Indo-Pacific · TWN

Taiwan

Baseline index 14.05Rank 17 of 197EstablishedIndo-PacificAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Anchors. Absorb most shocks and take most of the upside. One of 27 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
8.5
rank 173 of 197 · 3 years: 8.4
Worst case
−5.3%
Regional war spillover · tail −4.7%
Opportunity · 10 years
+38.7
rank 5 of 197 · 3 years: +39.1
Best case
+58
Outbreak defence succeeds · gainer in 9 of 10
Shock absorbed
54%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.06
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks
weakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, Hybrid coercion, AI labour shock. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; little renewable water per head; internet users as a share of population; share of exports going to china and the united states; share of population aged 65 and over; urban share of population; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; earthquake, storm, flood, drought and volcanic hazards named for the nation.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Taiwan’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.96−0.75−1.41−0.62▼ 126Resource Infrastructure 8.5 · Foundational
AI labour shock S08High 0.95−0.63−1.41−0.59▼ 120Artificial Intelligence 11.1 · Transitional
Trade bloc rupture S01High 0.88−0.62−1.32−0.54▼ 222Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 5.8 · Nascent
Severe pandemic S10High 0.86−0.60−1.35−0.57022Biotechnology & Health Technologies 12.1 · Established
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.95−0.58−1.23−0.53018Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 5.7 · Nascent
Core disaster S07High 0.86−0.50−1.21−0.50▼ 118Energy Infrastructure 12.4 · Established
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.75−0.43−0.84−0.37010Alliances & Security Cooperation 7.4 · Foundational
Breadbasket failure S06Medium 0.45−0.31−0.70−0.30010Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 6.4 · Foundational
Global funding seizure S02Medium 0.51−0.28−0.64−0.28014Labour & Employment 12.8 · Established
Legitimacy rupture S05Medium 0.46−0.27−0.61−0.2608Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.7 · Established

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.42−0.99−0.99−0.38−0.38−0.95−0.89−0.76−0.98
AI labour shock−0.70−0.32·−0.84−0.74−0.87−0.74−0.72−0.72
Trade bloc rupture−0.81−0.31−0.31−0.31−0.73−0.70−0.73−0.71−0.98
Severe pandemic−0.63−0.32−0.29−0.76−0.67−0.72−0.67−0.66−0.66
Cryptographic trust break−0.74−0.40−0.81·−0.90−0.84−0.79−0.34−0.39
Core disaster−0.03−0.75−0.27−0.59−0.27−0.67−0.71−0.61−0.61
Hybrid coercion−0.31−0.69−0.74·−0.76−0.79·−0.29−0.29
Breadbasket failure−0.16−0.39−0.15−0.36−0.35−0.37−0.40−0.30−0.34
Global funding seizure−0.17−0.19·−0.19−0.17−0.38−0.63−0.44−0.39
Legitimacy rupture−0.15−0.17−0.34−0.15−0.36−0.50−0.41−0.15−0.18
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Taiwan is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+57.659.21.67113Biotechnology & Health Technologies 13.2 · Established
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Gainer+57.558.10.6605Resource Infrastructure 10 · Transitional
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Gainer+50.859.08.26813Artificial Intelligence 12.3 · Established
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Gainer+39.357.618.37214Biotechnology & Health Technologies 13.2 · Established
Market access opening S12 ↗Gainer+30.140.210.1716Trade Policy & Market Access 13.5 · Established
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Gainer+27.132.04.9716Biotechnology & Health Technologies 13.2 · Established
Great-power détente S13 ↗Gainer+24.644.820.25314Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 7 · Foundational
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Gainer+24.525.20.65028Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 7 · Foundational
Public service leap S18 ↗Gainer+23.429.76.3742Justice System & Fundamental Rights 14.3 · Established
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed+3.36.73.47255Energy Infrastructure 13.5 · Established

