Indo-Pacific · MMR

Myanmar

Baseline index 3.89Rank 147 of 197NascentIndo-PacificAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Fuel-dependent. Budgets built on oil, gas and commodities: two of the upside scenarios are their downside. One of 15 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
36.5
rank 47 of 197 · 3 years: 36.0
Worst case
−25.9%
Core disaster · tail −22.5%
Opportunity · 10 years
−29.2
rank 192 of 197 · 3 years: −29.0
Best case
+4
Outbreak defence succeeds · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
15%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.31
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: AI labour shock, Trade bloc rupture, Hybrid coercion. Highest exposure indicators: earthquake, storm, flood, drought and volcanic hazards named for the nation; industry as a share of gdp; oil, gas and coal among the top five exports of a net exporter; consumer price inflation; low real gdp per head.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Myanmar’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Core disaster S07High 0.86−1.01−1.21−0.53▼ 1429Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 1.6 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.64−0.81−0.92−0.41▼ 417Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01High 0.65−0.80−0.94−0.42▼ 720Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.71−0.78−0.87−0.39▼ 820Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.62−0.71−0.79−0.35020Political Institutions & Civic Participation 0 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10Medium 0.55−0.71−0.83−0.37019Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.8 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.62−0.56−0.68−0.30▼ 716Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.8 · Inception
Regional war spillover S03Medium 0.41−0.48−0.59−0.26▲ 812Economic Leverage & Dependence 2.7 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02Medium 0.42−0.45−0.52−0.23▲ 813Financial Stability & Crisis Management 1.9 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06Low 0.30−0.38−0.47−0.20▲ 810Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 3 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Core disaster−0.05−1.51−0.49−1.20−0.54−1.35−1.44−1.23−1.23
AI labour shock−0.72−0.42·−1.13−0.99−1.12−0.99−0.97−0.97
Trade bloc rupture−0.86−0.42−0.38−0.42−0.97−0.94−0.97−0.95−1.31
Cryptographic trust break−0.84−0.57−1.05·−1.27−1.19−1.11−0.48−0.55
Legitimacy rupture−0.37−0.46−0.83−0.42−0.97−1.31−1.11−0.42−0.48
Severe pandemic−0.66−0.38−0.31−0.93−0.81−0.87−0.81−0.79−0.79
Hybrid coercion−0.39−0.92−0.92·−1.02−1.05·−0.38−0.38
Regional war spillover−0.26−0.64−0.59−0.25−0.25−0.62−0.58−0.49−0.63
Global funding seizure−0.26−0.30·−0.30−0.27−0.61−0.99−0.70−0.62
Breadbasket failure−0.20−0.48−0.16−0.45−0.43−0.46−0.49−0.37−0.42
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Myanmar is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed+4.38.23.916110Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.2 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−3.25.08.316144Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 2.3 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed−8.97.015.917142Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.2 · Inception
Public service leap S18 ↗Loser−12.98.821.713159Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.6 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−28.47.335.716191Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.2 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Loser−30.24.935.118178Justice System & Fundamental Rights 2.3 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Loser−32.710.543.219189Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 3 · Nascent
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−35.35.240.410192Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.2 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−38.94.143.06185Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.2 · Inception
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Loser−51.66.558.115181Energy Technologies 1.4 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Myanmar, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function3.5 Nascent → Inception1.7% Possible · rank 151Hybrid coercion Major + Core disaster Extreme×1.9Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 3.8
Loss of financial stability3.6 Nascent → Inception1.5% Possible · rank 117Global funding seizure Major + Core disaster Extreme×1.9Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 3.8
Strategic awareness failure3.9 Nascent → Inception0.9% Unlikely · rank 49Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×1.9Quantum Technologies 0.3
Food and water failure6.7 Foundational → Nascent0.9% Unlikely · rank 42Hybrid coercion Major + Core disaster Extreme×1.9Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 3.8
Health system failure5.0 Nascent → Inception0.6% Unlikely · rank 86Hybrid coercion Major + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×1.9Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 3.8
Broad fall in financial strength3.4 Nascent → Inception0.6% Unlikely · rank 149Global funding seizure Major + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.1Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 3.8
Rupture in trade and supply5.3 Nascent → Inception0.6% Unlikely · rank 114Hybrid coercion Severe + Core disaster Extreme×1.9Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 3.8
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure5.9 Nascent → Inception0.4% Unlikely · rank 59Hybrid coercion Severe + Core disaster Extreme×2.0Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 3.8
Loss of industrial capacity4.9 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 80Global funding seizure Major + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.2Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 3.8
