Africa · UGA

Uganda

Baseline index 5.53Rank 111 of 197NascentAfricaAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Stretched developers. Exposed to food and funding shocks; debt relief and better yields are their upside. One of 27 nations with a similar pattern of results.

High stakes over 10 years: higher vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
21.3
rank 98 of 197 · 3 years: 21.2
Worst case
−14.2%
Regional war spillover · tail −13.9%
Opportunity · 10 years
−0.9
rank 68 of 197 · 3 years: −0.7
Best case
+16
Water-efficient food leap · gainer in 3 of 10
Shock absorbed
24%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.23
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Maritime Power
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, Breadbasket failure, Global funding seizure. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; land borders with states in conflict or collapse; no coastline; share of population aged under 15; refugees hosted per head of population; low real gdp per head; low life expectancy at birth; little renewable water per head.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Uganda’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Regional war spillover S03High 0.69−0.79−0.99−0.44▼ 119Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06High 0.66−0.78−1.04−0.45▼ 224Energy Infrastructure 4.1 · Nascent
Core disaster S07High 0.73−0.74−1.02−0.45▼ 222Energy Infrastructure 4 · Nascent
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.73−0.70−0.94−0.41023Information Environment & Strategic Communication 3.4 · Nascent
Global funding seizure S02High 0.63−0.58−0.78−0.34▲ 118Investment Attraction & Projection 4.3 · Nascent
Severe pandemic S10Medium 0.41−0.49−0.64−0.28▲ 814Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.1 · Nascent
AI labour shock S08Medium 0.40−0.46−0.59−0.26▲ 714Artificial Intelligence 2.4 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09Medium 0.40−0.43−0.51−0.22▲ 815Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1 · Inception
Trade bloc rupture S01Low 0.34−0.39−0.51−0.22▲ 314Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04Low 0.21−0.18−0.23−0.10▲ 69Maritime Power 0.3 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Regional war spillover−0.45−1.06−0.89−0.41−0.41−1.02−0.95−0.82−1.05
Breadbasket failure−0.41−0.97−0.34−0.91−0.87−0.93−0.99−0.75−0.85
Core disaster−0.04−1.12−0.36−0.89−0.40−1.00−1.06−0.91−0.91
Legitimacy rupture−0.41−0.45−0.81−0.41−0.95−1.33−1.09−0.41−0.47
Global funding seizure−0.35−0.38·−0.39−0.35−0.78−1.28−0.90−0.80
Severe pandemic−0.52−0.26−0.21−0.63−0.55−0.59−0.55−0.54−0.54
AI labour shock−0.51−0.23·−0.61−0.54−0.63−0.54−0.53−0.53
Cryptographic trust break−0.56−0.30−0.56·−0.68−0.64−0.59−0.25−0.29
Trade bloc rupture−0.49−0.20−0.18−0.20−0.47−0.45−0.47−0.46−0.63
Hybrid coercion−0.13−0.29−0.29·−0.32−0.33·−0.12−0.12
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Uganda is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Gainer+16.019.33.42623Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4 · Nascent
Debt service reset S11 ↗Gainer+13.419.96.6323Energy Infrastructure 5.6 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Gainer+12.321.59.23157Intelligence & Assessment 5.5 · Nascent
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Mixed+8.216.68.42092Energy Technologies 2 · Inception
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Mixed+3.66.32.72759Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4 · Nascent
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed−2.29.912.226150Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4 · Nascent
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed−3.120.323.32189Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Mixed−8.54.112.61686Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.5 · Inception
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed−9.520.129.731110Energy Infrastructure 5.6 · Nascent
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−25.83.229.111137Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.5 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Uganda, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Loss of financial stability7.3 Foundational → Nascent2.2% Possible · rank 76Global funding seizure Extremeplans fail×2.1Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 5.2
Breakdown of state function7.3 Foundational → Nascent1.9% Possible · rank 139Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Extreme×2.1Information Environment & Strategic Communication 5
Broad fall in financial strength7.0 Foundational → Nascent1.1% Possible · rank 98Global funding seizure Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.4Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 5.2
Food and water failure6.6 Foundational → Nascent1.1% Possible · rank 33Breadbasket failure Extremeplans fail×2.0Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 5.2
Broad fall in governance and integrity7.2 Foundational → Nascent0.8% Unlikely · rank 151Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 5
Rupture in trade and supply6.1 Foundational → Nascent0.8% Unlikely · rank 102Regional war spillover Severe + Breadbasket failure Severeplans fail×2.1Maritime Power 0.8
Health system failure6.5 Foundational → Nascent0.8% Unlikely · rank 79Breadbasket failure Severe + Core disaster Severeplans fail×2.5National Resilience & Crisis Management 6.4
Collapse in energy security4.2 Nascent → Inception0.6% Unlikely · rank 58Regional war spillover Severe + Breadbasket failure Severeplans fail×2.2Maritime Power 0.8
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure6.1 Foundational → Inception0.4% Unlikely · rank 63Breadbasket failure Major + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.7National Resilience & Crisis Management 6.4
Broad fall in trade and investment6.1 Foundational → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 107Regional war spillover Severe + Breadbasket failure Extremeplans fail×2.9Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 5.2
