0.39−0.91−0.88−0.91−0.89−1.23
Hybrid coercion−0.33−1.02−0.97·−1.13−1.17·−0.42−0.42
Legitimacy rupture−0.22−0.35−0.60−0.32−0.74−1.03−0.84−0.32−0.36
Global funding seizure−0.21−0.33·−0.33−0.30−0.68−1.10−0.77−0.69
Core disaster−0.02−0.62−0.20−0.49−0.22−0.55−0.59−0.51−0.51
Breadbasket failure−0.12−0.40−0.14−0.37−0.36−0.38−0.41−0.31−0.35
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Fiji is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed+9.612.63.01893Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed+5.811.65.92590Intelligence & Assessment 3.3 · Nascent
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Mixed+3.512.08.515114Energy Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed+2.519.416.92859Energy Infrastructure 4.9 · Nascent
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed+0.57.36.83291Energy Infrastructure 4.9 · Nascent
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed−3.111.915.02090Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed−7.76.213.918134Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−17.14.721.8784Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−18.014.732.719167Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−23.98.932.814170Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Fiji, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function8.6 Foundational → Nascent4.3% Possible · rank 29Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severe×1.8Resource Infrastructure 3
Rupture in trade and supply5.9 Nascent → Inception3.1% Possible · rank 13Regional war spillover Extreme×1.5Resource Infrastructure 3
Loss of financial stability6.8 Foundational → Nascent2.3% Possible · rank 68Regional war spillover Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Major×2.2Resource Infrastructure 3
Broad fall in governance and integrity8.1 Foundational → Nascent2.3% Possible · rank 28Regional war spillover Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Major×2.2Resource Infrastructure 3
Breakdown of information trust5.9 Nascent → Inception1.5% Possible · rank 16Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×2.1Artificial Intelligence 1
Broad fall in financial strength6.6 Foundational → Nascent1.5% Possible · rank 63Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Resource Infrastructure 3
Diplomatic isolation6.0 Foundational → Inception1.3% Possible · rank 6Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.1Quantum Technologies 0
Rule of law failure8.1 Foundational → Nascent1.2% Possible · rank 31Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.1Quantum Technologies 0
Broad fall in trade and investment5.8 Nascent → Inception1.1% Possible · rank 22Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Extreme×2.1Resource Infrastructure 3
Health system failure7.7 Foundational → Nascent0.8% Unlikely · rank 81Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extreme×1.8Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1
Broad fall in information and influence5.6 Nascent → Inception0.7% Unlikely · rank 54Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×2.1Quantum Technologies 0
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure5.4 Nascent → Inception0.4% Unlikely · rank 53Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Severe×2.1Resource Infrastructure 3
Loss of industrial capacity5.0 Nascent → Inception0.4% Unlikely · rank 68Regional war spillover Extreme + AI labour shock Majorplans fail×2.7Resource Infrastructure 3
Broad fall in production and innovation5.1 Nascent → Inception0.4% Unlikely · rank 62Regional war spillover Extreme + AI labour shock Majorplans fail×2.7Resource Infrastructure 3
Food and water failure6.7 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 115Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×2.7Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 2.3
Failure of digital lifelines5.1 Nascent → Inception0.2% Remote · rank 69Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×2.6Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 2.3
Broad fall in human capital7.1 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Remote · rank 65Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1
Education pipeline failure8.2 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 143AI labour shock Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1
Broad fall in critical technology0.5 Inception— No route · rank 116Already at the foot of the scale×6.0—
Broad fall in national security2.3 Inception— No route · rank 122Already at the foot of the scale×2.7—
Loss of advanced technology base0.2 Inception— No route · rank 116Already at the foot of the scale×16—
Collapse in energy security2.8 Inception— No route · rank 134Already at the foot of the scale×1.8—
Defence readiness failure2.9 Inception— No route · rank 136Already at the foot of the scale×2.2—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.4 Inception— No route · rank 116Already at the foot of the scale×6.8—
Strategic awareness failure2.0 Inception— No route · rank 121Already at the foot of the scale×2.0—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology0.5 Inception— No route · rank 115No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.2—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure5.4 Nascent— No route · rank 115No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.3—
Broad rise in national security2.3 Inception— No route · rank 115No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×7.8—
Broad rise in human capital7.1 Foundational— No route · rank 115No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.6—
Broad rise in information and influence5.6 Nascent— No route · rank 115No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.5—
Broad rise in governance and integrity8.1 Foundational— No route · rank 115No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.1—
Broad rise in financial strength6.6 Foundational— No route · rank 115No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.8—
Broad rise in production and innovation5.1 Nascent— No route · rank 115No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.2—
Broad rise in trade and investment5.8 Nascent— No route · rank 115No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.3—
Assured space services0.8 Inception— No route · rank 115No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.1—
Frontier AI and compute0.5 Inception— No route · rank 115No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.8—
Higher-value manufacturing2.5 Inception— No route · rank 115No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.9—
Reliable low-cost energy2.7 Inception— No route · rank 115No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×4.1—
Secure food and water supply6.7 Foundational— No route · rank 115No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.2—
More deployable joint force3.3 Nascent— No route · rank 115No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.6—
Adaptable skilled workforce6.1 Foundational— No route · rank 115No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.1—
Stronger health and biotechnology5.4 Nascent— No route · rank 115No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.1—
Stronger information environment5.2 Nascent— No route · rank 115No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.0—
Wider international influence6.0 Foundational— No route · rank 115No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.2—
Capable digital government7.3 Foundational— No route · rank 116No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.9—
Trusted public institutions7.6 Foundational— No route · rank 116No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.1—
Deeper long-term finance6.5 Foundational— No route · rank 115No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.7—
Research translated into value4.4 Nascent— No route · rank 115No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.2—
Higher-value international business5.6 Nascent— No route · rank 115No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.1—
Sophisticated export strength5.9 Nascent— No route · rank 115No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.9—