Africa · MAR

Morocco

Baseline index 9.36Rank 54 of 197TransitionalAfricaAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Low vulnerability, and gains from open markets and digital public services. One of 39 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
12.4
rank 151 of 197 · 3 years: 12.2
Worst case
−7.4%
Severe pandemic · tail −7.2%
Opportunity · 10 years
+12.8
rank 34 of 197 · 3 years: +13.1
Best case
+32
Clean power threshold · gainer in 6 of 10
Shock absorbed
37%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.15
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Global funding seizure. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; internet users as a share of population; little renewable water per head; remittances relative to gdp; adult obesity rate; youth unemployment rate; earthquake, storm, flood, drought and volcanic hazards named for the nation.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Morocco’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Severe pandemic S10High 0.72−0.69−1.11−0.49015Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5.1 · Nascent
Regional war spillover S03High 0.76−0.68−1.11−0.49▼ 113Strategic Strike & Missile Defence 5.6 · Nascent
Core disaster S07High 0.81−0.67−1.12−0.49015Health System Capability 8.6 · Foundational
AI labour shock S08High 0.67−0.66−1.00−0.44014Artificial Intelligence 3.7 · Nascent
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.75−0.65−0.97−0.4207Political Institutions & Civic Participation 6.5 · Foundational
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.69−0.65−0.88−0.39▲ 110Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3.1 · Nascent
Global funding seizure S02High 0.69−0.52−0.86−0.3709Labour & Employment 7.3 · Foundational
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.52−0.47−0.82−0.36▼ 19Population Health 7.8 · Foundational
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.42−0.38−0.63−0.28▲ 37Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.7 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04Medium 0.41−0.29−0.46−0.20▲ 45Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 4.2 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Severe pandemic−0.74−0.37−0.30−0.89−0.78−0.84−0.78−0.77−0.77
Regional war spillover−0.38−0.91−0.84−0.35−0.35−0.87−0.81−0.70−0.90
Core disaster−0.04−1.00−0.32−0.80−0.36−0.90−0.96−0.82−0.82
AI labour shock−0.73−0.33·−0.89−0.78−0.92−0.78−0.76−0.76
Legitimacy rupture−0.38−0.41−0.75−0.38−0.88−1.23−1.01−0.38−0.43
Cryptographic trust break−0.85−0.46−0.85·−1.03−0.96−0.90−0.39−0.44
Global funding seizure−0.31−0.34·−0.34−0.31−0.70−1.14−0.80−0.71
Breadbasket failure−0.25−0.58−0.20−0.55−0.52−0.56−0.60−0.45−0.51
Trade bloc rupture−0.50−0.19−0.17−0.19−0.45−0.44−0.45−0.44−0.61
Hybrid coercion−0.21−0.46−0.46·−0.52−0.53·−0.19−0.19
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Morocco is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Gainer+31.832.91.14029Energy Technologies 6 · Foundational
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Gainer+24.326.52.24211Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.4 · Foundational
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+19.228.18.94162Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.4 · Foundational
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Gainer+16.520.23.64746Justice System & Fundamental Rights 8.3 · Foundational
Debt service reset S11 ↗Gainer+12.817.44.7445Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 7.5 · Foundational
Market access opening S12 ↗Gainer+12.733.220.55030Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 9 · Transitional
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed+6.126.120.03451Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 4.6 · Nascent
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Mixed+4.825.520.74154Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.4 · Foundational
Great-power détente S13 ↗Mixed+3.010.77.63241Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.5 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Mixed−7.812.019.82360Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.5 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Morocco, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Loss of financial stability11.1 Transitional → Foundational2.9% Possible · rank 36Global funding seizure Severe + Legitimacy rupture Majorplans fail×2.4Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 8.6
Breakdown of state function10.1 Transitional → Foundational1.7% Possible · rank 149Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Maritime Power 8.3
Broad fall in financial strength10.6 Transitional → Foundational1.3% Possible · rank 74Global funding seizure Extremeplans fail×2.6Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 8.6
Broad fall in governance and integrity9.2 Transitional → Nascent1.2% Possible · rank 108Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×2.5Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 7.5
Rupture in trade and supply11.6 Transitional → Foundational0.9% Unlikely · rank 95Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.5Maritime Power 8.3
Collapse in energy security8.9 Foundational → Nascent0.8% Unlikely · rank 48Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.6Maritime Power 8.3
Breakdown of information trust9.6 Transitional → Foundational0.6% Unlikely · rank 85Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×2.4Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 7.5
Health system failure9.3 Transitional → Foundational0.5% Unlikely · rank 101Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×2.2Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.4
Rule of law failure8.0 Foundational → Nascent0.5% Unlikely · rank 126Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.4Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 7.5
Food and water failure12.1 Established → Foundational0.5% Unlikely · rank 66Breadbasket failure Severe + Core disaster Severeplans fail×2.8Health System Capability 10
Broad fall in trade and investment11.4 Transitional → Foundational0.4% Unlikely · rank 90Regional war spillover Extreme + Severe pandemic Majorplans fail×3.4Maritime Power 8.3
Loss of industrial capacity10.5 Transitional → Foundational0.4% Unlikely · rank 57Global funding seizure Major + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×3.4Health System Capability 10
Broad fall in production and innovation9.5 Transitional → Foundational0.4% Unlikely · rank 48Global funding seizure Major + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×3.7Health System Capability 10
