Gulf and Middle East · KWT

Kuwait

Baseline index 7.50Rank 73 of 197FoundationalGulf and Middle EastAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on vulnerability; the upside mostly passes them by. One of 40 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Insulated over 10 years: lower vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
18.1
rank 117 of 197 · 3 years: 17.8
Worst case
−13.0%
Regional war spillover · tail −11.5%
Opportunity · 10 years
−10.1
rank 125 of 197 · 3 years: −10.3
Best case
+15
Chronic disease advance · gainer in 3 of 10
Shock absorbed
31%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.22
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
7of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Trade bloc rupture. Highest exposure indicators: oil, gas and coal among the top five exports of a net exporter; urban share of population; internet users as a share of population; little renewable water per head; industry as a share of gdp; adult obesity rate.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Kuwait’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 1.00−0.97−1.46−0.64▼ 427Maritime Power 3.3 · Nascent
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.89−0.88−1.11−0.49▼ 425Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.5 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.70−0.75−1.04−0.46▼ 121Artificial Intelligence 1.8 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.64−0.67−0.99−0.43▲ 120Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.7 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.67−0.64−0.87−0.38▼ 120Political Institutions & Civic Participation 4.5 · Nascent
Trade bloc rupture S01High 0.62−0.61−0.91−0.40▼ 318Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.52−0.50−0.81−0.35014Energy Infrastructure 6.2 · Foundational
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.62−0.49−0.69−0.30▼ 118Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.9 · Inception
Core disaster S07Medium 0.38−0.32−0.53−0.23▲ 312Energy Infrastructure 6.4 · Foundational
Global funding seizure S02Low 0.34−0.26−0.42−0.19▲ 29Economic Output & Productivity 5.9 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.55−1.30−1.20−0.50−0.50−1.25−1.17−1.00−1.29
Cryptographic trust break−1.10−0.63−1.15·−1.39−1.30−1.22−0.52−0.60
AI labour shock−0.82−0.38·−1.00−0.88−1.04−0.88−0.86−0.86
Severe pandemic−0.71−0.36−0.29−0.87−0.76−0.81−0.76−0.74−0.74
Legitimacy rupture−0.37−0.41−0.74−0.37−0.87−1.21−0.99−0.37−0.42
Trade bloc rupture−0.76−0.31−0.28−0.31−0.73−0.70−0.73−0.72−0.98
Breadbasket failure−0.27−0.63−0.22−0.59−0.56−0.60−0.64−0.48−0.55
Hybrid coercion−0.36−0.79−0.79·−0.88−0.91·−0.33−0.33
Core disaster−0.02−0.48−0.15−0.38−0.17−0.43−0.45−0.39−0.39
Global funding seizure−0.15−0.17·−0.17−0.15−0.35−0.57−0.40−0.35
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Kuwait is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Gainer+14.523.69.13043Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3 · Nascent
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+14.018.94.93075Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3 · Nascent
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Gainer+10.013.33.32937Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3 · Nascent
Great-power détente S13 ↗Mixed−4.310.114.42061Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.7 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−5.81.67.438170Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 6 · Foundational
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed−9.19.818.926122Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2.6 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Loser−11.624.135.739166Intelligence & Assessment 6.5 · Foundational
Market access opening S12 ↗Loser−14.419.734.138136Digital & Services Trade 6.8 · Foundational
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−18.78.327.11389Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.7 · Inception
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Loser−48.68.857.325178Energy Technologies 2 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Kuwait, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function9.3 Transitional → Foundational4.0% Possible · rank 37Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail×2.0Maritime Power 5.3
Broad fall in governance and integrity7.9 Foundational → Nascent1.9% Possible · rank 56Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.3Maritime Power 5.3
Loss of financial stability10.7 Transitional → Foundational1.7% Possible · rank 104Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.3Maritime Power 5.3
Strategic awareness failure4.7 Nascent → Inception1.6% Possible · rank 21Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×1.7Quantum Technologies 1
Rupture in trade and supply9.0 Foundational → Nascent1.4% Possible · rank 48Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail×1.7Maritime Power 5.3
Collapse in energy security7.0 Foundational → Nascent1.3% Possible · rank 16Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail×1.8Maritime Power 5.3
Breakdown of information trust6.4 Foundational → Nascent1.2% Possible · rank 27Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 1
Rule of law failure6.4 Foundational → Nascent1.1% Possible · rank 35Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 1
Defence readiness failure7.8 Foundational → Nascent1.1% Possible · rank 5Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.4Maritime Power 5.3
Broad fall in trade and investment7.9 Foundational → Nascent1.0% Possible · rank 28Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.3Maritime Power 5.3
