Africa · MLI

Mali

Baseline index 3.41Rank 163 of 197NascentAfricaAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Fragile and exposed. Highly vulnerable importers of fuel, finance and food. One of 35 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
33.9
rank 57 of 197 · 3 years: 33.7
Worst case
−24.7%
Regional war spillover · tail −21.9%
Opportunity · 10 years
−8.1
rank 108 of 197 · 3 years: −8.0
Best case
+7
Middle East settlement · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
14%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.25
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
9of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Maritime Power
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, Breadbasket failure, Global funding seizure. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; land borders with states in conflict or collapse; no coastline; share of population aged under 15; low life expectancy at birth; low real gdp per head.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Mali’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.71−0.84−0.97−0.44025Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.72−0.75−0.89−0.40019Information Environment & Strategic Communication 1.2 · Inception
Core disaster S07Medium 0.57−0.65−0.79−0.34025Energy Infrastructure 2.1 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10Medium 0.51−0.64−0.74−0.33▲ 118Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.3 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.45−0.58−0.70−0.31▲ 620Energy Infrastructure 2.4 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02Medium 0.53−0.54−0.65−0.29▲ 216Investment Attraction & Projection 1.7 · Inception
AI labour shock S08Medium 0.43−0.54−0.61−0.27▲ 217Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09Medium 0.45−0.49−0.53−0.24▲ 411Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Low 0.32−0.39−0.45−0.20▲ 613Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04Low 0.27−0.25−0.29−0.13▲ 311Maritime Power 0 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.31−1.19−0.87−0.46−0.46−1.14−1.07−0.92−1.18
Legitimacy rupture−0.30−0.50−0.80−0.46−1.06−1.48−1.22−0.46−0.52
Core disaster−0.04−0.98−0.28−0.78−0.35−0.88−0.94−0.80−0.80
Severe pandemic−0.45−0.36−0.26−0.86−0.76−0.81−0.76−0.74−0.74
Breadbasket failure−0.24−0.74−0.23−0.69−0.66−0.71−0.76−0.57−0.65
Global funding seizure−0.24−0.36·−0.37−0.33−0.74−1.21−0.85−0.75
AI labour shock−0.36−0.28·−0.76−0.66−0.78−0.66−0.65−0.65
Cryptographic trust break−0.38−0.37−0.62·−0.83−0.78−0.73−0.31−0.36
Trade bloc rupture−0.35−0.21−0.17−0.21−0.48−0.47−0.48−0.47−0.65
Hybrid coercion−0.16−0.43−0.36·−0.47−0.49·−0.18−0.18
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Mali is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed+6.912.96.12080Energy Infrastructure 3.5 · Nascent
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Mixed+6.78.51.810100Energy Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed+4.48.44.01476Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.6 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed+2.410.37.92066Energy Infrastructure 3.5 · Nascent
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Mixed−2.84.47.21495Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.6 · Inception
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed−8.76.515.214179Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.6 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−10.82.112.89100Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Public service leap S18 ↗Loser−17.310.728.011174Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Loser−19.111.831.017158Investment Attraction & Projection 3 · Nascent
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−31.01.632.65159Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Mali, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Loss of financial stability4.8 Nascent → Inception1.5% Possible · rank 115Global funding seizure Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.2Information Environment & Strategic Communication 3
Breakdown of state function4.3 Nascent → Inception1.2% Possible · rank 166Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Extreme×1.9Information Environment & Strategic Communication 3
Broad fall in governance and integrity4.3 Nascent → Inception0.9% Unlikely · rank 140Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Extreme×2.0Information Environment & Strategic Communication 3
Broad fall in financial strength4.5 Nascent → Inception0.7% Unlikely · rank 143Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×2.5Information Environment & Strategic Communication 3
Health system failure4.2 Nascent → Inception0.4% Unlikely · rank 130Breadbasket failure Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.3Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.6
Rupture in trade and supply4.0 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 145Regional war spillover Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail×1.9Maritime Power 0
Rule of law failure4.6 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 158Legitimacy rupture Extreme + AI labour shock Majorplans fail×2.0Information Environment & Strategic Communication 3
Breakdown of information trust4.0 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 135Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×2.0Information Environment & Strategic Communication 3
Food and water failure4.9 Nascent → Inception0.2% Unlikely · rank 119Regional war spillover Severe + Breadbasket failure Extremeplans fail×2.6Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.2
Loss of industrial capacity3.7 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 159Regional war spillover Extreme + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.3Maritime Power 0
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure4.1 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 149Regional war spillover Extreme + Breadbasket failure Extremeplans fail×2.5Maritime Power 0
Broad fall in production and innovation3.3 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 164Global funding seizure Extreme + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×3.3Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.2
Broad fall in trade and investment3.6 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 171Trade bloc rupture Extreme + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.5Maritime Power 0
Broad fall in critical technology0.5 Inception— No route · rank 163Already at the foot of the scale×6.7—
Broad fall in national security2.5 Inception— No route · rank 164Already at the foot of the scale×3.4—
Broad fall in human capital3.9 Nascent → Inception— Remote · rank 185Core disaster Extreme + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.6
Broad fall in information and influence4.2 Nascent— No route · rank 171No route found · closest 2.9 of 3×2.8—
Loss of advanced technology base0.2 Inception— No route · rank 163Already at the foot of the scale×13—
Collapse in energy security2.8 Inception— No route · rank 164Already at the foot of the scale×2.1—
Failure of digital lifelines3.4 Nascent— No route · rank 164No route found · closest 2.2 of 3×3.9—
Defence readiness failure3.6 Nascent— No route · rank 168No route found · closest 2.8 of 3×3.3—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.8 Inception— No route · rank 163Already at the foot of the scale×3.9—
Strategic awareness failure2.0 Inception— No route · rank 164Already at the foot of the scale×3.3—
Education pipeline failure4.4 Nascent— No route · rank 190No route found · closest 2.9 of 3×3.7—
Diplomatic isolation3.8 Nascent— No route · rank 177No route found · closest 2.9 of 3×3.3—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology0.5 Inception— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.5—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure4.1 Nascent— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.0—
Broad rise in national security2.5 Inception— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×7.0—
Broad rise in human capital3.9 Nascent— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.6—
Broad rise in information and influence4.2 Nascent— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.8—
Broad rise in governance and integrity4.3 Nascent— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.6—
Broad rise in financial strength4.5 Nascent— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.3—
Broad rise in production and innovation3.3 Nascent— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×8.5—
Broad rise in trade and investment3.6 Nascent— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.4—
Assured space services0.6 Inception— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×12—
Frontier AI and compute0.3 Inception— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.3—
Higher-value manufacturing1.9 Inception— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Reliable low-cost energy2.0 Inception— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.2—
Secure food and water supply4.9 Nascent— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.0—
More deployable joint force2.9 Inception— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×7.8—
Adaptable skilled workforce3.4 Nascent— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.8—
Stronger health and biotechnology3.3 Nascent— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.9—
Stronger information environment4.5 Nascent— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.8—
Wider international influence3.8 Nascent— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×4.7—
Capable digital government4.1 Nascent— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.7—
Trusted public institutions4.3 Nascent— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.7—
Deeper long-term finance4.2 Nascent— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.5—
Research translated into value2.6 Inception— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×8.5—
Higher-value international business3.0 Nascent— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.1—
Sophisticated export strength3.9 Nascent— No route · rank 163No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.4—