Europe · MNE

Montenegro

Baseline index 6.35Rank 92 of 197FoundationalEuropeAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on vulnerability; the upside mostly passes them by. One of 40 nations with a similar pattern of results.

High stakes over 10 years: higher vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
25.5
rank 86 of 197 · 3 years: 25.2
Worst case
−16.2%
Regional war spillover · tail −14.7%
Opportunity · 10 years
−4.3
rank 86 of 197 · 3 years: −4.1
Best case
+17
Outbreak defence succeeds · gainer in 3 of 10
Shock absorbed
27%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.30
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Semiconductors & Advanced Computing
weakest point in 1 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Hybrid coercion. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; internet users as a share of population; refugees hosted per head of population; remittances relative to gdp; youth unemployment rate; share of population aged 65 and over; trade in goods and services relative to gdp.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Montenegro’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.95−1.03−1.36−0.61▼ 422Strategic Strike & Missile Defence 0 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.82−0.90−1.24−0.55▼ 315Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.82−0.86−1.19−0.53▼ 212Artificial Intelligence 0.6 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.87−0.85−1.07−0.48▼ 216Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.3 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02High 0.78−0.70−0.97−0.43▼ 312Investment Attraction & Projection 4 · Nascent
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.55−0.62−0.79−0.35▼ 17Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.73−0.60−0.81−0.36▼ 312Maritime Power 1.1 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05Medium 0.58−0.49−0.75−0.33▲ 110Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4.5 · Nascent
Core disaster S07Medium 0.49−0.45−0.69−0.3009Industrial & Sectoral Base 5.5 · Nascent
Breadbasket failure S06Low 0.34−0.38−0.53−0.23▲ 19Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 4.8 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.56−1.38−1.22−0.53−0.53−1.33−1.24−1.06−1.37
Severe pandemic−0.84−0.49−0.40−1.18−1.03−1.11−1.03−1.01−1.01
AI labour shock−0.84−0.44·−1.18−1.03−1.22−1.03−1.01−1.01
Cryptographic trust break−0.96−0.62−1.13·−1.38−1.29−1.21−0.52−0.59
Global funding seizure−0.41−0.46·−0.47−0.42−0.95−1.55−1.08−0.96
Trade bloc rupture−0.71−0.32−0.29−0.32−0.74−0.72−0.74−0.73−1.00
Hybrid coercion−0.44−0.98−0.98·−1.09−1.12·−0.41−0.41
Legitimacy rupture−0.29−0.32−0.57−0.29−0.67−0.93−0.76−0.29−0.33
Core disaster−0.02−0.67−0.22−0.53−0.24−0.60−0.64−0.55−0.55
Breadbasket failure−0.20−0.48−0.16−0.45−0.43−0.46−0.49−0.37−0.42
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Montenegro is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+16.919.72.82566Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Gainer+16.518.21.73447Intelligence & Assessment 5.2 · Nascent
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Gainer+16.517.00.52155Energy Technologies 1.4 · Inception
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed+1.79.57.82766Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2.4 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed−1.817.619.43475Investment Attraction & Projection 5.7 · Nascent
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−6.96.413.240180Energy Infrastructure 6.6 · Foundational
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−11.28.219.417103Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.5 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Loser−11.84.316.124153Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−12.29.922.21269Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.5 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−19.419.338.726170Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Montenegro, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function10.1 Transitional → Foundational6.0% Likely · rank 12Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severe×1.9Maritime Power 2.8
Loss of financial stability7.7 Foundational → Nascent3.7% Possible · rank 20Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Severe×1.8Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4.2
Broad fall in governance and integrity9.8 Transitional → Foundational2.8% Possible · rank 15Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Quantum Technologies 0.5
Broad fall in financial strength7.2 Foundational → Nascent2.2% Possible · rank 18Global funding seizure Severe + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail×1.9Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4.2
Breakdown of information trust6.9 Foundational → Nascent1.8% Possible · rank 6Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 0.5
Collapse in energy security3.9 Nascent → Inception1.8% Possible · rank 10Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail×1.7Maritime Power 2.8
Rupture in trade and supply7.0 Foundational → Nascent1.4% Possible · rank 43Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×1.6Maritime Power 2.8
Strategic awareness failure3.5 Nascent → Inception1.4% Possible · rank 30Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×1.8Quantum Technologies 0.5
Rule of law failure9.7 Transitional → Foundational1.3% Possible · rank 23Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 0.5
Broad fall in information and influence5.9 Nascent → Inception1.3% Possible · rank 9Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 0.5
