Gulf and Middle East · IRQ

Iraq

Baseline index 4.69Rank 126 of 197NascentGulf and Middle EastAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Fuel-dependent. Budgets built on oil, gas and commodities: two of the upside scenarios are their downside. One of 15 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
30.7
rank 71 of 197 · 3 years: 30.2
Worst case
−21.3%
Regional war spillover · tail −19.3%
Opportunity · 10 years
−22.0
rank 182 of 197 · 3 years: −22.2
Best case
+5
Water-efficient food leap · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
19%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.30
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
7of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Investment Attraction & Projection
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Trade bloc rupture. Highest exposure indicators: oil, gas and coal among the top five exports of a net exporter; industry as a share of gdp; youth unemployment rate; adult obesity rate; internet users as a share of population; share of population aged under 15.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Iraq’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.90−1.00−1.30−0.57▼ 426Maritime Power 1.2 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.84−0.86−1.08−0.47▼ 220Investment Attraction & Projection 2.3 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.80−0.85−0.98−0.44▼ 423Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.61−0.75−0.88−0.40▼ 120Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01High 0.61−0.72−0.88−0.39▼ 219Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10Medium 0.50−0.62−0.77−0.34▲ 417Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.44−0.54−0.68−0.30▲ 118Trade Facilitation & Logistics 4 · Nascent
Hybrid coercion S04Medium 0.54−0.48−0.60−0.26014Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Core disaster S07Medium 0.42−0.46−0.59−0.26▲ 411Financial System Depth & Access 3.6 · Nascent
Global funding seizure S02Low 0.31−0.31−0.38−0.17▲ 56Investment Attraction & Projection 2.6 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.53−1.34−1.24−0.52−0.52−1.29−1.21−1.03−1.33
Legitimacy rupture−0.47−0.55−1.01−0.50−1.17−1.64−1.34−0.50−0.58
Cryptographic trust break−0.92−0.62−1.14·−1.38−1.29−1.21−0.52−0.59
AI labour shock−0.71−0.38·−1.02−0.89−1.05−0.89−0.88−0.88
Trade bloc rupture−0.78−0.37−0.33−0.37−0.87−0.83−0.87−0.85−1.17
Severe pandemic−0.60−0.33−0.27−0.81−0.71−0.76−0.71−0.69−0.69
Breadbasket failure−0.28−0.67−0.23−0.63−0.60−0.64−0.69−0.51−0.59
Hybrid coercion−0.35−0.77−0.77·−0.86−0.88·−0.32−0.32
Core disaster−0.02−0.69−0.22−0.54−0.25−0.61−0.65−0.56−0.56
Global funding seizure−0.19−0.21·−0.21−0.19−0.42−0.69−0.48−0.43
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Iraq is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed+5.19.03.91973Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.2 · Inception
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed+2.79.56.819125Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.2 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Mixed+2.514.411.91966Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.2 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−8.13.211.326185Financial System Depth & Access 4.6 · Nascent
Public service leap S18 ↗Loser−11.810.121.917151Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.8 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−15.86.021.812136Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.3 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Loser−27.811.339.121181Investment Attraction & Projection 3.3 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Loser−29.318.547.928177Justice System & Fundamental Rights 5 · Nascent
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−32.14.636.78163Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.3 · Inception
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Loser−67.56.073.517189Energy Technologies 1.6 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Iraq, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function6.3 Foundational → Nascent3.1% Possible · rank 77Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severe×1.7Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4.7
Broad fall in governance and integrity5.6 Nascent → Inception2.3% Possible · rank 27Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×1.8Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4.7
Loss of financial stability5.0 Nascent → Inception1.7% Possible · rank 106Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Extreme×2.0Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4.7
Rupture in trade and supply5.0 Nascent → Inception1.4% Possible · rank 47Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×1.7Maritime Power 3.3
Breakdown of information trust4.7 Nascent → Inception1.2% Possible · rank 32Hybrid coercion Major + Legitimacy rupture Extreme×1.8Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4.7
Rule of law failure5.0 Nascent → Inception1.2% Possible · rank 34Hybrid coercion Major + Legitimacy rupture Extreme×1.8Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4.7
Broad fall in financial strength4.7 Nascent → Inception1.1% Possible · rank 96Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.2Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4.7
Collapse in energy security5.8 Nascent → Inception1.0% Possible · rank 34Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×1.7Maritime Power 3.3
Defence readiness failure6.7 Foundational → Nascent0.9% Unlikely · rank 10Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.3Maritime Power 3.3