Broad fall in governance and integrity3.1 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 180Hybrid coercion Severe + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.2Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 3.8
Broad fall in trade and investment4.2 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 128Trade bloc rupture Extreme + AI labour shock Majorplans fail×2.3Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 2.6
Defence readiness failure7.8 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Unlikely · rank 61Hybrid coercion Severe + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×2.9Political Institutions & Civic Participation 1.3
Collapse in energy security4.7 Nascent → Inception0.2% Remote · rank 105Hybrid coercion Severe + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.4Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 3.8
Broad fall in production and innovation3.9 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 122Global funding seizure Severe + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.4Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 3.8
Broad fall in information and influence3.5 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 133Hybrid coercion Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×2.4Quantum Technologies 0.3
Breakdown of information trust3.4 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 164Hybrid coercion Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 0.3
Broad fall in national security5.3 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 70Hybrid coercion Extreme + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×2.9Information Environment & Strategic Communication 3.7
Failure of digital lifelines4.2 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 88Hybrid coercion Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.6Quantum Technologies 0.3
Diplomatic isolation3.2 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 145Hybrid coercion Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.4Quantum Technologies 0.3
Broad fall in human capital4.5 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 134Core disaster Extreme + AI labour shock Majorplans fail×2.5Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 3.8
Education pipeline failure5.1 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 173Core disaster Extreme + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×2.8Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 3.8
Broad fall in critical technology1.2 Inception— No route · rank 147Already at the foot of the scale×3.5—
Loss of advanced technology base0.8 Inception— No route · rank 147Already at the foot of the scale×4.3—
Loss of strategic deterrence2.1 Inception— No route · rank 147Already at the foot of the scale×4.7—
Rule of law failure2.5 Inception— No route · rank 183Already at the foot of the scale×2.2—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology1.2 Inception— No route · rank 147No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×10—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure5.9 Nascent— No route · rank 147No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.9—
Broad rise in national security5.3 Nascent— No route · rank 147No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×19—
Broad rise in human capital4.5 Nascent— No route · rank 147No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.6—
Broad rise in information and influence3.5 Nascent— No route · rank 147No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×10—
Broad rise in governance and integrity3.1 Nascent— No route · rank 147No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×7.0—
Broad rise in financial strength3.4 Nascent— No route · rank 147No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Broad rise in production and innovation3.9 Nascent— No route · rank 147No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.5—
Broad rise in trade and investment4.2 Nascent— No route · rank 147No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.1—
Assured space services2.1 Inception— No route · rank 147No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—
Frontier AI and compute0.6 Inception— No route · rank 147No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Higher-value manufacturing3.2 Nascent— No route · rank 147No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Reliable low-cost energy3.2 Nascent— No route · rank 147No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.6—
Secure food and water supply6.7 Foundational— No route · rank 147No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.1—
More deployable joint force7.0 Foundational— No route · rank 147No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×19—
Adaptable skilled workforce3.5 Nascent— No route · rank 147No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.6—
Stronger health and biotechnology4.1 Nascent— No route · rank 147No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.3—
Stronger information environment3.8 Nascent— No route · rank 147No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.2—
Wider international influence3.2 Nascent— No route · rank 147No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Capable digital government4.6 Nascent— No route · rank 147No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.7—
Trusted public institutions2.6 Inception— No route · rank 147No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.7—
Deeper long-term finance3.9 Nascent— No route · rank 147No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.1—
Research translated into value3.2 Nascent— No route · rank 147No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.5—
Higher-value international business3.1 Nascent— No route · rank 147No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×5.7—
Sophisticated export strength4.6 Nascent— No route · rank 147No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.1—