Diplomatic isolation6.0 Foundational → Inception1.1% Possible · rank 13Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 0.5
Broad fall in trade and investment6.8 Foundational → Nascent1.1% Possible · rank 23Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.2Maritime Power 2.8
Loss of industrial capacity6.6 Foundational → Nascent1.1% Possible · rank 9Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.6Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4.2
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure6.7 Foundational → Nascent0.8% Unlikely · rank 16Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×2.2Maritime Power 2.8
Broad fall in production and innovation6.9 Foundational → Nascent0.8% Unlikely · rank 7Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.8Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2
Health system failure10.2 Transitional → Foundational0.8% Unlikely · rank 66Global funding seizure Major + Severe pandemic Extreme×1.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2
Failure of digital lifelines6.5 Foundational → Nascent0.5% Unlikely · rank 37Hybrid coercion Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail×2.2Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 4.3
Broad fall in human capital9.3 Transitional → Foundational0.5% Unlikely · rank 6Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2
Food and water failure7.7 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 106Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×2.8Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 4.3
Education pipeline failure10.2 Transitional → Foundational0.2% Remote · rank 34Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2
Defence readiness failure3.9 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 86Hybrid coercion Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.3Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 4.3
Broad fall in critical technology1.4 Inception— No route · rank 93Already at the foot of the scale×3.1—
Broad fall in national security3.2 Nascent— No route · rank 101No route found · closest 3.0 of 3×2.5—
Loss of advanced technology base0.8 Inception— No route · rank 93Already at the foot of the scale×4.6—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.9 Inception— No route · rank 93Already at the foot of the scale×3.4—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Stronger health and biotechnology7.4 Foundational → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 84Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×3.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2
Broad rise in critical technology1.4 Inception— No route · rank 92No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.6—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure6.7 Foundational— No route · rank 92No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.2—
Broad rise in national security3.2 Nascent— No route · rank 92No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.0—
Broad rise in human capital9.3 Transitional— No route · rank 92No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.6—
Broad rise in information and influence5.9 Nascent— No route · rank 92No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.1—
Broad rise in governance and integrity9.8 Transitional— No route · rank 94No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.7—
Broad rise in financial strength7.2 Foundational— No route · rank 92No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.4—
Broad rise in production and innovation6.9 Foundational— No route · rank 92No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.6—
Broad rise in trade and investment6.8 Foundational— No route · rank 92No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.6—
Assured space services1.1 Inception— No route · rank 92No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.8—
Frontier AI and compute1.4 Inception— No route · rank 92No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.0—
Higher-value manufacturing3.7 Nascent— No route · rank 92No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.1—
Reliable low-cost energy4.0 Nascent— No route · rank 95No route found · closest 1.5 of 1.5×2.9—
Secure food and water supply7.7 Foundational— No route · rank 93No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.1—
More deployable joint force3.8 Nascent— No route · rank 92No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.5—
Adaptable skilled workforce8.4 Foundational— No route · rank 92No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.5—
Stronger information environment5.9 Nascent— No route · rank 92No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.8—
Wider international influence6.0 Foundational— No route · rank 92No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.3—
Capable digital government9.2 Transitional— No route · rank 100No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.8—
Trusted public institutions9.4 Transitional— No route · rank 98No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×4.1—
Deeper long-term finance7.1 Foundational— No route · rank 92No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.7—
Research translated into value6.4 Foundational— No route · rank 92No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.0—
Higher-value international business7.1 Foundational— No route · rank 93No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.4—
Sophisticated export strength6.8 Foundational— No route · rank 92No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.3—