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Taiwan, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function15.6 Advanced → Established3.9% Possible · rank 45Regional war spillover Major + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×2.6Alliances & Security Cooperation 8.5
Broad fall in governance and integrity15.2 Advanced → Transitional2.0% Possible · rank 41Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×3.2Alliances & Security Cooperation 8.5
Loss of financial stability15.3 Advanced → Transitional1.3% Possible · rank 130Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×3.2Alliances & Security Cooperation 8.5
Broad fall in financial strength14.9 Established → Transitional1.2% Possible · rank 82Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×3.4Alliances & Security Cooperation 8.5
Broad fall in trade and investment15.2 Advanced → Established1.2% Possible · rank 18Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×3.1Alliances & Security Cooperation 8.5
Breakdown of information trust13.4 Established → Transitional1.2% Possible · rank 34AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×3.3Artificial Intelligence 12.3
Collapse in energy security11.3 Transitional → Foundational1.2% Possible · rank 28Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail×2.4Alliances & Security Cooperation 8.5
Strategic awareness failure13.6 Established → Transitional1.1% Possible · rank 43Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.7Quantum Technologies 9.5
Rupture in trade and supply15.7 Advanced → Established1.0% Possible · rank 84Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.3Alliances & Security Cooperation 8.5
Broad fall in information and influence11.0 Transitional → Foundational1.0% Unlikely · rank 29Trade bloc rupture Severe + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×3.3Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 7
Diplomatic isolation8.7 Foundational → Nascent0.8% Unlikely · rank 42Trade bloc rupture Severe + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×3.3Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 7
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure14.5 Established → Transitional0.8% Unlikely · rank 22Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×3.0Alliances & Security Cooperation 8.5
Health system failure15.7 Advanced → Established0.8% Unlikely · rank 77Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×2.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 13.2
Broad fall in national security11.9 Transitional → Foundational0.8% Unlikely · rank 14Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×3.0Alliances & Security Cooperation 8.5
Rule of law failure14.6 Established → Transitional0.7% Unlikely · rank 94Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.3Quantum Technologies 9.5
Loss of industrial capacity15.4 Advanced → Established0.6% Unlikely · rank 34Hybrid coercion Major + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×4.0Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 15
Defence readiness failure14.0 Established → Transitional0.6% Unlikely · rank 22Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×3.2Alliances & Security Cooperation 8.5
Failure of digital lifelines15.3 Advanced → Transitional0.5% Unlikely · rank 34Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.3Quantum Technologies 9.5
Food and water failure14.7 Established → Transitional0.5% Unlikely · rank 61Hybrid coercion Severe + Core disaster Severeplans fail×3.8Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 15
Broad fall in human capital15.4 Advanced → Established0.5% Unlikely · rank 4AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×3.6Artificial Intelligence 12.3
Loss of advanced technology base12.7 Established → Transitional0.5% Unlikely · rank 4Trade bloc rupture Extremeplans fail×3.2Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 7
Broad fall in production and innovation15.5 Advanced → Established0.5% Unlikely · rank 36Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×4.0Alliances & Security Cooperation 8.5
Broad fall in critical technology12.8 Established → Transitional0.4% Unlikely · rank 10Trade bloc rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.7Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 7
Education pipeline failure15.7 Advanced → Established0.2% Unlikely · rank 26Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.8Biotechnology & Health Technologies 13.2
Loss of strategic deterrence7.9 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Unlikely · rank 3Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail×3.0Alliances & Security Cooperation 8.5
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Stronger health and biotechnology14.8 Established → Advanced21% Likely · rank 6Chronic disease advance Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Major×1.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 13.2
Frontier AI and compute15.3 Advanced → Advanced19% Likely · rank 9Automated discovery step Severe×0.9Artificial Intelligence 12.3
Reliable low-cost energy11.9 Transitional → Established19% Likely · rank 7Clean power threshold Severe×0.9Resource Infrastructure 10
Trusted public institutions14.8 Established → Advanced18% Likely · rank 6Automated discovery step Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.4Biotechnology & Health Technologies 13.2
Capable digital government16.0 Advanced → Advanced18% Likely · rank 8Automated discovery step Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.3Biotechnology & Health Technologies 13.2
Broad rise in governance and integrity15.2 Advanced → Advanced15% Likely · rank 8Chronic disease advance Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.2Biotechnology & Health Technologies 13.2
Broad rise in critical technology12.8 Established → Established14% Likely · rank 9Clean power threshold Major + Automated discovery step Severe×1.1Artificial Intelligence 12.3
Broad rise in trade and investment15.2 Advanced → Advanced12% Likely · rank 5Market access opening Major + Great-power détente Severe×1.3Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 7
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure14.5 Established → Advanced12% Likely · rank 2Clean power threshold Major + Automated discovery step Severe×1.4Artificial Intelligence 12.3
Broad rise in human capital15.4 Advanced → Advanced11% Likely · rank 2Automated discovery step Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 13.2
Research translated into value16.1 Advanced → Frontier11% Likely · rank 11Clean power threshold Major + Automated discovery step Severe×1.0Artificial Intelligence 12.3 · reaches Frontier
Higher-value international business14.7 Established → Advanced8.7% Likely · rank 7Market access opening Severe + Clean power threshold Major×1.5Trade Policy & Market Access 13.5
Sophisticated export strength15.4 Advanced → Advanced8.7% Likely · rank 8Great-power détente Severe + Automated discovery step Major×1.1Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 7
Broad rise in production and innovation15.5 Advanced → Advanced8.6% Likely · rank 9Clean power threshold Major + Automated discovery step Severe×1.3Artificial Intelligence 12.3
Higher-value manufacturing15.4 Advanced → Advanced8.2% Likely · rank 10Clean power threshold Major + Automated discovery step Severe×1.1Artificial Intelligence 12.3
Secure food and water supply14.7 Established → Advanced6.7% Likely · rank 8Water-efficient food leap Extreme×1.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 13.2
Broad rise in financial strength14.9 Established → Advanced5.9% Likely · rank 5Clean power threshold Extreme×1.5Resource Infrastructure 10
Adaptable skilled workforce14.4 Established → Advanced4.7% Possible · rank 9Automated discovery step Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 13.2
Deeper long-term finance14.6 Established → Advanced3.8% Possible · rank 6Clean power threshold Extreme×1.4Resource Infrastructure 10
Assured space services10.7 Transitional → Established2.7% Possible · rank 9Automated discovery step Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.7Artificial Intelligence 12.3
Wider international influence8.7 Foundational → Transitional2.2% Possible · rank 8Great-power détente Severe + Automated discovery step Severe×1.3Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 7
Stronger information environment13.3 Established → Established1.8% Possible · rank 10Automated discovery step Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.3Biotechnology & Health Technologies 13.2
Broad rise in national security11.9 Transitional → Established1.6% Possible · rank 10Great-power détente Severe + Automated discovery step Severe×1.7Artificial Intelligence 12.3
More deployable joint force13.5 Established → Advanced1.6% Possible · rank 10Great-power détente Severe + Automated discovery step Severe×1.7Artificial Intelligence 12.3
Broad rise in information and influence11.0 Transitional → Established1.5% Possible · rank 11Automated discovery step Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×1.4Biotechnology & Health Technologies 13.2