Indo-Pacific · KIR

Kiribati

Baseline index 2.21Rank 186 of 197InceptionIndo-PacificAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Acute fragility. Every scenario is severe; there is little capability left to lose. One of 14 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
77.3
rank 7 of 197 · 3 years: 76.7
Worst case
−45.0%
Regional war spillover · tail −42.3%
Opportunity · 10 years
−12.6
rank 149 of 197 · 3 years: −12.1
Best case
+3
Clean power threshold · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
10%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.38
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
4of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Breadbasket failure. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; adult obesity rate; internet users as a share of population; low real gdp per head; consumer price inflation; low life expectancy at birth; staple foods among the top five imports.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Kiribati’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.94−0.99−1.08−0.52▼ 215Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.83−0.95−1.03−0.48▼ 314Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06High 0.68−0.86−0.98−0.44▲ 115Energy Infrastructure 0.3 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.68−0.81−0.91−0.41▼ 116Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.87−0.75−0.79−0.39▼ 311Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.70−0.65−0.76−0.36▲ 215Force Generation & Mobilisation 0 · Inception
Core disaster S07Medium 0.57−0.65−0.76−0.34▼ 115Industrial & Sectoral Base 0.3 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.52−0.59−0.66−0.29▼ 111Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.71−0.56−0.60−0.29▼ 312Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02Medium 0.44−0.46−0.52−0.23▲ 312Investment Attraction & Projection 0 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.08−1.27−0.38−0.64−0.64−1.60−1.49−1.24−1.60
AI labour shock−0.08−0.53·−1.45−1.13−1.54−1.30−1.26−1.23
Breadbasket failure−0.08−1.06−0.24−1.09−1.04−1.12−1.19−0.89−1.02
Severe pandemic−0.08−0.49−0.25−1.22−0.98−1.14−1.06−1.04−1.04
Cryptographic trust break−0.08−0.70−0.37·−1.41−1.54−1.36−0.61−0.70
Legitimacy rupture−0.08−0.47−0.34−0.44−0.95−1.42−1.17−0.44−0.50
Core disaster−0.04−0.94−0.21−0.79−0.36−0.89−0.95−0.82−0.82
Trade bloc rupture−0.08−0.35−0.21−0.35−0.82−0.79−0.82−0.80−1.10
Hybrid coercion−0.08−1.05−0.38·−1.21−1.36·−0.50−0.50
Global funding seizure−0.06−0.33·−0.33−0.30−0.67−1.08−0.76−0.65
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Kiribati is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Mixed+3.35.32.07116Energy Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed+2.74.92.210102Intelligence & Assessment 0.5 · Inception
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed+1.35.23.98143Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−5.13.48.616166Energy Infrastructure 2.1 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Loser−11.66.518.29125Investment Attraction & Projection 1 · Inception
Public service leap S18 ↗Loser−12.06.718.79156Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Loser−12.55.117.67158Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−22.56.729.29182Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−23.91.625.52126Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−30.52.533.05184Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Kiribati, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function5.6 Nascent → Inception8.3% Likely · rank 3Regional war spillover Extreme×1.6Resource Infrastructure 0.5
Broad fall in governance and integrity4.8 Nascent → Inception4.3% Possible · rank 6Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severe×1.9Resource Infrastructure 0.5
Rule of law failure4.4 Nascent → Inception2.5% Possible · rank 5Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×1.8Quantum Technologies 0
Food and water failure3.2 Nascent → Inception2.0% Possible · rank 16Regional war spillover Severe + Breadbasket failure Severe×1.7Trade Facilitation & Logistics 2.5
Health system failure4.8 Nascent → Inception1.8% Possible · rank 8Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Severe×1.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0
Education pipeline failure4.4 Nascent → Inception0.2% Unlikely · rank 31Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.1Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0
Broad fall in human capital3.7 Nascent → Inception0.2% Remote · rank 58Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.1Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0
Broad fall in critical technology0.1 Inception— No route · rank 186Already at the foot of the scale×38—
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure2.3 Inception— No route · rank 186Already at the foot of the scale×2.4—
Broad fall in national security0.4 Inception— No route · rank 186Already at the foot of the scale×8.0—
Broad fall in information and influence2.1 Inception— No route · rank 187Already at the foot of the scale×2.1—
Broad fall in financial strength2.7 Inception— No route · rank 186Already at the foot of the scale×2.0—
Broad fall in production and innovation1.8 Inception— No route · rank 186Already at the foot of the scale×2.4—
Broad fall in trade and investment2.1 Inception— No route · rank 186Already at the foot of the scale×1.9—
Loss of advanced technology base0.0 Inception— No route · rank 186Already at the foot of the scale——
Collapse in energy security1.0 Inception— No route · rank 186Already at the foot of the scale×3.0—
Failure of digital lifelines1.9 Inception— No route · rank 186Already at the foot of the scale×2.7—
Defence readiness failure0.5 Inception— No route · rank 188Already at the foot of the scale×6.3—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.2 Inception— No route · rank 186Already at the foot of the scale×13—
Strategic awareness failure0.3 Inception— No route · rank 186Already at the foot of the scale×11—
Breakdown of information trust2.6 Inception— No route · rank 187Already at the foot of the scale×2.3—
Diplomatic isolation2.4 Inception— No route · rank 187Already at the foot of the scale×1.9—
Loss of financial stability2.7 Inception— No route · rank 187Already at the foot of the scale×1.9—
Loss of industrial capacity1.8 Inception— No route · rank 186Already at the foot of the scale×2.4—
Rupture in trade and supply2.7 Inception— No route · rank 186Already at the foot of the scale×1.4—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology0.1 Inception— No route · rank 186No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure2.3 Inception— No route · rank 186No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Broad rise in national security0.4 Inception— No route · rank 186No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×19—
Broad rise in human capital3.7 Nascent— No route · rank 186No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×13—
Broad rise in information and influence2.1 Inception— No route · rank 186No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×15—
Broad rise in governance and integrity4.8 Nascent— No route · rank 186No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.2—
Broad rise in financial strength2.7 Inception— No route · rank 186No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×13—
Broad rise in production and innovation1.8 Inception— No route · rank 186No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×15—
Broad rise in trade and investment2.1 Inception— No route · rank 186No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×9.8—
Assured space services0.3 Inception— No route · rank 186No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×20—
Frontier AI and compute0.0 Inception— No route · rank 186No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×15—
Higher-value manufacturing0.7 Inception— No route · rank 186No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×17—
Reliable low-cost energy1.3 Inception— No route · rank 186No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.4—
Secure food and water supply3.2 Nascent— No route · rank 186No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×9.8—
More deployable joint force0.6 Inception— No route · rank 186No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×20—
Adaptable skilled workforce2.8 Inception— No route · rank 186No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Stronger health and biotechnology3.2 Nascent— No route · rank 186No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.0—
Stronger information environment1.7 Inception— No route · rank 186No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—
Wider international influence2.4 Inception— No route · rank 186No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Capable digital government3.6 Nascent— No route · rank 186No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×7.5—
Trusted public institutions4.0 Nascent— No route · rank 186No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×7.5—
Deeper long-term finance2.5 Inception— No route · rank 186No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Research translated into value1.3 Inception— No route · rank 186No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×15—
Higher-value international business1.5 Inception— No route · rank 186No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×9.2—
Sophisticated export strength2.0 Inception— No route · rank 186No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×12—