Gulf and Middle East · JOR

Jordan

Baseline index 7.50Rank 74 of 197FoundationalGulf and Middle EastAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Low vulnerability, and gains from open markets and digital public services. One of 39 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
19.5
rank 113 of 197 · 3 years: 19.2
Worst case
−12.6%
Regional war spillover · tail −11.3%
Opportunity · 10 years
+8.1
rank 45 of 197 · 3 years: +8.4
Best case
+39
Middle East settlement · gainer in 5 of 10
Shock absorbed
30%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.25
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
4of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Maritime Power
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Trade bloc rupture. Highest exposure indicators: land borders with states in conflict or collapse; share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; refugees hosted per head of population; youth unemployment rate; little renewable water per head; adult obesity rate; internet users as a share of population; urban share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Jordan’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.93−0.95−1.35−0.59▼ 222Maritime Power 0.8 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.88−0.85−1.10−0.49▼ 222Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.8 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.70−0.74−1.04−0.46▼ 120Artificial Intelligence 2.8 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.80−0.73−1.03−0.45▼ 220Information Environment & Strategic Communication 5.3 · Nascent
Severe pandemic S10High 0.64−0.67−0.98−0.43016Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.1 · Nascent
Core disaster S07High 0.71−0.63−1.00−0.44▼ 217Industrial & Sectoral Base 6.4 · Foundational
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.58−0.59−0.84−0.37▼ 116Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.51−0.53−0.80−0.35012Energy Infrastructure 7 · Foundational
Global funding seizure S02High 0.61−0.51−0.76−0.33▼ 110Economic Output & Productivity 5.3 · Nascent
Hybrid coercion S04Medium 0.59−0.45−0.66−0.29▲ 111Maritime Power 1.5 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.53−1.26−1.17−0.49−0.49−1.21−1.13−0.97−1.25
Cryptographic trust break−1.06−0.60−1.11·−1.34−1.26−1.17−0.50−0.57
AI labour shock−0.80−0.37·−1.00−0.87−1.03−0.87−0.85−0.85
Legitimacy rupture−0.43−0.47−0.85−0.43−0.99−1.38−1.13−0.43−0.49
Severe pandemic−0.70−0.36−0.29−0.87−0.76−0.82−0.76−0.75−0.75
Core disaster−0.03−0.95−0.31−0.76−0.34−0.85−0.91−0.78−0.78
Trade bloc rupture−0.72−0.30−0.27−0.30−0.71−0.68−0.71−0.69−0.95
Breadbasket failure−0.28−0.66−0.23−0.62−0.59−0.64−0.68−0.51−0.58
Global funding seizure−0.31−0.34·−0.34−0.31−0.69−1.13−0.79−0.70
Hybrid coercion−0.33−0.72−0.72·−0.80−0.83·−0.30−0.30
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Jordan is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Gainer+39.042.13.1425Justice System & Fundamental Rights 7.5 · Foundational
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Gainer+16.521.24.72854Energy Technologies 3.6 · Nascent
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+15.720.85.03369Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.4 · Nascent
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Gainer+15.017.92.93227Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.4 · Nascent
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Gainer+14.026.112.13345Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.4 · Nascent
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed+4.413.18.74241Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 7.7 · Foundational
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed+4.124.820.74157Technical & Vocational Skills 7.5 · Foundational
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed−0.118.218.33076Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3.8 · Nascent
Great-power détente S13 ↗Mixed−3.011.314.32159Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.5 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−12.08.820.81468Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.5 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Jordan, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function9.4 Transitional → Foundational4.0% Possible · rank 36Hybrid coercion Major + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.0Political Institutions & Civic Participation 7
Loss of financial stability8.8 Foundational → Nascent2.0% Possible · rank 87Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.4Maritime Power 2.8
Broad fall in governance and integrity8.6 Foundational → Nascent1.8% Possible · rank 65Hybrid coercion Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.2Political Institutions & Civic Participation 7
Broad fall in financial strength8.6 Foundational → Nascent1.5% Possible · rank 60Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.6Maritime Power 2.8
Rupture in trade and supply8.0 Foundational → Nascent1.4% Possible · rank 46Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×1.8Maritime Power 2.8
Rule of law failure7.7 Foundational → Nascent1.1% Possible · rank 36Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.1Quantum Technologies 1
Collapse in energy security6.3 Foundational → Inception1.0% Possible · rank 36Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×1.9Maritime Power 2.8
Strategic awareness failure5.9 Nascent → Inception1.0% Unlikely · rank 47Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×1.8Quantum Technologies 1
Breakdown of information trust7.3 Foundational → Nascent0.9% Unlikely · rank 61Hybrid coercion Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.1Political Institutions & Civic Participation 7
Broad fall in trade and investment8.2 Foundational → Nascent0.8% Unlikely · rank 39Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.4Maritime Power 2.8
Food and water failure9.8 Transitional → Foundational0.7% Unlikely · rank 52Breadbasket failure Severe + Core disaster Severeplans fail×2.9Financial System Depth & Access 8.4
