Latin America and Caribbean · KNA

Saint Kitts & Nevis

Baseline index 3.83Rank 150 of 197NascentLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Fragile and exposed. Highly vulnerable importers of fuel, finance and food. One of 35 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
36.8
rank 44 of 197 · 3 years: 36.5
Worst case
−23.0%
Regional war spillover · tail −20.8%
Opportunity · 10 years
−13.9
rank 156 of 197 · 3 years: −13.7
Best case
+6
Clean power threshold · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
17%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.30
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
9of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Global funding seizure. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; little renewable water per head; internet users as a share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Saint Kitts & Nevis’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.81−0.88−1.02−0.47▼ 122Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10High 0.67−0.77−0.93−0.42▼ 219Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.67−0.74−0.90−0.40017Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Global funding seizure S02High 0.73−0.69−0.87−0.38▼ 214Economic Output & Productivity 1.3 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.74−0.67−0.87−0.39▲ 215Force Generation & Mobilisation 0.3 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.53−0.64−0.79−0.35▲ 315Energy Infrastructure 2 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.67−0.62−0.69−0.33013Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.54−0.61−0.70−0.31▼ 116Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Core disaster S07Medium 0.59−0.61−0.80−0.35▲ 112Energy Infrastructure 1.9 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04Low 0.33−0.30−0.34−0.15▲ 35Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.2 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.19−1.22−0.60−0.52−0.52−1.30−1.21−1.04−1.34
Severe pandemic−0.19−0.46−0.27−1.11−0.97−1.04−0.97−0.95−0.95
AI labour shock−0.19−0.42·−1.11−0.97−1.14−0.97−0.95−0.95
Global funding seizure−0.16−0.48·−0.48−0.43−0.97−1.59−1.11−0.99
Legitimacy rupture−0.16−0.46−0.56−0.42−0.98−1.37−1.12−0.42−0.48
Breadbasket failure−0.16−0.82−0.22−0.79−0.75−0.80−0.86−0.64−0.74
Cryptographic trust break−0.19−0.54−0.57·−1.19−1.12−1.04−0.45−0.51
Trade bloc rupture−0.19−0.35−0.24−0.35−0.82−0.79−0.82−0.80−1.10
Core disaster−0.03−0.91−0.22−0.74−0.33−0.83−0.88−0.76−0.76
Hybrid coercion−0.11−0.53−0.42·−0.59−0.61·−0.22−0.22
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Saint Kitts & Nevis is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Mixed+6.48.82.412102Energy Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed+1.48.36.814140Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−3.04.57.525142Energy Infrastructure 3.3 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed−3.24.77.916142Intelligence & Assessment 1.2 · Inception
Public service leap S18 ↗Loser−11.48.019.316143Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Loser−13.812.426.120131Energy Infrastructure 3.3 · Nascent
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Loser−17.06.423.413180Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−18.34.422.79158Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Loser−25.711.136.815188Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−26.22.128.44139Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Saint Kitts & Nevis, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function7.8 Foundational → Nascent3.2% Possible · rank 72Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severe×1.9Resource Infrastructure 1.3
Loss of financial stability5.9 Nascent → Inception2.8% Possible · rank 49Global funding seizure Severe + Regional war spillover Severe×1.7Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4
Broad fall in financial strength5.6 Nascent → Inception1.9% Possible · rank 33Global funding seizure Extremeplans fail×1.9Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4
Broad fall in governance and integrity7.1 Foundational → Nascent1.4% Possible · rank 91Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.2Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2.3
Rupture in trade and supply4.2 Nascent → Inception1.4% Possible · rank 45Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×1.6Resource Infrastructure 1.3
Health system failure7.3 Foundational → Nascent0.9% Unlikely · rank 55Breadbasket failure Major + Severe pandemic Extreme×1.8Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4
Rule of law failure6.9 Foundational → Nascent0.8% Unlikely · rank 72Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.1Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2.3
Broad fall in trade and investment4.0 Nascent → Inception0.7% Unlikely · rank 52Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.2Resource Infrastructure 1.3
Loss of industrial capacity3.5 Nascent → Inception0.4% Unlikely · rank 72Trade bloc rupture Severe + Global funding seizure Extremeplans fail×2.5Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4
