Europe · IRL

Ireland

Baseline index 12.08Rank 28 of 197EstablishedEuropeAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Anchors. Absorb most shocks and take most of the upside. One of 27 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
10.7
rank 159 of 197 · 3 years: 10.5
Worst case
−7.2%
Regional war spillover · tail −6.0%
Opportunity · 10 years
+23.0
rank 21 of 197 · 3 years: +22.9
Best case
+48
Outbreak defence succeeds · gainer in 8 of 10
Shock absorbed
47%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.11
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Energy Infrastructure
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, Hybrid coercion, Trade bloc rupture. Highest exposure indicators: few months of imports covered by reserves; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; internet users as a share of population; share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; refugees hosted per head of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Ireland’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.96−0.87−1.39−0.61▼ 225Strategic Strike & Missile Defence 0.2 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.89−0.67−1.14−0.49019Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 4.4 · Nascent
Severe pandemic S10High 0.84−0.65−1.30−0.57019Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.7 · Transitional
Trade bloc rupture S01High 0.85−0.64−1.26−0.55▼ 118Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 6.4 · Foundational
AI labour shock S08High 0.84−0.59−1.25−0.54020Artificial Intelligence 8.5 · Foundational
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.74−0.52−0.82−0.36▼ 117Maritime Power 2.6 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02High 0.81−0.47−1.02−0.44▼ 114Economic Output & Productivity 11.4 · Transitional
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.39−0.30−0.61−0.27▲ 111Energy Infrastructure 9.2 · Transitional
Legitimacy rupture S05Medium 0.40−0.24−0.51−0.22▲ 211Force Generation & Mobilisation 6.8 · Foundational
Core disaster S07Low 0.31−0.20−0.43−0.19▲ 28Energy Infrastructure 9.3 · Transitional

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.49−1.17−1.08−0.45−0.45−1.12−1.05−0.90−1.15
Cryptographic trust break−0.87−0.47−0.87·−1.06−0.99−0.92−0.40−0.45
Severe pandemic−0.69−0.34−0.28−0.84−0.73−0.78−0.73−0.72−0.72
Trade bloc rupture−0.84−0.32−0.29−0.32−0.75−0.72−0.75−0.74−1.01
AI labour shock−0.66−0.30·−0.80−0.70−0.82−0.70−0.68−0.68
Hybrid coercion−0.39−0.85−0.85·−0.94−0.97·−0.35−0.35
Global funding seizure−0.28−0.31·−0.31−0.28−0.63−1.03−0.73−0.64
Breadbasket failure−0.16−0.37−0.13−0.35−0.33−0.36−0.38−0.29−0.33
Legitimacy rupture−0.14−0.15−0.27−0.14−0.32−0.44−0.36−0.14−0.16
Core disaster−0.01−0.30−0.10−0.23−0.11−0.26−0.28−0.24−0.24
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Ireland is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+48.149.51.46120Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11 · Transitional
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Gainer+38.138.30.24220Energy Technologies 4.8 · Nascent
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Gainer+30.848.417.66321Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11 · Transitional
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Gainer+29.042.013.04723Robotics & Autonomous Systems 7.5 · Foundational
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Gainer+25.226.00.85026Intelligence & Assessment 7.5 · Foundational
Great-power détente S13 ↗Gainer+24.637.412.75315Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 8 · Foundational
Market access opening S12 ↗Gainer+17.035.018.06020Energy Infrastructure 9.8 · Transitional
Public service leap S18 ↗Gainer+10.214.03.86029Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 9.6 · Transitional
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed+0.77.97.26298Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11 · Transitional
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−5.30.86.161167Energy Infrastructure 9.8 · Transitional

