Indo-Pacific · THA

Thailand

Baseline index 10.70Rank 40 of 197TransitionalIndo-PacificAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Low vulnerability, and gains from open markets and digital public services. One of 39 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
11.4
rank 155 of 197 · 3 years: 11.2
Worst case
−7.0%
Cryptographic trust break · tail −6.7%
Opportunity · 10 years
+12.1
rank 37 of 197 · 3 years: +12.4
Best case
+36
Outbreak defence succeeds · gainer in 4 of 10
Shock absorbed
42%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.13
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: AI labour shock, Trade bloc rupture, Regional war spillover. Highest exposure indicators: internet users as a share of population; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; industry as a share of gdp.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Thailand’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.86−0.75−1.10−0.48▼ 124Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 4.8 · Nascent
AI labour shock S08High 0.81−0.71−1.20−0.53▼ 123Artificial Intelligence 5.9 · Nascent
Severe pandemic S10High 0.78−0.68−1.20−0.53▲ 120Biotechnology & Health Technologies 7.7 · Foundational
Trade bloc rupture S01High 0.80−0.67−1.19−0.52▼ 220Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 3.6 · Nascent
Regional war spillover S03High 0.80−0.66−1.17−0.51▲ 123Strategic Strike & Missile Defence 5.3 · Nascent
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.71−0.48−0.79−0.34016Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 6 · Nascent
Global funding seizure S02Medium 0.57−0.38−0.71−0.31▲ 110Labour & Employment 9.6 · Transitional
Core disaster S07Medium 0.48−0.36−0.67−0.29▲ 213Energy Infrastructure 9.9 · Transitional
Legitimacy rupture S05Medium 0.40−0.32−0.52−0.23▲ 212Political Institutions & Civic Participation 8.2 · Foundational
Breadbasket failure S06Low 0.29−0.24−0.45−0.20▲ 39Energy Infrastructure 10.2 · Transitional

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Cryptographic trust break−0.97−0.53−0.97·−1.18−1.10−1.03−0.44−0.50
AI labour shock−0.79−0.36·−0.96−0.84−0.99−0.84−0.82−0.82
Severe pandemic−0.73−0.36−0.30−0.88−0.77−0.83−0.77−0.76−0.76
Trade bloc rupture−0.88−0.34−0.31−0.34−0.79−0.76−0.79−0.78−1.07
Regional war spillover−0.37−0.89−0.82−0.34−0.34−0.85−0.79−0.68−0.88
Hybrid coercion−0.36−0.78−0.78·−0.86−0.89·−0.32−0.32
Global funding seizure−0.23−0.25·−0.25−0.23−0.51−0.83−0.58−0.52
Core disaster−0.02−0.53−0.17−0.42−0.19−0.48−0.51−0.44−0.44
Legitimacy rupture−0.19−0.21−0.38−0.19−0.44−0.61−0.50−0.19−0.22
Breadbasket failure−0.13−0.30−0.10−0.28−0.27−0.29−0.31−0.23−0.27
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Thailand is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+36.338.21.95135Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9 · Transitional
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Gainer+32.233.10.94528Energy Technologies 6.6 · Foundational
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Gainer+26.127.11.05324Justice System & Fundamental Rights 9.8 · Transitional
Market access opening S12 ↗Gainer+14.936.321.45725Energy Infrastructure 10.6 · Transitional
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed+8.320.712.44339Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 6.6 · Foundational
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Mixed+6.526.319.73538Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 5 · Nascent
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed+4.58.33.95537Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 10 · Transitional
Great-power détente S13 ↗Mixed+4.328.824.54238Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 5 · Nascent
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Mixed+3.229.926.85260Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9 · Transitional
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Mixed−0.118.918.952104Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9 · Transitional

