Europe · POL

Poland

Baseline index 12.39Rank 25 of 197EstablishedEuropeAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Anchors. Absorb most shocks and take most of the upside. One of 27 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
9.8
rank 164 of 197 · 3 years: 9.7
Worst case
−5.5%
Regional war spillover · tail −5.2%
Opportunity · 10 years
+20.4
rank 25 of 197 · 3 years: +20.7
Best case
+48
Clean power threshold · gainer in 6 of 10
Shock absorbed
48%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.09
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
6of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Maritime Power
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Hybrid coercion, Regional war spillover, AI labour shock. Highest exposure indicators: land border with russia or belarus; share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; refugees hosted per head of population; internet users as a share of population; share of population aged 65 and over.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Poland’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.89−0.68−1.30−0.56▼ 118Maritime Power 7.3 · Foundational
Severe pandemic S10High 0.79−0.63−1.22−0.53016Biotechnology & Health Technologies 10 · Transitional
AI labour shock S08High 0.80−0.62−1.19−0.52016Artificial Intelligence 9.1 · Transitional
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.85−0.60−1.08−0.47012Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 9.4 · Transitional
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.91−0.52−1.01−0.44▼ 113Maritime Power 7.4 · Foundational
Trade bloc rupture S01High 0.60−0.47−0.89−0.3909Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 5.2 · Nascent
Global funding seizure S02High 0.65−0.41−0.82−0.36▼ 19Investment Attraction & Projection 11.7 · Transitional
Legitimacy rupture S05Medium 0.47−0.32−0.61−0.27▲ 17Justice System & Fundamental Rights 11.5 · Transitional
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.37−0.30−0.58−0.25▼ 16Energy Infrastructure 10.9 · Transitional
Core disaster S07Medium 0.40−0.28−0.56−0.24▲ 14Energy Infrastructure 10.9 · Transitional

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.39−0.91−0.84−0.35−0.35−0.88−0.82−0.70−0.90
Severe pandemic−0.67−0.34−0.27−0.81−0.71−0.76−0.71−0.70−0.70
AI labour shock−0.69−0.31·−0.84−0.73−0.87−0.73−0.72−0.72
Cryptographic trust break−0.78−0.43−0.78·−0.95−0.89−0.83−0.36−0.41
Hybrid coercion−0.38−0.84−0.84·−0.93−0.96·−0.35−0.35
Trade bloc rupture−0.62−0.24−0.21−0.24−0.56−0.54−0.56−0.54−0.75
Global funding seizure−0.25−0.27·−0.28−0.25−0.56−0.91−0.64−0.57
Legitimacy rupture−0.18−0.20−0.37−0.18−0.43−0.60−0.49−0.18−0.21
Breadbasket failure−0.16−0.38−0.13−0.35−0.34−0.36−0.39−0.29−0.33
Core disaster−0.01−0.41−0.13−0.33−0.15−0.37−0.39−0.34−0.34
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Poland is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Gainer+47.547.80.35513Energy Technologies 9.4 · Transitional
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+44.045.71.76023Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11.2 · Transitional
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Gainer+37.038.00.9627Energy Infrastructure 11.5 · Transitional
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Gainer+20.345.525.26130Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11.2 · Transitional
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Gainer+19.136.617.44324Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 6.2 · Foundational
Public service leap S18 ↗Gainer+10.115.45.45930Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 10.8 · Transitional
Great-power détente S13 ↗Mixed+9.721.011.44726Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 6.2 · Foundational
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed+8.026.818.86241Energy Infrastructure 11.5 · Transitional
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed+6.715.18.36060Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11.2 · Transitional
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−3.44.07.462147Energy Infrastructure 11.5 · Transitional

