Russia and Eurasia · MDA

Moldova

Baseline index 6.34Rank 93 of 197FoundationalRussia and EurasiaAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on vulnerability; the upside mostly passes them by. One of 40 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
22.0
rank 94 of 197 · 3 years: 21.6
Worst case
−16.3%
Regional war spillover · tail −13.7%
Opportunity · 10 years
−10.6
rank 133 of 197 · 3 years: −10.3
Best case
+0
Clean power threshold · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
26%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.27
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Investment Attraction & Projection
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Hybrid coercion. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; no coastline; refugees hosted per head of population; remittances relative to gdp; internet users as a share of population; low life expectancy at birth.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Moldova’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.92−1.03−1.29−0.57▼ 426Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.84−0.81−1.03−0.46020Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.69−0.76−1.06−0.46▲ 123Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.5 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.67−0.73−0.99−0.44▲ 123Artificial Intelligence 1.5 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.51−0.57−0.74−0.33▲ 116Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.68−0.55−0.72−0.32017Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.66−0.55−0.83−0.37018Investment Attraction & Projection 4.7 · Nascent
Global funding seizure S02Medium 0.43−0.38−0.53−0.23▲ 214Investment Attraction & Projection 4.4 · Nascent
Breadbasket failure S06Low 0.33−0.38−0.52−0.23▲ 114Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 5 · Nascent
Core disaster S07Low 0.29−0.27−0.41−0.18▲ 311Energy Infrastructure 5.4 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.60−1.42−1.03−0.55−0.55−1.37−1.28−1.09−1.41
Cryptographic trust break−1.03−0.59−0.95·−1.30−1.22−1.14−0.49−0.56
Severe pandemic−0.80−0.41−0.29−0.98−0.86−0.92−0.86−0.84−0.84
AI labour shock−0.80−0.37·−0.98−0.86−1.01−0.86−0.84−0.84
Trade bloc rupture−0.72−0.29−0.23−0.29−0.68−0.65−0.68−0.66−0.91
Hybrid coercion−0.42−0.92−0.76·−1.02−1.05·−0.38−0.38
Legitimacy rupture−0.32−0.35−0.58−0.32−0.75−1.05−0.86−0.32−0.37
Global funding seizure−0.23−0.25·−0.26−0.23−0.52−0.84−0.59−0.53
Breadbasket failure−0.20−0.47−0.15−0.44−0.42−0.45−0.48−0.36−0.42
Core disaster−0.01−0.41−0.12−0.33−0.15−0.37−0.39−0.34−0.34
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Moldova is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Mixed+0.113.713.721130Energy Technologies 1.6 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−1.15.76.837115Energy Infrastructure 6 · Foundational
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed−1.515.617.133130Intelligence & Assessment 5.7 · Nascent
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed−4.715.520.227156Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3 · Nascent
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed−4.98.913.83388Investment Attraction & Projection 5.3 · Nascent
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed−9.112.321.429123Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3.2 · Nascent
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−16.118.634.728159Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3 · Nascent
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Loser−17.37.925.326181Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3 · Nascent
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−18.16.424.61388Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.8 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−20.14.524.618162Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.8 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Moldova, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function9.7 Transitional → Foundational3.8% Possible · rank 50Regional war spillover Major + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×1.8Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 4.7
Rupture in trade and supply7.0 Foundational → Nascent3.0% Possible · rank 18Regional war spillover Extreme×1.6Maritime Power 0
Broad fall in governance and integrity9.4 Transitional → Foundational1.7% Possible · rank 66Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×2.2Maritime Power 0
Breakdown of information trust7.4 Foundational → Nascent1.5% Possible · rank 14Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Quantum Technologies 1
Strategic awareness failure3.8 Nascent → Inception1.3% Possible · rank 36Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×1.8Quantum Technologies 1
Rule of law failure9.5 Transitional → Foundational1.3% Possible · rank 26Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Quantum Technologies 1
Broad fall in financial strength7.0 Foundational → Nascent1.2% Possible · rank 84Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.4Maritime Power 0
Loss of financial stability7.6 Foundational → Nascent1.2% Possible · rank 139Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.2Maritime Power 0
Collapse in energy security3.6 Nascent → Inception1.1% Possible · rank 32Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×1.6Maritime Power 0