Food and water failure4.7 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 95Regional war spillover Severe + Breadbasket failure Extreme×2.3Agriculture & Food Infrastructure 3.8
Broad fall in human capital6.3 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Remote · rank 52Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4
Education pipeline failure7.5 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Remote · rank 35Breadbasket failure Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.9Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4
Broad fall in production and innovation3.8 Nascent → Inception0.2% Remote · rank 110Global funding seizure Extreme + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.7Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4
Breakdown of information trust4.0 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 163Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×2.1Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2.3
Broad fall in critical technology0.2 Inception— No route · rank 150Already at the foot of the scale×16—
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure3.8 Nascent → Inception— Remote · rank 175Regional war spillover Extreme + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.5Resource Infrastructure 1.3
Broad fall in national security0.7 Inception— No route · rank 151Already at the foot of the scale×5.0—
Broad fall in information and influence2.9 Inception— No route · rank 166Already at the foot of the scale×2.5—
Loss of advanced technology base0.0 Inception— No route · rank 150Already at the foot of the scale——
Collapse in energy security1.7 Inception— No route · rank 153Already at the foot of the scale×2.3—
Failure of digital lifelines4.0 Nascent— No route · rank 154No route found · closest 2.6 of 3×3.5—
Defence readiness failure0.9 Inception— No route · rank 157Already at the foot of the scale×4.3—
Loss of strategic deterrence0.2 Inception— No route · rank 150Already at the foot of the scale×13—
Strategic awareness failure0.8 Inception— No route · rank 151Already at the foot of the scale×3.6—
Diplomatic isolation3.1 Nascent— No route · rank 173No route found · closest 2.7 of 3×2.5—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology0.2 Inception— No route · rank 150No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.2—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure3.8 Nascent— No route · rank 150No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.7—
Broad rise in national security0.7 Inception— No route · rank 150No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×19—
Broad rise in human capital6.3 Foundational— No route · rank 150No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.3—
Broad rise in information and influence2.9 Inception— No route · rank 150No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×10—
Broad rise in governance and integrity7.1 Foundational— No route · rank 150No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.5—
Broad rise in financial strength5.6 Nascent— No route · rank 150No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.7—
Broad rise in production and innovation3.8 Nascent— No route · rank 150No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×8.1—
Broad rise in trade and investment4.0 Nascent— No route · rank 150No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.1—
Assured space services0.3 Inception— No route · rank 150No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×14—
Frontier AI and compute0.2 Inception— No route · rank 150No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.0—
Higher-value manufacturing1.4 Inception— No route · rank 150No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×11—
Reliable low-cost energy1.9 Inception— No route · rank 150No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.7—
Secure food and water supply4.7 Nascent— No route · rank 150No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.8—
More deployable joint force1.0 Inception— No route · rank 150No route found · closest 0.2 of 1.5×21—
Adaptable skilled workforce5.0 Nascent— No route · rank 150No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.5—
Stronger health and biotechnology5.0 Nascent— No route · rank 150No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.4—
Stronger information environment2.8 Inception— No route · rank 150No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.0—
Wider international influence3.1 Nascent— No route · rank 150No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Capable digital government6.3 Foundational— No route · rank 150No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×6.0—
Trusted public institutions6.4 Foundational— No route · rank 150No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×6.3—
Deeper long-term finance5.3 Nascent— No route · rank 150No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×9.1—
Research translated into value2.9 Inception— No route · rank 150No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.1—
Higher-value international business4.1 Nascent— No route · rank 150No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×4.8—
Sophisticated export strength3.7 Nascent— No route · rank 150No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.0—