Africa · MUS

Mauritius

Baseline index 8.08Rank 67 of 197FoundationalAfricaAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Low vulnerability, and gains from open markets and digital public services. One of 39 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
14.0
rank 138 of 197 · 3 years: 13.8
Worst case
−10.4%
Regional war spillover · tail −9.0%
Opportunity · 10 years
+5.7
rank 54 of 197 · 3 years: +5.9
Best case
+19
Clean power threshold · gainer in 4 of 10
Shock absorbed
35%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.17
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Semiconductors & Advanced Computing
weakest point in 1 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Trade bloc rupture. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; internet users as a share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Mauritius’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.79−0.84−1.14−0.50▼ 217Strategic Strike & Missile Defence 0 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.69−0.69−1.07−0.47▼ 119Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.5 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.68−0.65−0.86−0.38018Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.9 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.68−0.63−1.00−0.44▲ 119Artificial Intelligence 2.7 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.73−0.56−0.93−0.41▲ 115Force Generation & Mobilisation 2 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.46−0.46−0.68−0.30▲ 111Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02High 0.62−0.45−0.78−0.3408Economic Output & Productivity 6.9 · Foundational
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.44−0.41−0.69−0.30▲ 19Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 6 · Nascent
Core disaster S07Medium 0.53−0.41−0.74−0.3209Energy Infrastructure 6.4 · Foundational
Hybrid coercion S04Medium 0.36−0.30−0.40−0.17▲ 18Maritime Power 2.4 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.48−1.14−0.94−0.44−0.44−1.10−1.02−0.88−1.13
Severe pandemic−0.74−0.37−0.30−0.89−0.78−0.84−0.78−0.77−0.77
Cryptographic trust break−0.83−0.46−0.83·−1.02−0.96−0.89−0.38−0.44
AI labour shock−0.70−0.32·−0.85−0.74−0.87−0.74−0.72−0.72
Legitimacy rupture−0.32−0.36−0.65−0.32−0.76−1.06−0.87−0.32−0.37
Trade bloc rupture−0.58−0.23−0.21−0.23−0.54−0.52−0.54−0.53−0.73
Global funding seizure−0.27−0.29·−0.30−0.27−0.60−0.98−0.69−0.61
Breadbasket failure−0.21−0.51−0.17−0.47−0.45−0.49−0.52−0.39−0.44
Core disaster−0.02−0.62−0.20−0.49−0.22−0.55−0.59−0.51−0.51
Hybrid coercion−0.22−0.48−0.48·−0.54−0.56·−0.20−0.20
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Mauritius is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Gainer+18.619.71.12549Energy Technologies 1.6 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Gainer+15.217.62.43425Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8 · Nascent
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+13.522.59.03476Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Gainer+10.514.23.73463Intelligence & Assessment 4.7 · Nascent
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed+7.724.917.34442Energy Infrastructure 7.3 · Foundational
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed+4.619.615.03556Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3.4 · Nascent
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed+2.77.64.94763Energy Infrastructure 7.3 · Foundational
Great-power détente S13 ↗Mixed−0.19.39.42248Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.7 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Mixed−5.116.321.436106Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8 · Nascent
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Mixed−8.57.415.91562Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.7 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Mauritius, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Loss of financial stability11.7 Transitional → Foundational1.4% Possible · rank 120Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.7Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6
Breakdown of state function12.2 Established → Transitional1.4% Possible · rank 161Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Resource Infrastructure 2.5
Rupture in trade and supply9.9 Transitional → Foundational1.0% Possible · rank 88Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.0Resource Infrastructure 2.5
Broad fall in financial strength11.4 Transitional → Foundational0.9% Unlikely · rank 120Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.9Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 9.6
Broad fall in governance and integrity11.6 Transitional → Foundational0.9% Unlikely · rank 134Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.7Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6
Rule of law failure11.5 Transitional → Foundational0.6% Unlikely · rank 117Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.8Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6
Breakdown of information trust7.6 Foundational → Nascent0.5% Unlikely · rank 110Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×2.8Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6
Health system failure11.5 Transitional → Foundational0.4% Unlikely · rank 134Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×2.2Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8
Loss of industrial capacity8.7 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 88Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.4Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8
Broad fall in trade and investment10.3 Transitional → Foundational0.3% Unlikely · rank 122Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.7Resource Infrastructure 2.5
Broad fall in production and innovation9.4 Transitional → Foundational0.3% Unlikely · rank 85Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.4Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8