Strategic awareness failure3.8 Nascent → Inception0.9% Unlikely · rank 50Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×1.7Quantum Technologies 0.5
Broad fall in trade and investment4.1 Nascent → Inception0.7% Unlikely · rank 50Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.3Maritime Power 3.3
Broad fall in information and influence5.0 Nascent → Inception0.7% Unlikely · rank 58Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×2.2Quantum Technologies 0.5
Diplomatic isolation5.3 Nascent → Inception0.5% Unlikely · rank 67Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×2.2Quantum Technologies 0.5
Broad fall in national security4.8 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 43Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.4Quantum Technologies 0.5
Health system failure7.0 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 158Breadbasket failure Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.2
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure6.4 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 82Regional war spillover Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail×2.2Maritime Power 3.3
Broad fall in production and innovation4.4 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 120Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.9Maritime Power 3.3
Loss of industrial capacity5.6 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 139Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.9Maritime Power 3.3
Food and water failure7.0 Foundational → Nascent0.1% Remote · rank 161Breadbasket failure Extreme + Core disaster Severeplans fail×2.9Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.6
Failure of digital lifelines4.9 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 90Hybrid coercion Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.3Quantum Technologies 0.5
Broad fall in human capital5.9 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 181Breadbasket failure Extreme + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×2.9Artificial Intelligence 1.3
Education pipeline failure6.4 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 185Breadbasket failure Extreme + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×3.1Artificial Intelligence 1.3
Broad fall in critical technology1.3 Inception— No route · rank 127Already at the foot of the scale×3.3—
Loss of advanced technology base0.8 Inception— No route · rank 127Already at the foot of the scale×4.5—
Loss of strategic deterrence1.9 Inception— No route · rank 127Already at the foot of the scale×2.9—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology1.3 Inception— No route · rank 126No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.3—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure6.4 Foundational— No route · rank 126No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.2—
Broad rise in national security4.8 Nascent— No route · rank 126No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×4.9—
Broad rise in human capital5.9 Nascent— No route · rank 126No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.3—
Broad rise in information and influence5.0 Nascent— No route · rank 126No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.0—
Broad rise in governance and integrity5.6 Nascent— No route · rank 126No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×3.9—
Broad rise in financial strength4.7 Nascent— No route · rank 126No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.0—
Broad rise in production and innovation4.4 Nascent— No route · rank 126No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.8—
Broad rise in trade and investment4.1 Nascent— No route · rank 126No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.6—
Assured space services1.5 Inception— No route · rank 126No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Frontier AI and compute0.8 Inception— No route · rank 126No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.9—
Higher-value manufacturing3.1 Nascent— No route · rank 126No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.3—
Reliable low-cost energy3.4 Nascent— No route · rank 126No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×3.6—
Secure food and water supply7.0 Foundational— No route · rank 126No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.4—
More deployable joint force5.8 Nascent— No route · rank 126No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×5.4—
Adaptable skilled workforce4.8 Nascent— No route · rank 126No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.1—
Stronger health and biotechnology5.4 Nascent— No route · rank 126No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.2—
Stronger information environment4.7 Nascent— No route · rank 126No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.4—
Wider international influence5.3 Nascent— No route · rank 126No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×3.2—
Capable digital government6.0 Foundational— No route · rank 126No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.6—
Trusted public institutions4.8 Nascent— No route · rank 126No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.3—
Deeper long-term finance4.8 Nascent— No route · rank 126No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.9—
Research translated into value3.9 Nascent— No route · rank 126No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×8.3—
Higher-value international business3.6 Nascent— No route · rank 126No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.3—
Sophisticated export strength4.1 Nascent— No route · rank 126No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.6—