Latin America and Caribbean · HTI

Haiti

Baseline index 2.02Rank 189 of 197InceptionLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Acute fragility. Every scenario is severe; there is little capability left to lose. One of 14 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
71.7
rank 9 of 197 · 3 years: 71.6
Worst case
−55.4%
Core disaster · tail −49.1%
Opportunity · 10 years
−22.2
rank 183 of 197 · 3 years: −21.8
Best case
+3
Clean power threshold · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
7%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.34
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
0of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Advanced Materials & Manufacturing
weakest point in 1 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Breadbasket failure, Regional war spillover, Trade bloc rupture. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; share of exports going to china and the united states; earthquake, storm, flood, drought and volcanic hazards named for the nation; youth unemployment rate; remittances relative to gdp; consumer price inflation; low real gdp per head; low life expectancy at birth.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Haiti’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Core disaster S07High 0.92−1.12−1.23−0.56▼ 510National Resilience & Crisis Management 0 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.95−0.98−1.03−0.50▼ 38Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06High 0.66−0.89−0.98−0.44▼ 310Internal Security & Order 0.2 · Inception
Regional war spillover S03High 0.66−0.77−0.83−0.39▲ 27Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10Medium 0.53−0.68−0.74−0.3308Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.56−0.66−0.71−0.3207Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
AI labour shock S08Medium 0.49−0.61−0.66−0.29▲ 18Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09Medium 0.50−0.51−0.53−0.25▲ 15Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02Medium 0.43−0.47−0.52−0.23▲ 26Investment Attraction & Projection 0.5 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04Low 0.30−0.29−0.31−0.14▲ 13Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 0 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Core disaster−0.04−1.66−0.43−1.38−0.62−1.54−1.66−1.38−1.38
Legitimacy rupture−0.19−0.71−0.83−0.66−1.32−1.96−1.73−0.66−0.75
Breadbasket failure−0.16−1.12−0.33−1.09−1.04−1.12−1.19−0.89−1.02
Regional war spillover−0.16−1.09−0.58−0.46−0.46−1.15−1.07−0.92−1.06
Severe pandemic−0.19−0.40−0.28−0.97−0.85−0.91−0.85−0.83−0.83
Trade bloc rupture−0.19−0.38−0.29−0.38−0.89−0.86−0.89−0.88−1.13
AI labour shock−0.19−0.34·−0.91−0.80−0.94−0.80−0.78−0.78
Cryptographic trust break−0.19−0.43−0.55·−0.95−0.89−0.83−0.36−0.41
Global funding seizure−0.12−0.33·−0.33−0.30−0.67−1.08−0.76−0.68
Hybrid coercion−0.11−0.51−0.40·−0.56−0.58·−0.21−0.21
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Haiti is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Mixed+2.65.22.76122Energy Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−4.64.28.912159Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 2 · Inception
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed−5.23.48.67160Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed−6.02.98.910151Intelligence & Assessment 1.7 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−16.34.921.27161Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Public service leap S18 ↗Loser−20.56.026.47181Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Loser−20.95.426.37191Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−35.72.638.36193Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Loser−39.05.244.211194Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 1.7 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−45.20.946.22193Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Haiti, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Health system failure3.3 Nascent → Inception2.3% Possible · rank 3Breadbasket failure Severe + Core disaster Severe×1.6National Resilience & Crisis Management 2.4
Education pipeline failure3.1 Nascent → Inception0.2% Remote · rank 36Breadbasket failure Severe + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.4National Resilience & Crisis Management 2.4
Broad fall in critical technology0.2 Inception— No route · rank 189Already at the foot of the scale×16—
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure2.5 Inception— No route · rank 189Already at the foot of the scale×1.8—
Broad fall in national security0.9 Inception— No route · rank 189Already at the foot of the scale×3.6—
Broad fall in human capital2.8 Inception— No route · rank 190Already at the foot of the scale×2.2—
Broad fall in information and influence2.8 Inception— No route · rank 190Already at the foot of the scale×2.3—
Broad fall in governance and integrity2.3 Inception— No route · rank 191Already at the foot of the scale×1.5—
Broad fall in financial strength2.3 Inception— No route · rank 189Already at the foot of the scale×1.7—
Broad fall in production and innovation2.2 Inception— No route · rank 189Already at the foot of the scale×2.2—
Broad fall in trade and investment2.4 Inception— No route · rank 189Already at the foot of the scale×2.2—
Loss of advanced technology base0.0 Inception— No route · rank 189Already at the foot of the scale——
Collapse in energy security1.5 Inception— No route · rank 189Already at the foot of the scale×2.2—
Failure of digital lifelines2.4 Inception— No route · rank 189Already at the foot of the scale×3.6—
Food and water failure2.9 Inception— No route · rank 192Already at the foot of the scale×1.6—
Defence readiness failure1.4 Inception— No route · rank 191Already at the foot of the scale×2.3—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.2 Inception— No route · rank 189Already at the foot of the scale×13—
Strategic awareness failure0.7 Inception— No route · rank 189Already at the foot of the scale×5.1—
Breakdown of information trust2.3 Inception— No route · rank 190Already at the foot of the scale×1.6—
Diplomatic isolation2.1 Inception— No route · rank 190Already at the foot of the scale×2.5—
Breakdown of state function2.3 Inception— No route · rank 191Already at the foot of the scale×1.5—
Rule of law failure2.4 Inception— No route · rank 191Already at the foot of the scale×1.4—
Loss of financial stability2.4 Inception— No route · rank 189Already at the foot of the scale×1.6—
Loss of industrial capacity2.5 Inception— No route · rank 189Already at the foot of the scale×1.9—
Rupture in trade and supply2.7 Inception— No route · rank 189Already at the foot of the scale×1.7—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology0.2 Inception— No route · rank 189No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×15—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure2.5 Inception— No route · rank 189No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—
Broad rise in national security0.9 Inception— No route · rank 189No route found · closest 0.1 of 1.5×31—
Broad rise in human capital2.8 Inception— No route · rank 189No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×15—
Broad rise in information and influence2.8 Inception— No route · rank 189No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×17—
Broad rise in governance and integrity2.3 Inception— No route · rank 189No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×10—
Broad rise in financial strength2.3 Inception— No route · rank 189No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×16—
Broad rise in production and innovation2.2 Inception— No route · rank 189No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×15—
Broad rise in trade and investment2.4 Inception— No route · rank 189No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×12—
Assured space services0.3 Inception— No route · rank 189No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×22—
Frontier AI and compute0.2 Inception— No route · rank 189No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×17—
Higher-value manufacturing1.2 Inception— No route · rank 189No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×19—
Reliable low-cost energy1.6 Inception— No route · rank 189No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×9.6—
Secure food and water supply2.9 Inception— No route · rank 189No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×9.3—
More deployable joint force1.2 Inception— No route · rank 189No route found · closest 0.1 of 1.5×34—
Adaptable skilled workforce2.3 Inception— No route · rank 189No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×15—
Stronger health and biotechnology2.4 Inception— No route · rank 189No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Stronger information environment3.6 Nascent— No route · rank 189No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×17—
Wider international influence2.1 Inception— No route · rank 189No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×17—
Capable digital government2.7 Inception— No route · rank 189No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.3—
Trusted public institutions2.2 Inception— No route · rank 189No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.3—
Deeper long-term finance2.5 Inception— No route · rank 189No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×13—
Research translated into value1.4 Inception— No route · rank 189No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—
Higher-value international business1.9 Inception— No route · rank 189No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×12—
Sophisticated export strength2.7 Inception— No route · rank 189No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—