Russia and Eurasia · UZB

Uzbekistan

Baseline index 5.92Rank 100 of 197NascentRussia and EurasiaAtlas profileAll results
Read with care

Third illustrative run, on the second-pass scenario set. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings were drafted with the scenario records in the second pass; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario’s regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on vulnerability; the upside mostly passes them by. One of 40 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years
21.8
rank 96 of 197 · 3 years: 21.4
Worst case
−14.3%
Cryptographic trust break · tail −13.2%
Opportunity · 10 years
−12.5
rank 146 of 197 · 3 years: −12.2
Best case
+6
Clean power threshold · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed
24%
by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend
+0.25
expected index points from best practice
Breadth
10of 10
scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest link
Maritime Power
weakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Hybrid coercion, AI labour shock, Trade bloc rupture. Highest exposure indicators: no coastline; remittances relative to gdp; internet users as a share of population; consumer price inflation; industry as a share of gdp; earthquake, storm, flood, drought and volcanic hazards named for the nation.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Uzbekistan’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Cryptographic trust break S09High 0.82−0.84−1.01−0.45▼ 425Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Legitimacy rupture S05High 0.78−0.80−0.99−0.44▼ 523Political Institutions & Civic Participation 2.1 · Inception
AI labour shock S08High 0.63−0.70−0.92−0.41▼ 122Artificial Intelligence 1.6 · Inception
Severe pandemic S10Medium 0.60−0.69−0.92−0.41024Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.5 · Inception
Core disaster S07High 0.66−0.63−0.91−0.40▼ 220Trade Facilitation & Logistics 4.6 · Nascent
Trade bloc rupture S01Medium 0.54−0.59−0.78−0.35▼ 119Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Hybrid coercion S04High 0.70−0.59−0.76−0.33▼ 716Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Regional war spillover S03Medium 0.54−0.58−0.77−0.34▲ 519Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Breadbasket failure S06Low 0.34−0.39−0.54−0.23▲ 314Trade Facilitation & Logistics 5.3 · Nascent
Global funding seizure S02Low 0.27−0.25−0.34−0.15▲ 611Investment Attraction & Projection 5.4 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCT Critical TechnologySI Strategic InfrastructureNS National SecurityHC Human CapitalII Information & InfluenceGI Governance & IntegrityFS Financial StrengthPI Production & InnovationTI Trade & Investment
Cryptographic trust break−0.98−0.62−1.05·−1.37−1.28−1.20−0.51−0.59
Legitimacy rupture−0.47−0.51−0.86−0.47−1.09−1.52−1.24−0.47−0.53
AI labour shock−0.75−0.35·−0.94−0.82−0.97−0.82−0.81−0.81
Severe pandemic−0.72−0.37−0.29−0.90−0.78−0.84−0.78−0.77−0.77
Core disaster−0.03−0.96−0.30−0.76−0.34−0.85−0.91−0.78−0.78
Trade bloc rupture−0.72−0.30−0.27−0.30−0.71−0.68−0.71−0.69−0.95
Hybrid coercion−0.45−0.98−0.84·−1.09−1.12·−0.41−0.41
Regional war spillover−0.33−0.79−0.63−0.30−0.30−0.76−0.71−0.61−0.78
Breadbasket failure−0.20−0.48−0.17−0.46−0.43−0.47−0.50−0.37−0.43
Global funding seizure−0.15−0.17·−0.17−0.15−0.34−0.56−0.39−0.35
Smaller to larger fall

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Uzbekistan is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Clean power threshold S15 ↗Mixed+6.411.55.128101Energy Technologies 3.4 · Nascent
Debt service reset S11 ↗Mixed−3.33.36.632145Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 5 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S14 ↗Mixed−4.07.911.931147Justice System & Fundamental Rights 5.3 · Nascent
Chronic disease advance S19 ↗Mixed−7.716.724.428116Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8 · Nascent
Outbreak defence succeeds S20 ↗Mixed−7.712.820.527175Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8 · Nascent
Water-efficient food leap S16 ↗Loser−16.010.426.428175Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8 · Nascent
Market access opening S12 ↗Loser−17.211.628.933148Trade Facilitation & Logistics 6 · Foundational
Public service leap S18 ↗Loser−17.211.528.720173Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.8 · Inception
Great-power détente S13 ↗Loser−22.93.326.216169Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.7 · Inception
Automated discovery step S17 ↗Loser−29.66.035.612152Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.7 · Inception

Reverse stress test

Working backwards from an outcome to the conditions most likely to produce it for Uzbekistan, over 10 years. Headroom is how many times Standard Severe the nearest single scenario would have to be. The lever is the capability where a change would move the result most.How to read it.