Rule of law failure7.2 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 163Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×2.2Information Environment & Strategic Communication 5
Breakdown of information trust5.9 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 149Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×2.2Information Environment & Strategic Communication 5
Loss of industrial capacity5.8 Nascent → Inception0.2% Unlikely · rank 115Global funding seizure Extreme + Regional war spillover Severeplans fail×3.0Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 5.2
Broad fall in production and innovation5.7 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 119Global funding seizure Severe + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×3.3National Resilience & Crisis Management 6.4
Broad fall in human capital6.1 Foundational → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 90Breadbasket failure Severe + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×3.3National Resilience & Crisis Management 6.4
Broad fall in information and influence5.9 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 126Legitimacy rupture Severe + Breadbasket failure Extremeplans fail×3.1Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 5.2
Education pipeline failure6.6 Foundational → Nascent0.1% Remote · rank 85Breadbasket failure Extreme + Core disaster Severeplans fail×3.2Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 5.2
Diplomatic isolation6.2 Foundational → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 131Legitimacy rupture Severe + Breadbasket failure Extremeplans fail×3.0Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 5.2
Defence readiness failure5.3 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 109Regional war spillover Extreme + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×3.0Information Environment & Strategic Communication 5
Broad fall in critical technology1.7 Inception— No route · rank 112Already at the foot of the scale×5.4—
Broad fall in national security4.0 Nascent— No route · rank 118No route found · closest 2.8 of 3×3.4—
Loss of advanced technology base0.8 Inception— No route · rank 112Already at the foot of the scale×5.7—
Failure of digital lifelines5.9 Nascent— No route · rank 129No route found · closest 2.7 of 3×4.4—
Loss of strategic deterrence1.2 Inception— No route · rank 112Already at the foot of the scale×3.7—
Strategic awareness failure3.4 Nascent— No route · rank 117No route found · closest 2.7 of 3×3.5—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Capable digital government6.9 Foundational → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 87Market access opening Extreme + Public service leap Extreme×2.5Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2
Trusted public institutions7.1 Foundational → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 84Market access opening Extreme + Public service leap Extreme×2.5Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2
Reliable low-cost energy3.8 Nascent → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 76Middle East settlement Extreme + Clean power threshold Extreme×3.0Energy Technologies 2
Broad rise in critical technology1.7 Inception— No route · rank 111No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.5—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure6.1 Foundational— No route · rank 111No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.6—
Broad rise in national security4.0 Nascent— No route · rank 111No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×4.2—
Broad rise in human capital6.1 Foundational— No route · rank 111No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.1—
Broad rise in information and influence5.9 Nascent— No route · rank 111No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.5—
Broad rise in governance and integrity7.2 Foundational → Foundational— Remote · rank 111Middle East settlement Extreme + Public service leap Extreme×3.0Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2
Broad rise in financial strength7.0 Foundational— No route · rank 111No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.8—
Broad rise in production and innovation5.7 Nascent— No route · rank 111No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.5—
Broad rise in trade and investment6.1 Foundational— No route · rank 111No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.2—
Assured space services1.6 Inception— No route · rank 111No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.6—
Frontier AI and compute1.9 Inception— No route · rank 111No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.9—
Higher-value manufacturing3.5 Nascent— No route · rank 111No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×5.2—
Secure food and water supply6.6 Foundational— No route · rank 111No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×2.6—
More deployable joint force4.8 Nascent— No route · rank 111No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×4.7—
Adaptable skilled workforce5.6 Nascent— No route · rank 111No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×4.0—
Stronger health and biotechnology5.7 Nascent— No route · rank 111No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.9—
Stronger information environment5.6 Nascent— No route · rank 111No route found · closest 1.0 of 1.5×4.7—
Wider international influence6.2 Foundational— No route · rank 111No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×2.8—
Deeper long-term finance6.8 Foundational— No route · rank 111No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.9—
Research translated into value5.5 Nascent— No route · rank 111No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.9—
Higher-value international business5.9 Nascent— No route · rank 111No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.0—
Sophisticated export strength6.3 Foundational— No route · rank 111No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×3.7—