Gulf and Middle East · IRN

Iran

Baseline index 8.17Rank 65 of 197FoundationalGulf and Middle EastAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Stretched developers. Exposed to food and funding shocks; debt relief and better yields are their upside. One of 27 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
18.1
rank 118 of 197 · 3 years: 17.9
Worst case
−12.3%
Breadbasket failure · tail −11.3%
Opportunity · 10 years
−1.4
rank 72 of 197 · 3 years: −1.3
Best case
+25
Water-efficient food leap · gainer in 2 of 10
Shock absorbed
32%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.24
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
9of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance
weakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Breadbasket failure, Regional war spillover, AI labour shock. Highest exposure indicators: staple foods among the top five imports; land borders with states in conflict or collapse; refugees hosted per head of population; consumer price inflation; industry as a share of gdp; internet users as a share of population; youth unemployment rate; urban share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Iran’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Breadbasket failure S06High 0.93−1.00−1.47−0.64▼ 524Monetary & Currency Capability 4.1 · Nascent
Regional war spillover S03High 1.00−0.92−1.48−0.65▼ 324Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 4.6 · Nascent
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.85−0.84−1.11−0.49▼ 318Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 2.4 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.80−0.72−1.03−0.45▼ 121Justice System & Fundamental Rights 2.8 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.61−0.66−0.91−0.40016Political Institutions & Civic Participation 3.7 · Nascent
Core disaster S07High 0.68−0.63−0.96−0.42▼ 313Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 5.1 · Nascent
Severe pandemic S10Medium 0.54−0.55−0.84−0.37014Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 5.5 · Nascent
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.51−0.53−0.76−0.33016Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.9 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02Medium 0.40−0.38−0.49−0.22▼ 18Financial Stability & Crisis Management 3.8 · Nascent
Hybrid coercion S04Medium 0.55−0.37−0.61−0.27010Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 6.5 · Foundational

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Breadbasket failure−0.53−1.24−0.48−1.17−1.11−1.19−1.27−0.96−1.09
Regional war spillover−0.51−1.22−1.22−0.47−0.47−1.17−1.09−0.93−1.20
Legitimacy rupture−0.48−0.53−1.06−0.48−1.12−1.56−1.28−0.48−0.55
Cryptographic trust break−0.92−0.50−1.01·−1.12−1.05−0.98−0.42−0.48
AI labour shock−0.74−0.34·−0.89−0.78−0.92−0.78−0.77−0.77
Core disaster−0.03−0.95−0.34−0.75−0.34−0.84−0.90−0.77−0.77
Severe pandemic−0.58−0.29−0.26−0.70−0.61−0.66−0.61−0.60−0.60
Trade bloc rupture−0.69−0.26−0.26−0.26−0.62−0.60−0.62−0.61−0.83
Global funding seizure−0.23−0.25·−0.25−0.23−0.52−0.84−0.59−0.52
Hybrid coercion−0.27−0.59−0.64·−0.66−0.68·−0.25−0.25
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Iran is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Gainer+25.328.53.2399Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 6.7 · Foundational
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+16.321.85.54067Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 6.7 · Foundational
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed+9.027.518.53570Justice System & Fundamental Rights 4.5 · Nascent
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Mixed+7.329.522.23952Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 6.5 · Foundational
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−3.66.610.232149Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 4.3 · Nascent
Great-power détente S13 ↗Mixed−4.711.716.42764Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 4 · Nascent
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed−6.314.620.829105Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 4.3 · Nascent
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−10.317.427.62967Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 4 · Nascent
Market access opening S12 ↗Loser−15.212.627.931140Investment Attraction & Projection 4.7 · Nascent
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Loser−18.012.530.540164Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 6.7 · Foundational