Routes to failureBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Breakdown of state function7.1 Foundational → Nascent3.5% Possible · rank 62Hybrid coercion Severe + Legitimacy rupture Severe×1.8Political Institutions & Civic Participation 4
Breakdown of information trust5.4 Nascent → Inception1.9% Possible · rank 5Hybrid coercion Major + Legitimacy rupture Extreme×1.9Political Institutions & Civic Participation 4
Broad fall in governance and integrity6.4 Foundational → Nascent1.8% Possible · rank 60Hybrid coercion Major + Legitimacy rupture Extreme×2.0Political Institutions & Civic Participation 4
Strategic awareness failure3.8 Nascent → Inception1.4% Possible · rank 34Hybrid coercion Major + Cryptographic trust break Extreme×1.8Quantum Technologies 0.5
Broad fall in information and influence5.6 Nascent → Inception1.3% Possible · rank 5Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 0.5
Diplomatic isolation5.4 Nascent → Inception1.1% Possible · rank 19Hybrid coercion Severe + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.2Quantum Technologies 0.5
Rule of law failure5.3 Nascent → Inception0.8% Unlikely · rank 65Hybrid coercion Severe + Legitimacy rupture Extreme×1.9Political Institutions & Civic Participation 4
Loss of financial stability7.3 Foundational → Nascent0.7% Unlikely · rank 169Legitimacy rupture Extreme + AI labour shock Severe×2.1Political Institutions & Civic Participation 4
Broad fall in financial strength6.8 Foundational → Nascent0.5% Unlikely · rank 162Legitimacy rupture Extreme + AI labour shock Majorplans fail×2.4Political Institutions & Civic Participation 4
Rupture in trade and supply6.2 Foundational → Nascent0.4% Unlikely · rank 142Hybrid coercion Severe + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.8Financial System Depth & Access 7
Health system failure8.0 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 141Trade bloc rupture Major + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×2.2Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8
Collapse in energy security7.3 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 82Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×3.0Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 4.7
Broad fall in strategic infrastructure7.8 Foundational → Nascent0.3% Unlikely · rank 85Regional war spillover Severe + Hybrid coercion Extremeplans fail×3.1Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 4.7
Failure of digital lifelines5.8 Nascent → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 73Hybrid coercion Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Severeplans fail×2.3Cyber & Electromagnetic Operations 4.7
Broad fall in trade and investment6.0 Foundational → Inception0.1% Remote · rank 154Trade bloc rupture Extreme + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×3.2Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 5
Food and water failure8.4 Foundational → Nascent0.1% Remote · rank 159Hybrid coercion Severe + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×2.9Financial System Depth & Access 7
Broad fall in national security4.3 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 69Hybrid coercion Extreme + Cryptographic trust break Extremeplans fail×2.9Quantum Technologies 0.5
Loss of industrial capacity7.6 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 153Hybrid coercion Extreme + Core disaster Extremeplans fail×3.5Financial System Depth & Access 7
Broad fall in production and innovation6.6 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 155Trade bloc rupture Extreme + Severe pandemic Extremeplans fail×3.7Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8
Defence readiness failure5.4 Nascent → Inceptionunder 0.1% Remote · rank 95Hybrid coercion Extreme + Legitimacy rupture Extremeplans fail×3.0Political Institutions & Civic Participation 4
Broad fall in human capital7.9 Foundational → Nascentunder 0.1% Remote · rank 169Core disaster Severe + AI labour shock Extremeplans fail×3.2Artificial Intelligence 3
Education pipeline failure9.1 Transitional → Foundationalunder 0.1% Remote · rank 180AI labour shock Extreme + Severe pandemic Severeplans fail×3.4Artificial Intelligence 3
Broad fall in critical technology1.9 Inception— No route · rank 101Already at the foot of the scale×3.1—
Loss of advanced technology base1.1 Inception— No route · rank 101Already at the foot of the scale×4.0—
Loss of strategic deterrence1.9 Inception— No route · rank 101Already at the foot of the scale×4.4—
Routes to prosperityBasketLikelihoodMost likely routeHeadroomLever
Broad rise in critical technology1.9 Inception— No route · rank 100No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.4—
Broad rise in strategic infrastructure7.8 Foundational— No route · rank 100No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×7.1—
Broad rise in national security4.3 Nascent— No route · rank 100No route found · closest 0.4 of 1.5×12—
Broad rise in human capital7.9 Foundational— No route · rank 100No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.4—
Broad rise in information and influence5.6 Nascent— No route · rank 100No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×6.7—
Broad rise in governance and integrity6.4 Foundational— No route · rank 100No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.8—
Broad rise in financial strength6.8 Foundational— No route · rank 100No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.1—
Broad rise in production and innovation6.6 Foundational— No route · rank 100No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.8—
Broad rise in trade and investment6.0 Foundational— No route · rank 100No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.5—
Assured space services1.7 Inception— No route · rank 100No route found · closest 0.5 of 1.5×8.9—
Frontier AI and compute1.8 Inception— No route · rank 100No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.0—
Higher-value manufacturing4.8 Nascent— No route · rank 100No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.8—
Reliable low-cost energy5.6 Nascent— No route · rank 102No route found · closest 0.9 of 1.5×4.3—
Secure food and water supply8.4 Foundational— No route · rank 100No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×4.8—
More deployable joint force4.8 Nascent— No route · rank 100No route found · closest 0.3 of 1.5×13—
Adaptable skilled workforce6.8 Foundational— No route · rank 100No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.8—
Stronger health and biotechnology6.6 Foundational— No route · rank 101No route found · closest 1.2 of 1.5×3.6—
Stronger information environment5.8 Nascent— No route · rank 100No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×5.9—
Wider international influence5.4 Nascent— No route · rank 100No route found · closest 0.6 of 1.5×7.6—
Capable digital government7.8 Foundational— No route · rank 105No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.3—
Trusted public institutions5.6 Nascent— No route · rank 104No route found · closest 1.1 of 1.5×4.3—
Deeper long-term finance6.6 Foundational— No route · rank 100No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.8—
Research translated into value5.8 Nascent— No route · rank 100No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×7.2—
Higher-value international business6.2 Foundational— No route · rank 100No route found · closest 0.8 of 1.5×5.2—
Sophisticated export strength6.2 Foundational— No route · rank 100No route found · closest 0.7 of 1.5×6.5—