Latin America and Caribbean · URY

Uruguay

Baseline index 8.54Rank 63 of 197FoundationalLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Low vulnerability, and gains from open markets and digital public services. One of 39 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
12.3
rank 152 of 197 · 3 years: 12.1
Worst case
−8.9%
Severe pandemic · tail −8.3%
Opportunity · 10 years
+3.3
rank 63 of 197 · 3 years: +3.6
Best case
+23
Outbreak defence succeeds · gainer in 3 of 10
Shock absorbed
37%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.15
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Regional war spillover, AI labour shock, Global funding seizure. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; urban share of population; internet users as a share of population; youth unemployment rate; adult obesity rate.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Uruguay’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Severe pandemic S10High 0.78−0.76−1.21−0.53020Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.5 · Nascent
Regional war spillover S03High 0.70−0.70−1.02−0.45019Strategic Strike & Missile Defence 0 · Inception
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.72−0.67−0.91−0.40016Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.8 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.71−0.65−1.05−0.46020Artificial Intelligence 3.7 · Nascent
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.78−0.54−1.01−0.44▼ 113Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4.7 · Nascent
Core disaster S07High 0.67−0.51−0.93−0.41020Energy Infrastructure 8 · Foundational
Global funding seizure S02Medium 0.56−0.41−0.70−0.31015Economic Output & Productivity 8 · Foundational
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.40−0.40−0.60−0.26▲ 114Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04Medium 0.46−0.37−0.51−0.22011Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2.9 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06Low 0.21−0.20−0.33−0.15▲ 110Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 8.6 · Foundational

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Severe pandemic−0.81−0.41−0.33−0.99−0.86−0.92−0.86−0.84−0.84
Regional war spillover−0.40−0.95−0.83−0.36−0.36−0.91−0.85−0.73−0.93
Cryptographic trust break−0.86−0.47−0.87·−1.06−0.99−0.92−0.40−0.45
AI labour shock−0.72−0.33·−0.88−0.77−0.90−0.77−0.75−0.75
Legitimacy rupture−0.32−0.35−0.63−0.32−0.74−1.03−0.84−0.32−0.36
Core disaster−0.03−0.77−0.25−0.61−0.27−0.68−0.73−0.63−0.63
Global funding seizure−0.25−0.27·−0.27−0.25−0.55−0.90−0.63−0.56
Trade bloc rupture−0.51−0.20−0.18−0.20−0.47−0.45−0.47−0.46−0.63
Hybrid coercion−0.27−0.60−0.60·−0.67−0.69·−0.25−0.25
Breadbasket failure−0.10−0.25−0.09−0.23−0.22−0.24−0.25−0.19−0.22
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Uruguay is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Gainer+23.227.24.03856Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5 · Nascent
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Gainer+20.421.91.63146Energy Technologies 3.2 · Nascent
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Gainer+10.433.823.44049Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5 · Nascent
Public service leap S18 ↗Mixed+7.918.710.73741Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3.4 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed+7.813.15.33875Intelligence & Assessment 5.2 · Nascent
Market access opening S12 ↗Mixed+7.421.914.54844Investment Attraction & Projection 9 · Transitional
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed+2.27.14.95469Energy Infrastructure 9.1 · Transitional
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Mixed−5.89.014.81658Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.7 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Mixed−6.98.415.32276Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.7 · Inception
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Loser−19.69.829.438189Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5 · Nascent