Broad fall in information and influence6.2 Foundational → Nascent0.9% Unlikely · rank 33Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Quantum Technologies 1
Diplomatic isolation4.9 Nascent → Inception0.8% Unlikely · rank 35Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Quantum Technologies 1
Broad fall in trade and investment6.9 Foundational → Nascent0.5% Unlikely · rank 79Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail×2.1Maritime Power 0
Failure of digital lifelines6.7 Foundational → Nascent0.4% Unlikely · rank 42Hybrid coercion Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail×2.3Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 4.7
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure6.6 Foundational → Nascent0.4% Unlikely · rank 55Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Severe×2.1Maritime Power 0
Broad fall in production and innovation7.0 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 86Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.7Maritime Power 0
Health system failure9.3 Transitional → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 171Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3
Loss of industrial capacity7.1 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 101Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.7Maritime Power 0
Food and water failure7.8 Foundational → Nascent0.1% Remote · rank 154Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×2.7Maritime Power 0
Broad fall in human capital9.1 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 157AI labour shock Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3
Education pipeline failure10.0 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 137Regional war spillover Extreme + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.3Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3
Broad fall in critical technology1.9 Inception— No route · rank 94Already at the foot of the scale×2.9—
Broad fall in national security3.0 Nascent— No route · rank 102No route found · closest 2.7 of 3×2.9—
Loss of advanced technology base1.2 Inception— No route · rank 94Already at the foot of the scale×3.5—
Defence readiness failure3.3 Nascent— No route · rank 128No route found · closest 2.7 of 3×3.7—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.9 Inception— No route · rank 94Already at the foot of the scale×3.4—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology1.9 Inception— No route · rank 93No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.9—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure6.6 Foundational— No route · rank 93No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.9—
Broad rise in national security3.0 Nascent— No route · rank 93No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×5.8—
Broad rise in human capital9.1 Transitional— No route · rank 93No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.8—
Broad rise in information and influence6.2 Foundational— No route · rank 93No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.8—
Broad rise in governance and integrity9.4 Transitional— No route · rank 95No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.3—
Broad rise in financial strength7.0 Foundational— No route · rank 93No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.6—
Broad rise in production and innovation7.0 Foundational— No route · rank 93No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.7—
Broad rise in trade and investment6.9 Foundational— No route · rank 93No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.7—
Assured space services1.2 Inception— No route · rank 93No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.4—
Frontier AI and compute1.9 Inception— No route · rank 93No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.4—
Higher-value manufacturing4.3 Nascent— No route · rank 93No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.5—
Reliable low-cost energy3.8 Nascent— No route · rank 96No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.6—
Secure food and water supply7.8 Foundational— No route · rank 94No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×6.3—
More deployable joint force3.1 Nascent— No route · rank 93No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.4—
Adaptable skilled workforce8.3 Foundational— No route · rank 93No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×6.1—
Stronger health and biotechnology7.2 Foundational— No route · rank 95No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.2—
Stronger information environment7.4 Foundational— No route · rank 93No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.8—
Wider international influence4.9 Nascent— No route · rank 93No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×3.9—
Capable digital government9.5 Transitional— No route · rank 101No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×4.0—
Trusted public institutions9.2 Transitional— No route · rank 99No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.1—
Deeper long-term finance6.6 Foundational— No route · rank 93No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.8—
Research translated into value6.6 Foundational— No route · rank 93No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×6.3—
Higher-value international business6.6 Foundational— No route · rank 94No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.5—
Sophisticated export strength7.4 Foundational— No route · rank 93No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.5—