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Thailand, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Strategic awareness failure8.1 Foundational → Nascent1.6% Possible · rank 25Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.0Quantum Technologies 3.3
Breakdown of state function10.9 Transitional → Foundational1.5% Possible · rank 158Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.6Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 8.7
Broad fall in governance and integrity10.5 Transitional → Foundational1.4% Possible · rank 88Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.7Quantum Technologies 3.3
Loss of financial stability13.2 Established → Transitional1.4% Possible · rank 121Regional war spillover Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.7Quantum Technologies 3.3
Rupture in trade and supply12.8 Established → Transitional1.2% Possible · rank 63Trade bloc rupture Major + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×2.5Maritime Power 10
Diplomatic isolation10.8 Transitional → Foundational1.1% Possible · rank 18Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.5Quantum Technologies 3.3
Broad fall in financial strength12.8 Established → Transitional1.0% Possible · rank 105Global funding seizure Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.9Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 11.2
Breakdown of information trust10.2 Transitional → Foundational1.0% Possible · rank 47Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.5Quantum Technologies 3.3
Broad fall in information and influence10.3 Transitional → Foundational1.0% Possible · rank 23Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.5Quantum Technologies 3.3
Broad fall in trade and investment12.8 Established → Transitional1.0% Possible · rank 29Trade bloc rupture Extremeplans fail×2.8Economic Leverage & Dependence 10.7
Collapse in energy security9.8 Transitional → Foundational0.7% Unlikely · rank 57Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×2.6Maritime Power 10
Failure of digital lifelines11.1 Transitional → Foundational0.6% Unlikely · rank 29Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.5Quantum Technologies 3.3
Broad fall in national security8.5 Foundational → Nascent0.5% Unlikely · rank 23Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×3.1Quantum Technologies 3.3
Rule of law failure9.9 Transitional → Foundational0.5% Unlikely · rank 136Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.5Quantum Technologies 3.3
Broad fall in critical technology6.2 Foundational → Inception0.4% Unlikely · rank 4Trade bloc rupture Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×3.1Quantum Technologies 3.3
Defence readiness failure11.1 Transitional → Foundational0.4% Unlikely · rank 33Regional war spillover Major + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×3.4Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 8.7
Loss of advanced technology base4.9 Nascent → Inception0.4% Unlikely · rank 5Trade bloc rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.9Economic Leverage & Dependence 10.7
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure12.2 Established → Foundational0.3% Unlikely · rank 75Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Majorplans fail×3.4Maritime Power 10
Broad fall in production and innovation11.3 Transitional → Foundational0.3% Unlikely · rank 77Trade bloc rupture Major + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×3.6Artificial Intelligence 7.3
Loss of industrial capacity12.2 Established → Foundational0.3% Unlikely · rank 98Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9
Health system failure12.8 Established → Foundational0.2% Remote · rank 186Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.3Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9
Broad fall in human capital11.7 Transitional → Foundational0.1% Remote · rank 84Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.1Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9
Food and water failure12.6 Established → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 179Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×4.4Maritime Power 10
Education pipeline failure12.2 Established → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 118Regional war spillover Severe + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×3.3Artificial Intelligence 7.3
Loss of strategic deterrence4.0 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 29Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×4.4Maritime Power 10
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Reliable low-cost energy8.6 Foundational → Transitional3.4% Possible · rank 28Clean power threshold Extreme×1.5Energy Technologies 6.6
Stronger health and biotechnology11.6 Transitional → Established2.3% Possible · rank 43Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9
Broad rise in trade and investment12.8 Established → Established2.1% Possible · rank 27Market access opening Severe + Great-power détente Severe×1.8Energy Infrastructure 10.6
Capable digital government11.7 Transitional → Established2.0% Possible · rank 40Chronic disease advance Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9
Sophisticated export strength13.2 Established → Established2.0% Possible · rank 24Market access opening Severe + Great-power détente Severe×1.7Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 5
Broad rise in governance and integrity10.5 Transitional → Established1.8% Possible · rank 41Chronic disease advance Major + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×1.9Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9
Trusted public institutions10.1 Transitional → Transitional1.5% Possible · rank 39Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.1Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9
Frontier AI and compute6.2 Foundational → Foundational1.1% Possible · rank 35Great-power détente Major + Automated discovery step Extreme×1.9Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 5
Higher-value international business12.4 Established → Established0.9% Unlikely · rank 29Market access opening Extreme + Great-power détente Major×1.6Energy Infrastructure 10.6
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure12.2 Established → Established0.7% Unlikely · rank 33Market access opening Severe + Clean power threshold Extreme×2.3Energy Technologies 6.6
Research translated into value10.5 Transitional → Established0.7% Unlikely · rank 34Clean power threshold Severe + Automated discovery step Extreme×2.3Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 5
Broad rise in critical technology6.2 Foundational → Foundational0.4% Unlikely · rank 43Automated discovery step Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.4Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9
Broad rise in production and innovation11.3 Transitional → Established0.4% Unlikely · rank 31Market access opening Severe + Clean power threshold Extreme×2.4Energy Technologies 6.6
Broad rise in human capital11.7 Transitional → Established0.4% Unlikely · rank 40Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.4Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9
Higher-value manufacturing9.9 Transitional → Transitional0.4% Unlikely · rank 34Automated discovery step Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9
Wider international influence10.8 Transitional → Established0.3% Unlikely · rank 29Great-power détente Major + Middle East settlement Extreme×2.1Justice System & Fundamental Rights 9.8
Secure food and water supply12.6 Established → Established0.2% Remote · rank 43Market access opening Extreme + Water-efficient food leap Extreme×2.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9
Adaptable skilled workforce10.5 Transitional → Established0.1% Remote · rank 39Market access opening Extreme + Clean power threshold Extreme×2.2Energy Infrastructure 10.6
Broad rise in information and influence10.3 Transitional → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 34Great-power détente Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.2Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9
Stronger information environment9.9 Transitional → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 40Great-power détente Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9
Deeper long-term finance12.7 Established → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 38Market access opening Extreme + Clean power threshold Extreme×2.4Energy Technologies 6.6
Broad rise in financial strength12.8 Established → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 47Clean power threshold Extreme + Chronic disease advance Extreme×2.6Energy Technologies 6.6
Broad rise in national security8.5 Foundational— No route · rank 41No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.4—
Assured space services5.9 Nascent— No route · rank 42No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.0—
More deployable joint force10.7 Transitional— No route · rank 40No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.5—