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Iran, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function8.4 Foundational → Nascent4.1% Possible · rank 32Legitimacy rupture Severe + Breadbasket failure Severe×1.8Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 4.3
Loss of financial stability6.1 Foundational → Inception3.5% Possible · rank 23Legitimacy rupture Severe + Breadbasket failure Majorplans fail×2.1Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 4.3
Food and water failure10.9 Transitional → Foundational3.2% Possible · rank 3Breadbasket failure Extreme×1.6Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4.6
Broad fall in governance and integrity6.8 Foundational → Nascent2.7% Possible · rank 17Legitimacy rupture Severe + Breadbasket failure Majorplans fail×1.9Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 4.3
Rupture in trade and supply7.9 Foundational → Nascent2.1% Possible · rank 21Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Majorplans fail×1.8Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 6.5
Collapse in energy security10.5 Transitional → Foundational2.0% Possible · rank 5Regional war spillover Major + Breadbasket failure Severeplans fail×1.9Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4.6
Rule of law failure4.8 Nascent → Inception1.9% Possible · rank 11Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×1.9Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 4.3
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure10.8 Transitional → Foundational1.5% Possible · rank 1Regional war spillover Severe + Breadbasket failure Majorplans fail×2.4Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 6.5
Broad fall in financial strength5.8 Nascent → Inception1.4% Possible · rank 71Legitimacy rupture Severe + Breadbasket failure Severeplans fail×2.3Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4.6
Health system failure10.7 Transitional → Foundational1.3% Possible · rank 23Breadbasket failure Severe + Core disaster Majorplans fail×2.1Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4.6
Breakdown of information trust8.1 Foundational → Nascent1.2% Possible · rank 30Legitimacy rupture Extreme + Breadbasket failure Major×1.9Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 4.3
Broad fall in trade and investment6.5 Foundational → Nascent1.0% Unlikely · rank 31Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.5Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 6.5
Defence readiness failure11.8 Transitional → Foundational1.0% Unlikely · rank 8Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.5Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 6.5
Broad fall in information and influence8.4 Foundational → Nascent1.0% Unlikely · rank 31Legitimacy rupture Severe + Breadbasket failure Severeplans fail×2.7Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4.6
Broad fall in national security10.3 Transitional → Foundational0.9% Unlikely · rank 6Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.5Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 6.5
Diplomatic isolation7.8 Foundational → Nascent0.8% Unlikely · rank 41Legitimacy rupture Severe + Breadbasket failure Severeplans fail×2.4Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4.6
Loss of strategic deterrence7.6 Foundational → Nascent0.8% Unlikely · rank 2Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.4Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 6.5
Strategic awareness failure10.4 Transitional → Foundational0.6% Unlikely · rank 62Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.1Quantum Technologies 4.5
Broad fall in production and innovation7.9 Foundational → Nascent0.4% Unlikely · rank 45Regional war spillover Major + Breadbasket failure Extremeplans fail×3.1Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4.6
Loss of industrial capacity9.3 Transitional → Foundational0.4% Unlikely · rank 61Regional war spillover Major + Breadbasket failure Extremeplans fail×3.1Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4.6
Failure of digital lifelines8.9 Foundational → Nascent0.4% Unlikely · rank 46Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.7Quantum Technologies 4.5
Broad fall in human capital9.8 Transitional → Foundational0.3% Unlikely · rank 34Legitimacy rupture Major + Breadbasket failure Extremeplans fail×2.6Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4.6
Education pipeline failure10.3 Transitional → Foundational0.2% Unlikely · rank 20Legitimacy rupture Major + Breadbasket failure Extremeplans fail×2.5Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4.6
Broad fall in critical technology7.1 Foundational → Nascent0.1% Remote · rank 41Trade bloc rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×3.3Quantum Technologies 4.5
Loss of advanced technology base6.5 Foundational → Nascent0.1% Remote · rank 37Trade bloc rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×3.6Quantum Technologies 4.5
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Stronger health and biotechnology10.2 Transitional → Transitional0.8% Unlikely · rank 61Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Major×2.0Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 6.5
Secure food and water supply10.9 Transitional → Established0.8% Unlikely · rank 31Water-efficient food leap Extreme + Automated discovery step Major×1.8Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 6.7
Capable digital government9.4 Transitional → Transitional0.2% Remote · rank 70Water-efficient food leap Severe + Chronic disease advance Extreme×2.5Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 6.5
Trusted public institutions5.3 Nascent → Foundational0.1% Remote · rank 70Public service leap Extreme + Chronic disease advance Extreme×2.7Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 6.5
Broad rise in governance and integrity6.8 Foundational → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 70Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.6Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 6.5
Frontier AI and compute5.0 Nascent → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 58Automated discovery step Extreme + Chronic disease advance Extreme×2.9Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 4
Research translated into value8.2 Foundational → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 56Water-efficient food leap Extreme + Automated discovery step Extreme×2.6Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 6.7
Broad rise in critical technology7.1 Foundational → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 58Water-efficient food leap Extreme + Chronic disease advance Extreme×3.1Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 6.5
Broad rise in human capital9.8 Transitional → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 60Water-efficient food leap Extreme + Chronic disease advance Extreme×3.0Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 6.5
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure10.8 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 63Middle East settlement Extreme + Water-efficient food leap Extreme×2.7Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 6.7
Reliable low-cost energy8.7 Foundational → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 73Middle East settlement Extreme + Water-efficient food leap Extreme×2.4Justice System & Fundamental Rights 4.5
Wider international influence7.8 Foundational → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 51Great-power détente Extreme + Middle East settlement Extreme×2.2Justice System & Fundamental Rights 4.5
Broad rise in national security10.3 Transitional— No route · rank 65No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.3—
Broad rise in information and influence8.4 Foundational— No route · rank 66No route found · closest 1.5 of 1.5×2.7—
Broad rise in financial strength5.8 Nascent— No route · rank 65No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×2.9—
Broad rise in production and innovation7.9 Foundational— No route · rank 65No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.1—
Broad rise in trade and investment6.5 Foundational— No route · rank 74No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.5—
Assured space services8.7 Foundational— No route · rank 65No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.7—
Higher-value manufacturing9.0 Transitional— No route · rank 65No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.5—
More deployable joint force11.0 Transitional— No route · rank 65No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.6—
Adaptable skilled workforce7.8 Foundational— No route · rank 68No route found · closest 1.5 of 1.5×2.8—
Stronger information environment9.0 Transitional— No route · rank 65No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.4—
Deeper long-term finance6.9 Foundational— No route · rank 66No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.9—
Higher-value international business5.4 Nascent— No route · rank 76No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.5—
Sophisticated export strength6.5 Foundational— No route · rank 66No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.5—