Health system failure10.0 Transitional → Foundational0.6% Unlikely · rank 88Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×2.3Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.4
Broad fall in national security6.5 Foundational → Nascent0.6% Unlikely · rank 19Regional war spillover Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.6Quantum Technologies 1
Broad fall in information and influence8.2 Foundational → Nascent0.5% Unlikely · rank 66Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 1
Diplomatic isolation8.9 Foundational → Nascent0.5% Unlikely · rank 62Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 1
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure8.6 Foundational → Nascent0.5% Unlikely · rank 46Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail×2.4Maritime Power 2.8
Defence readiness failure8.3 Foundational → Nascent0.4% Unlikely · rank 27Hybrid coercion Major + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×2.5Political Institutions & Civic Participation 7
Loss of industrial capacity7.3 Foundational → Nascent0.4% Unlikely · rank 58Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×3.1Maritime Power 2.8
Failure of digital lifelines8.0 Foundational → Nascent0.4% Unlikely · rank 47Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 1
Broad fall in production and innovation7.1 Foundational → Nascent0.4% Unlikely · rank 59Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×3.1Maritime Power 2.8
Broad fall in human capital9.0 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 119Breadbasket failure Severe + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×3.0Artificial Intelligence 4.3
Education pipeline failure9.5 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 98Breadbasket failure Severe + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×3.2Artificial Intelligence 4.3
Broad fall in critical technology2.7 Inception— No route · rank 76Already at the foot of the scale×2.8—
Loss of advanced technology base1.6 Inception— No route · rank 76Already at the foot of the scale×3.4—
Loss of strategic deterrence2.8 Inception— No route · rank 76Already at the foot of the scale×3.1—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Trusted public institutions7.8 Foundational → Transitional0.8% Unlikely · rank 47Market access opening Major + Middle East settlement Extreme×1.9Justice System & Fundamental Rights 7.5
Reliable low-cost energy5.8 Nascent → Foundational0.8% Unlikely · rank 45Market access opening Major + Middle East settlement Extreme×1.6Justice System & Fundamental Rights 7.5
Broad rise in governance and integrity8.6 Foundational → Transitional0.8% Unlikely · rank 53Market access opening Major + Middle East settlement Extreme×1.7Justice System & Fundamental Rights 7.5
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure8.6 Foundational → Transitional0.8% Unlikely · rank 31Market access opening Major + Middle East settlement Extreme×1.8Justice System & Fundamental Rights 7.5
Wider international influence8.9 Foundational → Transitional0.8% Unlikely · rank 25Market access opening Major + Middle East settlement Extreme×1.4Justice System & Fundamental Rights 7.5
Capable digital government9.6 Transitional → Transitional0.4% Unlikely · rank 62Market access opening Severe + Middle East settlement Extreme×2.0Justice System & Fundamental Rights 7.5
Broad rise in information and influence8.2 Foundational → Transitional0.3% Unlikely · rank 32Market access opening Severe + Middle East settlement Extreme×1.8Justice System & Fundamental Rights 7.5
Stronger health and biotechnology8.1 Foundational → Transitional0.3% Unlikely · rank 70Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×2.3Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.4
Secure food and water supply9.8 Transitional → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 55Market access opening Extreme + Middle East settlement Extreme×2.4Justice System & Fundamental Rights 7.5
Higher-value international business8.0 Foundational → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 55Market access opening Extreme + Clean power threshold Extreme×2.4Technical & Vocational Skills 7.5
Broad rise in trade and investment8.2 Foundational → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 69Market access opening Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.6Technical & Vocational Skills 7.5
Broad rise in critical technology2.7 Inception— No route · rank 74No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.5—
Broad rise in national security6.5 Foundational— No route · rank 74No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×2.2—
Broad rise in human capital9.0 Foundational— No route · rank 75No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.5—
Broad rise in financial strength8.6 Foundational— No route · rank 74No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.3—
Broad rise in production and innovation7.1 Foundational— No route · rank 74No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.7—
Assured space services2.6 Inception— No route · rank 74No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.8—
Frontier AI and compute2.4 Inception— No route · rank 74No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.8—
Higher-value manufacturing5.3 Nascent— No route · rank 74No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.7—
More deployable joint force7.6 Foundational— No route · rank 74No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×2.4—
Adaptable skilled workforce7.6 Foundational— No route · rank 76No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.2—
Stronger information environment7.4 Foundational → Transitional— Remote · rank 74Middle East settlement Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.4Justice System & Fundamental Rights 7.5
Deeper long-term finance8.8 Foundational— No route · rank 74No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.8—
Research translated into value6.8 Foundational— No route · rank 75No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×4.0—
Sophisticated export strength8.3 Foundational— No route · rank 74No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.0—