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Poland, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function13.7 Established → Transitional3.5% Possible · rank 60Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.5Quantum Technologies 7.3
Strategic awareness failure12.0 Transitional → Foundational2.2% Possible · rank 8Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.5Quantum Technologies 7.3
Broad fall in governance and integrity13.1 Established → Transitional1.6% Possible · rank 75Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×3.1Energy Infrastructure 11.5
Collapse in energy security11.1 Transitional → Foundational1.4% Possible · rank 13Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail×2.6Maritime Power 8.8
Loss of financial stability13.6 Established → Transitional1.2% Possible · rank 138Global funding seizure Extremeplans fail×3.0Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 10.6
Breakdown of information trust12.8 Established → Transitional0.9% Unlikely · rank 54Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.2Energy Infrastructure 11.5
Broad fall in financial strength13.1 Established → Transitional0.9% Unlikely · rank 124Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.3Maritime Power 8.8
Defence readiness failure12.9 Established → Transitional0.9% Unlikely · rank 12Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×3.4Energy Infrastructure 11.5
Rule of law failure12.4 Established → Transitional0.9% Unlikely · rank 60Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.2Quantum Technologies 7.3
Broad fall in national security11.0 Transitional → Foundational0.8% Unlikely · rank 12Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.5Energy Infrastructure 11.5
Rupture in trade and supply13.4 Established → Transitional0.8% Unlikely · rank 103Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.4Maritime Power 8.8
Broad fall in information and influence12.7 Established → Transitional0.8% Unlikely · rank 47Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.2Energy Infrastructure 11.5
Diplomatic isolation12.8 Established → Transitional0.7% Unlikely · rank 51Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.2Energy Infrastructure 11.5
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure12.9 Established → Transitional0.7% Unlikely · rank 26Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×3.3Maritime Power 8.8
Failure of digital lifelines12.8 Established → Transitional0.7% Unlikely · rank 26Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.2Energy Infrastructure 11.5
Broad fall in trade and investment13.2 Established → Transitional0.5% Unlikely · rank 67Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×3.3Maritime Power 8.8
Health system failure12.7 Established → Transitional0.3% Unlikely · rank 159Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×2.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11.2
Broad fall in production and innovation12.9 Established → Transitional0.2% Unlikely · rank 92Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×4.2Maritime Power 8.8
Loss of industrial capacity13.6 Established → Transitional0.2% Unlikely · rank 113Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×4.2Maritime Power 8.8
Broad fall in critical technology9.4 Transitional → Nascent0.2% Remote · rank 31Trade bloc rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×3.8Quantum Technologies 7.3
Loss of advanced technology base8.1 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Remote · rank 27Trade bloc rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×4.2Quantum Technologies 7.3
Food and water failure12.7 Established → Transitional0.2% Remote · rank 148Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×4.3Energy Infrastructure 11.5
Broad fall in human capital13.3 Established → Transitional0.1% Remote · rank 96Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11.2
Loss of strategic deterrence6.7 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 14Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×4.3Maritime Power 8.8
Education pipeline failure14.2 Established → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 95Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.8Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11.2
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Stronger health and biotechnology12.2 Established → Established7.6% Likely · rank 23Chronic disease advance Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.3Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11.2
Frontier AI and compute8.3 Foundational → Transitional5.1% Likely · rank 24Clean power threshold Major + Automated discovery step Severe×1.4Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 6.2
Capable digital government13.6 Established → Advanced4.9% Possible · rank 28Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11.2
Trusted public institutions12.6 Established → Established4.9% Possible · rank 25Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11.2
Reliable low-cost energy10.4 Transitional → Established4.8% Possible · rank 19Clean power threshold Severe + Automated discovery step Major×1.1Energy Technologies 9.4
Broad rise in governance and integrity13.1 Established → Established4.5% Possible · rank 25Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11.2
Broad rise in critical technology9.4 Transitional → Transitional3.7% Possible · rank 23Clean power threshold Severe + Automated discovery step Severe×1.8Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 6.2
Research translated into value12.3 Established → Established2.5% Possible · rank 23Clean power threshold Severe + Automated discovery step Severe×1.6Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 6.2
Broad rise in human capital13.3 Established → Established2.3% Possible · rank 24Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×2.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11.2
Broad rise in trade and investment13.2 Established → Established2.1% Possible · rank 28Automated discovery step Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×1.9Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11.2
Higher-value manufacturing12.0 Established → Established2.0% Possible · rank 23Clean power threshold Severe + Automated discovery step Severe×1.8Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 6.2
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure12.9 Established → Established1.8% Possible · rank 25Clean power threshold Extreme + Automated discovery step Major×1.7Energy Technologies 9.4
Broad rise in production and innovation12.9 Established → Established1.8% Possible · rank 23Clean power threshold Severe + Automated discovery step Severe×1.6Energy Technologies 9.4
Sophisticated export strength13.6 Established → Advanced1.6% Possible · rank 27Great-power détente Major + Clean power threshold Extreme×2.1Energy Technologies 9.4
Higher-value international business12.9 Established → Established1.4% Possible · rank 25Market access opening Major + Clean power threshold Extreme×2.1Energy Technologies 9.4
Broad rise in financial strength13.1 Established → Established1.1% Possible · rank 21Clean power threshold Extreme + Automated discovery step Major×1.8Energy Technologies 9.4
Secure food and water supply12.7 Established → Established1.0% Unlikely · rank 26Automated discovery step Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.1Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11.2
Wider international influence12.8 Established → Established0.8% Unlikely · rank 21Market access opening Major + Middle East settlement Extreme×1.6Energy Infrastructure 11.5
Deeper long-term finance12.9 Established → Established0.8% Unlikely · rank 20Clean power threshold Extreme + Automated discovery step Major×1.7Energy Technologies 9.4
Stronger information environment12.6 Established → Established0.8% Unlikely · rank 25Chronic disease advance Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×1.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11.2
Adaptable skilled workforce12.8 Established → Established0.7% Unlikely · rank 28Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.2Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11.2
Assured space services9.0 Foundational → Transitional0.4% Unlikely · rank 22Automated discovery step Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11.2
Broad rise in information and influence12.7 Established → Established0.4% Unlikely · rank 26Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×1.9Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11.2
Broad rise in national security11.0 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 25Middle East settlement Severe + Automated discovery step Extreme×2.4Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 6.2
More deployable joint force12.4 Established → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 26Middle East settlement Extreme + Automated discovery step Extreme×2.6Energy Infrastructure 11.5