Strategic awareness failure3.5 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 73Regional war spillover Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.4Quantum Technologies 1
Food and water failure10.6 Transitional → Foundational0.1% Remote · rank 153Regional war spillover Severe + Breadbasket failure Extremeplans fail×3.4Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 9.6
Diplomatic isolation5.3 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 123Trade bloc rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.9Quantum Technologies 1
Broad fall in information and influence6.2 Foundational → Nascent0.1% Remote · rank 124Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×2.9Artificial Intelligence 4
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure8.5 Foundational → Nascent0.1% Remote · rank 132Regional war spillover Extreme + Breadbasket failure Severeplans fail×2.6Resource Infrastructure 2.5
Failure of digital lifelines9.0 Transitional → Foundational0.1% Remote · rank 78Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.9Quantum Technologies 1
Broad fall in human capital10.8 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 110Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.4Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8
Collapse in energy security3.8 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 115Regional war spillover Extreme + Breadbasket failure Severeplans fail×2.0Resource Infrastructure 2.5
Education pipeline failure11.7 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 163Regional war spillover Extreme + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8
Broad fall in critical technology2.0 Inception— No route · rank 69Already at the foot of the scale×3.6—
Broad fall in national security2.5 Inception— No route · rank 91Already at the foot of the scale×3.2—
Loss of advanced technology base1.1 Inception— No route · rank 69Already at the foot of the scale×4.0—
Defence readiness failure2.6 Inception— No route · rank 123Already at the foot of the scale×2.7—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.8 Inception— No route · rank 71Already at the foot of the scale×5.8—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Capable digital government11.6 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 74Market access opening Extreme + Public service leap Extreme×2.5Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3.4
Broad rise in governance and integrity11.6 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 74Market access opening Extreme + Public service leap Extreme×3.1Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3.4
Reliable low-cost energy4.4 Nascent → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 62Market access opening Extreme + Clean power threshold Extreme×2.5Energy Technologies 1.6
Stronger health and biotechnology8.9 Foundational → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 74Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8
Trusted public institutions11.1 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 75Market access opening Extreme + Public service leap Extreme×2.5Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3.4
Broad rise in trade and investment10.3 Transitional → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 66Market access opening Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.6Energy Infrastructure 7.3
Higher-value international business10.9 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 70Market access opening Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.4Energy Infrastructure 7.3
Broad rise in critical technology2.0 Inception— No route · rank 67No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.0—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure8.5 Foundational— No route · rank 72No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.4—
Broad rise in national security2.5 Inception— No route · rank 67No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.4—
Broad rise in human capital10.8 Transitional— No route · rank 68No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.6—
Broad rise in information and influence6.2 Foundational— No route · rank 68No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.8—
Broad rise in financial strength11.4 Transitional— No route · rank 67No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.3—
Broad rise in production and innovation9.4 Transitional— No route · rank 67No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×4.0—
Assured space services1.6 Inception— No route · rank 67No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.1—
Frontier AI and compute2.3 Inception— No route · rank 67No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.4—
Higher-value manufacturing5.1 Nascent— No route · rank 67No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.4—
Secure food and water supply10.6 Transitional— No route · rank 76No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×2.8—
More deployable joint force2.7 Inception— No route · rank 67No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.0—
Adaptable skilled workforce10.4 Transitional— No route · rank 70No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.2—
Stronger information environment7.1 Foundational— No route · rank 67No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.3—
Wider international influence5.3 Nascent— No route · rank 69No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.2—
Deeper long-term finance11.3 Transitional— No route · rank 68No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×4.1—
Research translated into value8.3 Foundational— No route · rank 69No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×4.0—
Sophisticated export strength10.1 Transitional— No route · rank 68No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.0—