South Asia · MDV

Maldives

Baseline index 4.62Rank 128 of 197NascentSouth AsiaAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Fragile and exposed. Highly vulnerable importers of fuel, finance and food. One of 35 nations with a similar pattern of results.

High stakes over 10 years: higher vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
35.1
rank 53 of 197 · 3 years: 34.8
Worst case
−23.4%
Regional war spillover · tail −20.2%
Opportunity · 10 years
−4.4
rank 88 of 197 · 3 years: −4.1
Best case
+6
Market access opening · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
21%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.33
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
6of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Global funding seizure. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; little renewable water per head; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; few months of imports covered by reserves; internet users as a share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Maldives’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.98−1.08−1.29−0.59▼ 527Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.85−0.92−1.16−0.52▼ 626Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02High 0.85−0.79−1.02−0.45▼ 321Economic Output & Productivity 2.5 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.69−0.76−0.98−0.44▲ 122Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06High 0.63−0.72−0.95−0.42▼ 223Energy Infrastructure 2.5 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.72−0.70−0.82−0.37▲ 215Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.68−0.62−0.83−0.37▲ 223Force Generation & Mobilisation 2.5 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.46−0.51−0.62−0.28▲ 418Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04Medium 0.50−0.45−0.53−0.24▼ 111Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Core disaster S07Medium 0.43−0.43−0.61−0.27▲ 418Energy Infrastructure 3 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.31−1.39−1.12−0.61−0.61−1.52−1.42−1.22−1.56
AI labour shock−0.46−0.50·−1.34−1.17−1.38−1.17−1.15−1.15
Global funding seizure−0.24−0.54·−0.55−0.49−1.11−1.80−1.26−1.12
Severe pandemic−0.38−0.43−0.35−1.05−0.92−0.98−0.92−0.90−0.90
Breadbasket failure−0.22−0.92−0.32−0.87−0.83−0.89−0.95−0.71−0.81
Cryptographic trust break−0.43−0.55−0.91·−1.23−1.15−1.07−0.46−0.53
Legitimacy rupture−0.20−0.41−0.70−0.38−0.88−1.22−1.00−0.38−0.43
Trade bloc rupture−0.31−0.28−0.25−0.28−0.66−0.64−0.66−0.65−0.89
Hybrid coercion−0.20−0.75−0.72·−0.84−0.86·−0.31−0.31
Core disaster−0.02−0.64−0.21−0.51−0.23−0.57−0.61−0.52−0.52
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Maldives is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed+6.418.712.32550Energy Infrastructure 3.9 · Nascent
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed+6.310.03.71765Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1 · Inception
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed+5.812.06.118105Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed+1.58.87.32978Energy Infrastructure 3.9 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed+0.911.310.423115Intelligence & Assessment 3 · Nascent
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Mixed−4.010.914.914144Resource Infrastructure 0.8 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−10.610.220.819130Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1 · Inception
Public service leap S18 ↗Loser−10.911.021.919139Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−16.94.821.611141Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−20.83.524.26100Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Maldives, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Loss of financial stability6.2 Foundational → Nascent4.7% Possible · rank 11Global funding seizure Extreme×1.5Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.6
Breakdown of state function8.3 Foundational → Nascent4.3% Possible · rank 28Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severe×1.6Resource Infrastructure 0.8
Rupture in trade and supply5.4 Nascent → Inception3.2% Possible · rank 12Regional war spillover Extreme×1.4Resource Infrastructure 0.8
Broad fall in financial strength5.7 Nascent → Inception2.8% Possible · rank 9Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Severe×1.7Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.6
Broad fall in governance and integrity7.4 Foundational → Nascent2.5% Possible · rank 20Regional war spillover Extreme + Legitimacy rupture Major×2.0Resource Infrastructure 0.8
Rule of law failure6.9 Foundational → Nascent1.4% Possible · rank 20Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.4Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4
Broad fall in trade and investment5.2 Nascent → Inception1.4% Possible · rank 17Global funding seizure Major + Regional war spillover Extreme×1.9Resource Infrastructure 0.8
Food and water failure6.9 Foundational → Nascent1.1% Possible · rank 31Breadbasket failure Extremeplans fail×2.1Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.6
Breakdown of information trust5.0 Nascent → Inception1.1% Possible · rank 46Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×2.2Artificial Intelligence 1.3
Health system failure9.2 Transitional → Foundational0.9% Unlikely · rank 51Breadbasket failure Major + Severe pandemic Extreme×1.9Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1
Broad fall in production and innovation4.7 Nascent → Inception0.9% Unlikely · rank 6Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.4Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.6
Loss of industrial capacity4.3 Nascent → Inception0.8% Unlikely · rank 13Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.2Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.6
Broad fall in human capital7.6 Foundational → Nascent0.4% Unlikely · rank 12Global funding seizure Major + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×2.2Artificial Intelligence 1.3
Broad fall in information and influence3.8 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 91Trade bloc rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.5Quantum Technologies 0.3
Education pipeline failure8.4 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Unlikely · rank 22Breadbasket failure Major + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×2.4Artificial Intelligence 1.3
Diplomatic isolation4.2 Nascent → Inception0.2% Remote · rank 104Trade bloc rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.5Quantum Technologies 0.3
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure4.9 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 128Regional war spillover Extreme + Breadbasket failure Severeplans fail×2.2Resource Infrastructure 0.8
Failure of digital lifelines5.1 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 91Regional war spillover Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×3.0Quantum Technologies 0.3
Broad fall in critical technology0.5 Inception— No route · rank 129Already at the foot of the scale×6.5—
Broad fall in national security1.8 Inception— No route · rank 133Already at the foot of the scale×2.7—
Loss of advanced technology base0.1 Inception— No route · rank 129Already at the foot of the scale×48—
Collapse in energy security1.8 Inception— No route · rank 140Already at the foot of the scale×2.3—
Defence readiness failure2.3 Inception— No route · rank 145Already at the foot of the scale×2.1—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.3 Inception— No route · rank 129Already at the foot of the scale×9.0—
Strategic awareness failure1.8 Inception— No route · rank 132Already at the foot of the scale×2.3—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology0.5 Inception— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.6—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure4.9 Nascent— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.5—
Broad rise in national security1.8 Inception— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×8.1—
Broad rise in human capital7.6 Foundational— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×4.8—
Broad rise in information and influence3.8 Nascent— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.6—
Broad rise in governance and integrity7.4 Foundational— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.3—
Broad rise in financial strength5.7 Nascent— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.9—
Broad rise in production and innovation4.7 Nascent— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.3—
Broad rise in trade and investment5.2 Nascent— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×3.4—
Assured space services0.5 Inception— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.5—
Frontier AI and compute0.7 Inception— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×8.3—
Higher-value manufacturing1.6 Inception— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.1—
Reliable low-cost energy2.3 Inception— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.3—
Secure food and water supply6.9 Foundational— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.0—
More deployable joint force2.4 Inception— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×8.8—
Adaptable skilled workforce6.3 Foundational— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.3—
Stronger health and biotechnology6.4 Foundational— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.0—
Stronger information environment3.5 Nascent— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.3—
Wider international influence4.2 Nascent— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.3—
Capable digital government8.0 Foundational— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.0—
Trusted public institutions6.4 Foundational— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.3—
Deeper long-term finance5.6 Nascent— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×7.3—
Research translated into value3.9 Nascent— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.3—
Higher-value international business5.7 Nascent— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×3.2—
Sophisticated export strength4.6 Nascent— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.0—