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Uruguay, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function13.1 Established → Transitional2.1% Possible · rank 124Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Majorplans fail×2.7Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6
Loss of financial stability11.5 Transitional → Foundational1.1% Possible · rank 147Global funding seizure Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×3.0Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 7.6
Broad fall in financial strength10.8 Transitional → Foundational1.0% Unlikely · rank 114Global funding seizure Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×3.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6
Broad fall in governance and integrity13.0 Established → Transitional0.9% Unlikely · rank 144Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.9Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6
Breakdown of information trust9.1 Transitional → Nascent0.5% Unlikely · rank 99Legitimacy rupture Severe + AI labour shock Severeplans fail×2.8Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6
Rule of law failure13.6 Established → Transitional0.5% Unlikely · rank 134Regional war spillover Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severeplans fail×2.8Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6
Rupture in trade and supply9.2 Transitional → Foundational0.5% Unlikely · rank 126Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×2.4Maritime Power 4.3
Defence readiness failure4.9 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 46Regional war spillover Major + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×3.3Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6
Health system failure12.3 Established → Foundational0.3% Unlikely · rank 164Regional war spillover Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5
Strategic awareness failure3.8 Nascent → Inception0.3% Unlikely · rank 72Regional war spillover Major + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.3Quantum Technologies 1.3
Broad fall in information and influence7.3 Foundational → Nascent0.2% Unlikely · rank 102Trade bloc rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.8Quantum Technologies 1.3
Collapse in energy security5.6 Nascent → Inception0.2% Unlikely · rank 95Regional war spillover Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Majorplans fail×2.5Maritime Power 4.3
Broad fall in trade and investment9.4 Transitional → Foundational0.2% Unlikely · rank 133Trade bloc rupture Severe + Regional war spillover Extremeplans fail×3.2Maritime Power 4.3
Loss of industrial capacity9.7 Transitional → Foundational0.2% Unlikely · rank 110Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.6Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5
Broad fall in production and innovation9.7 Transitional → Foundational0.2% Remote · rank 106Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure9.0 Transitional → Foundational0.2% Remote · rank 107Regional war spillover Extreme + Hybrid coercion Severeplans fail×3.2Maritime Power 4.3
Diplomatic isolation7.2 Foundational → Nascent0.1% Remote · rank 122Trade bloc rupture Severe + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.8Quantum Technologies 1.3
Broad fall in human capital11.4 Transitional → Foundational0.1% Remote · rank 102Regional war spillover Severe + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.0Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5
Food and water failure11.4 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 177Hybrid coercion Severe + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×3.6Financial System Depth & Access 10.4
Education pipeline failure12.1 Established → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 132AI labour shock Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.3Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5
Broad fall in national security3.8 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 79Regional war spillover Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×3.5Maritime Power 4.3
Failure of digital lifelines8.6 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 98Regional war spillover Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.8Quantum Technologies 1.3
Broad fall in critical technology2.5 Inception— No route · rank 67Already at the foot of the scale×3.5—
Loss of advanced technology base1.2 Inception— No route · rank 66Already at the foot of the scale×3.9—
Loss of strategic deterrence1.0 Inception— No route · rank 68Already at the foot of the scale×5.2—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Stronger health and biotechnology9.9 Transitional → Transitional1.5% Possible · rank 55Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Severe×1.8Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5
Capable digital government12.1 Established → Established0.7% Unlikely · rank 57Public service leap Severe + Chronic disease advance Extreme×2.2Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5
Broad rise in governance and integrity13.0 Established → Established0.4% Unlikely · rank 59Chronic disease advance Severe + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.4Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5
Trusted public institutions12.9 Established → Established0.4% Unlikely · rank 64Public service leap Severe + Chronic disease advance Extreme×2.4Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5
Broad rise in critical technology2.5 Inception → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 56Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5
Broad rise in human capital11.4 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 57Chronic disease advance Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5
Reliable low-cost energy6.2 Foundational → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 60Market access opening Extreme + Clean power threshold Extreme×2.3Energy Technologies 3.2
Broad rise in financial strength10.8 Transitional → Establishedunder 0.1% Remote · rank 55Clean power threshold Extreme + Chronic disease advance Extreme×2.5Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5
Broad rise in trade and investment9.4 Transitional → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 64Market access opening Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.9Investment Attraction & Projection 9
Higher-value international business10.0 Transitional → Transitionalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 68Market access opening Extreme + Outbreak defence succeeds Extreme×2.7Investment Attraction & Projection 9
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure9.0 Transitional— No route · rank 69No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.3—
Broad rise in national security3.8 Nascent— No route · rank 63No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.9—
Broad rise in information and influence7.3 Foundational— No route · rank 64No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.1—
Broad rise in production and innovation9.7 Transitional— No route · rank 63No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.5—
Assured space services2.0 Inception— No route · rank 63No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.2—
Frontier AI and compute2.8 Inception— No route · rank 64No route found · closest 1.5 of 1.5×3.0—
Higher-value manufacturing5.2 Nascent— No route · rank 63No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.7—
Secure food and water supply11.4 Transitional— No route · rank 73No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.7—
More deployable joint force4.9 Nascent— No route · rank 63No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.3—
Adaptable skilled workforce10.6 Transitional— No route · rank 66No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.4—
Stronger information environment7.4 Foundational— No route · rank 63No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×2.8—
Wider international influence7.2 Foundational— No route · rank 66No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.7—
Deeper long-term finance10.1 Transitional— No route · rank 64No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.4—
Research translated into value8.6 Foundational— No route · rank 66No route found · closest 1.3 of 1.5×3.7—
Sophisticated export strength9.4 Transitional— No route · rank 64No route found · closest 1.4 of 1.5×3.4—