Broad fall in information and influence7.8 Foundational → Nascent0.9% Unlikely · rank 32Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 1
Broad fall in financial strength10.7 Transitional → Foundational0.9% Unlikely · rank 123Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.5Maritime Power 5.3
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure9.5 Transitional → Foundational0.9% Unlikely · rank 12Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.3Maritime Power 5.3
Diplomatic isolation10.0 Transitional → Foundational0.8% Unlikely · rank 38Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 1
Broad fall in national security5.9 Nascent → Inception0.6% Unlikely · rank 17Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.5Maritime Power 5.3
Food and water failure10.1 Transitional → Foundational0.5% Unlikely · rank 68Regional war spillover Severe + Breadbasket failure Severeplans fail×3.0Agriculture & Food Infrastructure 8.3
Failure of digital lifelines8.7 Foundational → Nascent0.5% Unlikely · rank 40Regional war spillover Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail×2.2Maritime Power 5.3
Health system failure11.2 Transitional → Foundational0.4% Unlikely · rank 126Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×2.3Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3
Broad fall in production and innovation6.5 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Unlikely · rank 88Regional war spillover Extreme + Severe pandemic Majorplans fail×3.0Maritime Power 5.3
Loss of industrial capacity7.3 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Unlikely · rank 107Regional war spillover Extreme + Severe pandemic Majorplans fail×3.0Maritime Power 5.3
Broad fall in human capital9.4 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 123Regional war spillover Severe + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×3.0Artificial Intelligence 3.3
Education pipeline failure10.0 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 114Breadbasket failure Severe + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×3.2Artificial Intelligence 3.3
Loss of strategic deterrence3.0 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 34Regional war spillover Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×3.0Maritime Power 5.3
Broad fall in critical technology1.9 Inception— No route · rank 75Already at the foot of the scale×2.7—
Loss of advanced technology base1.1 Inception— No route · rank 75Already at the foot of the scale×3.2—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Stronger health and biotechnology8.4 Foundational → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 78Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3
Broad rise in governance and integrity7.9 Foundational → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 79Middle East settlement Extreme + Chronic disease advance Extreme×3.0Intelligence & Assessment 6.5
Broad rise in critical technology1.9 Inception— No route · rank 73No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.9—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure9.5 Transitional— No route · rank 76No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.2—
Broad rise in national security5.9 Nascent— No route · rank 73No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×3.8—
Broad rise in human capital9.4 Transitional— No route · rank 74No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.8—
Broad rise in information and influence7.8 Foundational— No route · rank 74No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.1—
Broad rise in financial strength10.7 Transitional— No route · rank 73No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×3.6—
Broad rise in production and innovation6.5 Foundational— No route · rank 73No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.1—
Broad rise in trade and investment7.9 Foundational— No route · rank 78No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.2—
Assured space services2.1 Inception— No route · rank 73No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×6.0—
Frontier AI and compute2.0 Inception— No route · rank 73No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.2—
Higher-value manufacturing4.1 Nascent— No route · rank 73No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.3—
Reliable low-cost energy4.6 Nascent— No route · rank 85No route found · closest 1.5 of 1.5×2.8—
Secure food and water supply10.1 Transitional— No route · rank 80No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.8—
More deployable joint force7.2 Foundational— No route · rank 73No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×4.2—
Adaptable skilled workforce7.7 Foundational— No route · rank 75No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.1—
Stronger information environment5.7 Nascent— No route · rank 73No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×4.0—
Wider international influence10.0 Transitional— No route · rank 74No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×2.5—
Capable digital government10.2 Transitional— No route · rank 90No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.2—
Trusted public institutions6.5 Foundational— No route · rank 88No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.3—
Deeper long-term finance11.3 Transitional— No route · rank 73No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.8—
Research translated into value6.6 Foundational— No route · rank 74No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.1—
Higher-value international business7.1 Foundational— No route · rank 80No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.0—
Sophisticated export strength6.7 Foundational— No route · rank 73No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.8—