Defence readiness failure10.8 Transitional → Foundational0.4% Unlikely · rank 39Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×3.2Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 7.5
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure11.1 Transitional → Foundational0.3% Unlikely · rank 71Global funding seizure Major + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×3.0Health System Capability 10
Broad fall in information and influence10.8 Transitional → Foundational0.3% Unlikely · rank 98Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×2.9Artificial Intelligence 5
Strategic awareness failure7.4 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Unlikely · rank 75Trade bloc rupture Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.3Quantum Technologies 1.8
Broad fall in national security8.3 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Remote · rank 56Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×3.5Quantum Technologies 1.8
Broad fall in human capital9.1 Transitional → Nascent0.2% Remote · rank 60Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.4Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.4
Diplomatic isolation10.4 Transitional → Foundational0.1% Remote · rank 120Trade bloc rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.9Quantum Technologies 1.8
Education pipeline failure9.9 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 88Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.4
Failure of digital lifelines9.4 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 81Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.9Quantum Technologies 1.8
Loss of strategic deterrence4.1 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 33Regional war spillover Extreme + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×4.3Maritime Power 8.3
Broad fall in critical technology4.2 Nascent → Inception— Remote · rank 61AI labour shock Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×3.5Quantum Technologies 1.8
Loss of advanced technology base3.0 Inception— No route · rank 60Already at the foot of the scale×3.9—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Reliable low-cost energy8.1 Foundational → Transitional3.1% Possible · rank 33Clean power threshold Extreme×1.5Energy Technologies 6
Capable digital government10.1 Transitional → Transitional1.5% Possible · rank 44Market access opening Major + Public service leap Extreme×1.9Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 4.6
Trusted public institutions8.3 Foundational → Transitional1.2% Possible · rank 43Market access opening Major + Public service leap Extreme×1.9Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 4.6
Stronger health and biotechnology8.4 Foundational → Transitional0.9% Unlikely · rank 56Chronic disease advance Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.1Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.4
Secure food and water supply12.1 Established → Established0.8% Unlikely · rank 29Market access opening Major + Water-efficient food leap Extreme×1.9Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.4
Broad rise in trade and investment11.4 Transitional → Established0.8% Unlikely · rank 36Market access opening Extreme + Clean power threshold Major×1.9Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 9
Broad rise in governance and integrity9.2 Transitional → Transitional0.8% Unlikely · rank 54Market access opening Severe + Public service leap Extreme×2.4Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 4.6
Higher-value international business10.4 Transitional → Established0.8% Unlikely · rank 34Market access opening Extreme + Clean power threshold Major×1.8Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 9
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure11.1 Transitional → Established0.4% Unlikely · rank 39Market access opening Severe + Clean power threshold Extreme×2.5Energy Technologies 6
Broad rise in production and innovation9.5 Transitional → Transitional0.4% Unlikely · rank 34Market access opening Severe + Clean power threshold Extreme×2.4Energy Technologies 6
Sophisticated export strength11.8 Transitional → Established0.3% Unlikely · rank 39Market access opening Extreme + Clean power threshold Severe×2.3Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 9
Research translated into value8.8 Foundational → Transitional0.1% Remote · rank 45Clean power threshold Extreme + Water-efficient food leap Extreme×2.6Energy Technologies 6
Broad rise in critical technology4.2 Nascent → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 55Clean power threshold Extreme + Water-efficient food leap Extreme×2.8Energy Technologies 6
Broad rise in human capital9.1 Transitional → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 54Market access opening Extreme + Water-efficient food leap Extreme×2.7Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 9
Adaptable skilled workforce8.4 Foundational → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 51Market access opening Extreme + Water-efficient food leap Extreme×2.4Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 9
Deeper long-term finance10.5 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 39Debt service reset Extreme + Clean power threshold Extreme×2.4Energy Technologies 6
Broad rise in financial strength10.6 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 52Clean power threshold Extreme + Chronic disease advance Extreme×2.6Energy Technologies 6
Stronger information environment11.2 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 48Public service leap Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.4
Broad rise in national security8.3 Foundational— No route · rank 54No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.5—
Broad rise in information and influence10.8 Transitional— No route · rank 56No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.0—
Assured space services4.7 Nascent— No route · rank 54No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×4.0—
Frontier AI and compute3.8 Nascent— No route · rank 61No route found · closest 1.5 of 1.5×3.0—
Higher-value manufacturing8.1 Foundational— No route · rank 57No route found · closest 1.5 of 1.5×3.0—
More deployable joint force10.1 Transitional— No route · rank 54No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.0—
Wider international influence10.4 Transitional— No route · rank 61No route found · closest 1.5 of 1.5×3.0—