Europe · MKD

North Macedonia

Baseline index 6.62Rank 90 of 197FoundationalEuropeAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on vulnerability; the upside mostly passes them by. One of 40 nations with a similar pattern of results.

High stakes over 10 years: higher vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
23.8
rank 92 of 197 · 3 years: 23.5
Worst case
−15.7%
Regional war spillover · tail −13.8%
Opportunity · 10 years
−4.4
rank 87 of 197 · 3 years: −4.2
Best case
+18
Clean power threshold · gainer in 3 of 10
Shock absorbed
27%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.28
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Maritime Power
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Hybrid coercion. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; no coastline; youth unemployment rate; internet users as a share of population; trade in goods and services relative to gdp.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in North Macedonia’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.97−1.04−1.36−0.61▼ 128Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.80−0.87−1.21−0.54▼ 121Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.7 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.80−0.83−1.16−0.52▼ 121Artificial Intelligence 0.6 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.85−0.83−1.03−0.46▼ 119Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01High 0.62−0.67−0.90−0.40017Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02High 0.67−0.58−0.84−0.37016Economic Output & Productivity 5.1 · Nascent
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.71−0.57−0.76−0.34▼ 114Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.60−0.51−0.77−0.34▲ 215Information Environment & Strategic Communication 3.8 · Nascent
Core disaster S07Medium 0.47−0.42−0.66−0.29▲ 415Trade Facilitation & Logistics 6.1 · Foundational
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.37−0.41−0.58−0.25▲ 314Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 5.2 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.58−1.43−1.07−0.55−0.55−1.38−1.28−1.10−1.42
Severe pandemic−0.86−0.47−0.34−1.14−1.00−1.07−1.00−0.98−0.98
AI labour shock−0.85−0.42·−1.13−0.99−1.16−0.99−0.97−0.97
Cryptographic trust break−0.97−0.61−1.01·−1.35−1.27−1.19−0.51−0.58
Trade bloc rupture−0.79−0.35−0.28−0.35−0.81−0.78−0.81−0.79−1.09
Global funding seizure−0.34−0.38·−0.38−0.35−0.78−1.27−0.89−0.79
Hybrid coercion−0.43−0.96−0.80·−1.07−1.10·−0.40−0.40
Legitimacy rupture−0.30−0.33−0.54−0.30−0.70−0.97−0.79−0.30−0.34
Core disaster−0.02−0.64−0.18−0.51−0.23−0.57−0.61−0.52−0.52
Breadbasket failure−0.21−0.51−0.16−0.48−0.46−0.49−0.52−0.39−0.45
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what North Macedonia is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Gainer+18.318.80.52150Energy Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+16.919.62.72665Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.4 · Inception
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Gainer+16.017.61.63451Intelligence & Assessment 5.2 · Nascent
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed+1.79.57.82865Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2.4 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed−7.519.126.537100Investment Attraction & Projection 6.7 · Foundational
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−7.65.012.641183Energy Infrastructure 7.1 · Foundational
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed−8.16.814.926136Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.4 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Mixed−9.29.418.61991Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.7 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−15.610.526.11277Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.7 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−16.519.435.927162Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.4 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for North Macedonia, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function10.3 Transitional → Foundational5.2% Likely · rank 21Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severe×1.8Maritime Power 0
Rupture in trade and supply7.1 Foundational → Nascent3.2% Possible · rank 9Regional war spillover Extreme×1.6Maritime Power 0
Loss of financial stability8.7 Foundational → Nascent2.8% Possible · rank 48Global funding seizure Major + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.2Maritime Power 0
Broad fall in governance and integrity9.9 Transitional → Foundational2.6% Possible · rank 18Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 0.8
Breakdown of information trust6.9 Foundational → Nascent1.8% Possible · rank 7Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 0.8
Broad fall in trade and investment7.3 Foundational → Nascent1.6% Possible · rank 10Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.1Maritime Power 0
Broad fall in financial strength8.1 Foundational → Nascent1.5% Possible · rank 64Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Maritime Power 0
Strategic awareness failure3.3 Nascent → Inception1.4% Possible · rank 35Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×1.9Quantum Technologies 0.8
Rule of law failure9.8 Transitional → Foundational1.3% Possible · rank 25Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 0.8
Diplomatic isolation6.0 Foundational → Inception1.2% Possible · rank 9Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 0.8