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Ireland, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function14.9 Established → Transitional4.1% Possible · rank 35Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail×2.2Maritime Power 4
Loss of financial stability14.4 Established → Transitional3.3% Possible · rank 28Global funding seizure Major + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.7Maritime Power 4
Broad fall in financial strength14.4 Established → Transitional1.9% Possible · rank 31Global funding seizure Major + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.9Maritime Power 4
Broad fall in governance and integrity15.1 Advanced → Transitional1.9% Possible · rank 53Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×2.7Maritime Power 4
Strategic awareness failure6.1 Foundational → Inception1.6% Possible · rank 24Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Quantum Technologies 6
Broad fall in trade and investment14.5 Established → Transitional1.5% Possible · rank 11Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.6Maritime Power 4
Collapse in energy security7.3 Foundational → Nascent1.4% Possible · rank 14Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail×2.0Maritime Power 4
Diplomatic isolation11.8 Transitional → Foundational1.3% Possible · rank 8Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.8Quantum Technologies 6
Breakdown of information trust13.0 Established → Transitional1.1% Possible · rank 39Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.8Quantum Technologies 6
Rupture in trade and supply13.7 Established → Transitional1.1% Possible · rank 72Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×1.9Maritime Power 4
Broad fall in information and influence12.4 Established → Transitional1.0% Unlikely · rank 27Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.8Quantum Technologies 6
Rule of law failure15.4 Advanced → Established0.8% Unlikely · rank 69Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.8Quantum Technologies 6
Failure of digital lifelines13.0 Established → Transitional0.8% Unlikely · rank 16Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.8Quantum Technologies 6
Broad fall in production and innovation14.3 Established → Transitional0.7% Unlikely · rank 15Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×3.3Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 13.6
Loss of industrial capacity13.6 Established → Transitional0.7% Unlikely · rank 23Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×3.3Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 13.6
Health system failure14.7 Established → Transitional0.6% Unlikely · rank 89Breadbasket failure Major + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×2.4Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure11.6 Transitional → Foundational0.6% Unlikely · rank 35Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×2.6Maritime Power 4
Loss of advanced technology base6.0 Foundational → Inception0.5% Unlikely · rank 3Trade bloc rupture Extremeplans fail×3.1Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 12.3
Defence readiness failure4.8 Nascent → Inception0.5% Unlikely · rank 26Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.7Maritime Power 4
Broad fall in critical technology7.1 Foundational → Nascent0.4% Unlikely · rank 7Trade bloc rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.5Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 12.3
Broad fall in national security4.3 Nascent → Inception0.4% Unlikely · rank 33Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.8Quantum Technologies 6
Broad fall in human capital15.0 Established → Transitional0.3% Unlikely · rank 31Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11
Food and water failure12.8 Established → Transitional0.2% Remote · rank 132Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×3.3Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 6
Education pipeline failure15.2 Advanced → Established0.1% Remote · rank 75Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.8Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11
Loss of strategic deterrence1.6 Inception— No route · rank 47Already at the foot of the scale×3.3—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Capable digital government15.3 Advanced → Advanced8.8% Likely · rank 20Chronic disease advance Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11
Frontier AI and compute8.8 Foundational → Transitional8.4% Likely · rank 21Automated discovery step Severe + Chronic disease advance Major×1.2Robotics & Autonomous Systems 7.5
Stronger health and biotechnology13.4 Established → Advanced8.1% Likely · rank 22Chronic disease advance Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.2Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11
Broad rise in governance and integrity15.1 Advanced → Advanced7.0% Likely · rank 24Chronic disease advance Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11
Trusted public institutions15.2 Advanced → Advanced5.4% Likely · rank 23Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11
Reliable low-cost energy7.3 Foundational → Foundational5.2% Likely · rank 17Market access opening Major + Clean power threshold Severe×1.3Energy Technologies 4.8
Sophisticated export strength14.7 Established → Advanced5.1% Likely · rank 15Market access opening Major + Great-power détente Severe×1.3Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 8
Broad rise in critical technology7.1 Foundational → Foundational5.1% Likely · rank 21Automated discovery step Extreme×1.6Robotics & Autonomous Systems 7.5
Higher-value manufacturing10.6 Transitional → Established3.8% Possible · rank 20Automated discovery step Extreme×1.6Robotics & Autonomous Systems 7.5
Research translated into value15.0 Advanced → Advanced3.6% Possible · rank 22Automated discovery step Extreme×1.4Robotics & Autonomous Systems 7.5
Broad rise in trade and investment14.5 Established → Advanced3.3% Possible · rank 19Market access opening Severe + Great-power détente Severe×1.6Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 8
Higher-value international business15.5 Advanced → Advanced3.3% Possible · rank 16Market access opening Severe + Great-power détente Severe×1.7Energy Infrastructure 9.8
Broad rise in human capital15.0 Established → Advanced3.1% Possible · rank 23Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.8Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure11.6 Transitional → Established2.8% Possible · rank 20Automated discovery step Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.8Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11
Broad rise in production and innovation14.3 Established → Advanced2.3% Possible · rank 20Automated discovery step Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11
Adaptable skilled workforce14.5 Established → Advanced1.2% Possible · rank 23Chronic disease advance Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11
Secure food and water supply12.8 Established → Established1.1% Possible · rank 25Automated discovery step Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11
Broad rise in information and influence12.4 Established → Established1.1% Possible · rank 15Chronic disease advance Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×1.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11
Wider international influence11.8 Transitional → Established1.1% Possible · rank 17Great-power détente Extreme + Automated discovery step Major×1.6Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 8
Broad rise in financial strength14.4 Established → Advanced0.8% Unlikely · rank 24Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Major×1.8Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11
Stronger information environment13.1 Established → Established0.8% Unlikely · rank 20Chronic disease advance Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×1.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11
Deeper long-term finance14.3 Established → Advanced0.4% Unlikely · rank 28Clean power threshold Extreme + Chronic disease advance Major×2.1Energy Technologies 4.8
Assured space services3.4 Nascent → Nascent0.4% Unlikely · rank 24Automated discovery step Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.3Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11
Broad rise in national security4.3 Nascent → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 16Great-power détente Severe + Automated discovery step Extreme×2.4Robotics & Autonomous Systems 7.5
More deployable joint force5.0 Nascent → Foundational0.3% Unlikely · rank 16Great-power détente Severe + Automated discovery step Extreme×2.4Robotics & Autonomous Systems 7.5