Collapse in energy security4.1 Nascent → Inception1.1% Possible · rank 33Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Major×1.6Maritime Power 0
Broad fall in information and influence5.8 Nascent → Inception1.1% Possible · rank 18Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 0.8
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure7.2 Foundational → Nascent0.8% Unlikely · rank 17Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×2.1Maritime Power 0
Loss of industrial capacity7.7 Foundational → Nascent0.8% Unlikely · rank 12Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.4
Health system failure9.7 Transitional → Foundational0.8% Unlikely · rank 69Breadbasket failure Major + Severe pandemic Extreme×1.8Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.4
Broad fall in production and innovation7.6 Foundational → Nascent0.7% Unlikely · rank 16Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.4
Failure of digital lifelines7.0 Foundational → Nascent0.5% Unlikely · rank 39Hybrid coercion Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail×2.2Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 4
Food and water failure8.2 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 109Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×2.7Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 4
Broad fall in human capital9.0 Transitional → Nascent0.2% Remote · rank 51Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.4
Education pipeline failure10.0 Transitional → Foundational0.1% Remote · rank 56Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.8Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.4
Broad fall in critical technology1.5 Inception— No route · rank 91Already at the foot of the scale×3.1—
Broad fall in national security3.2 Nascent— No route · rank 100No route found · closest 2.7 of 3×2.8—
Loss of advanced technology base1.0 Inception— No route · rank 91Already at the foot of the scale×3.9—
Defence readiness failure3.7 Nascent— No route · rank 127No route found · closest 2.7 of 3×3.6—
Loss of strategic deterrence1.0 Inception— No route · rank 91Already at the foot of the scale×3.0—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Stronger health and biotechnology7.2 Foundational → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 83Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×3.1Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.4
Reliable low-cost energy4.2 Nascent → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 74Middle East settlement Extreme + Clean power threshold Extreme×2.7Energy Technologies 1.2
Broad rise in critical technology1.5 Inception— No route · rank 90No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.6—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure7.2 Foundational— No route · rank 90No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.4—
Broad rise in national security3.2 Nascent— No route · rank 90No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.2—
Broad rise in human capital9.0 Transitional— No route · rank 90No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.6—
Broad rise in information and influence5.8 Nascent— No route · rank 90No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.3—
Broad rise in governance and integrity9.9 Transitional— No route · rank 93No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.7—
Broad rise in financial strength8.1 Foundational— No route · rank 90No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.4—
Broad rise in production and innovation7.6 Foundational— No route · rank 90No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.1—
Broad rise in trade and investment7.3 Foundational— No route · rank 91No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.3—
Assured space services1.1 Inception— No route · rank 90No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.8—
Frontier AI and compute1.5 Inception— No route · rank 90No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.8—
Higher-value manufacturing4.7 Nascent— No route · rank 90No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.1—
Secure food and water supply8.2 Foundational— No route · rank 92No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.1—
More deployable joint force3.5 Nascent— No route · rank 90No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.7—
Adaptable skilled workforce8.4 Foundational— No route · rank 90No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.2—
Stronger information environment5.7 Nascent— No route · rank 90No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.8—
Wider international influence6.0 Foundational— No route · rank 90No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.4—
Capable digital government9.4 Transitional— No route · rank 99No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.8—
Trusted public institutions9.4 Transitional— No route · rank 97No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×4.1—
Deeper long-term finance7.7 Foundational— No route · rank 90No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.3—
Research translated into value6.8 Foundational— No route · rank 90No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.6—
Higher-value international business7.3 Foundational— No route · rank 92No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.1—
Sophisticated export strength7.9 Foundational— No route · rank 90No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.9—